• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Conversion of Manchester Metrolink to low-floor operation?

Status
Not open for further replies.

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,531
Location
Yorkshire
Tram-trains don't meet the heavy rail standards for crashworthiness - that's the reason they need enhanced train protection provision such as TPWS at all signals. The degree of risk depends on the probability as well as the severity of a possible collision, and as the severity is higher the probability is reduced to compensate.

Having said that, more recent tram-train designs do include extra crashworthiness so are intermediate between trams and trains. But that could possibly be argued out in a safety case, based on alternative provisions being made instead.
My assumption was that the standard they need to meet wasn't necessarily fully commensurate with those required for actual trains, but higher than the standard for trams: as you say, an intermediate level. I probably didn't express that as clearly as I should, as I was tired!
My point was that simply being high-floor and running (in part) on former rail alignments does not make the M5000s tram-trains, or particularly close.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top