• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Conwy Valley Line

Llanigraham

On Moderation
Joined
23 Mar 2013
Messages
6,105
Location
Powys
Their is millions of tonnes of slag at the top end that can be used in furnaces so it would be foolish to not consider this as a business option to keep it off the roads that are not the widest and safest.

Correction, it is not "slag", that is either furnace or in Wales coal mine waste. What is present around Blaenau is slate waste.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bleeder4

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2019
Messages
266
Location
Worcester
Am I right in thinking there is no freight on the line? In which case I don't know why ballast is needed at all, a lightweight tram line with slabs would do whenever some ballast gets washed away.
It's popular with charters though, which are usually heavy trains, far heavier than the little units that normally shuffle along the line. For example, I'm going along it in June with 2 Class 47s and 11 coaches.
 

Steve B

Member
Joined
23 Sep 2011
Messages
40
Their is millions of tonnes of slag at the top end that can be used in furnaces so it would be foolish to not consider this as a business option to keep it off the roads that are not the widest and safest.
The tips at Blaenau are made of slate waste - which doesn't burn. It can have it's uses, and if there was sufficient demand in the right places could be moved by train.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
1,205
Location
Lichfield
In reality, what are the chances of freight returning to the Conwy Valley line?

I can't imagine it's all that high.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,741
Location
Wales
The tips at Blaenau are made of slate waste - which doesn't burn. It can have it's uses, and if there was sufficient demand in the right places could be moved by train.
Slate waste from Penrhyn Quarry is currently being loaded onto trains at Llandudno Junction.

In reality, what are the chances of freight returning to the Conwy Valley line?

I can't imagine it's all that high.
There's talk of moving low-level waste from Trawsfynydd out by rail. At some point the site will be flattened and they may wish to use rail to move the rubble, again to reduce lorry movements on local roads. Rolls-Royce are developing Small Modular Reactors and Traws has been mooted as a potential site, I'm not sure if those will ship out waste while in operation like full-size reactors do.

Then there's slate waste, if the market grows it may be worth loading in Blaenau itself rather than roading the waste down the A470 to Junction for loading with the Penrhyn waste.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,661
Wasn’t there a plan to ship out slate waste that was stopped because it caused too much vibration to residents near the line?
Think there is a weird heritage conflict between wanting to preserve the grey wasteland the slate industry has left as opposed to removing the slate waste and making the place greener.
 

Tomos y Tanc

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2019
Messages
648
Think there is a weird heritage conflict between wanting to preserve the grey wasteland the slate industry has left as opposed to removing the slate waste and making the place greener.
That's undoubtedly true especially as the Eryri slate landscape now has World Heritage status. Personally I find the waste heaps strangely attractive - but I'm not sure I'd like to live next to them!
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,661
That's undoubtedly true especially as the Eryri slate landscape now has World Heritage status. Personally I find the waste heaps strangely attractive - but I'm not sure I'd like to live next to them!
Bizarre. Maybe a little bit of it but when it’s everywhere it’s utterly depressing in the rain…..which seems to be most of the time there!
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,041
Wasn’t there a plan to ship out slate waste that was stopped because it caused too much vibration to residents near the line?
Think there is a weird heritage conflict between wanting to preserve the grey wasteland the slate industry has left as opposed to removing the slate waste and making the place greener.
That's undoubtedly true especially as the Eryri slate landscape now has World Heritage status. Personally I find the waste heaps strangely attractive - but I'm not sure I'd like to live next to them!

There is some detail (with pictures) here on the trial trains. The following extract taken from that page. The trials were way back in 2002!
A new terminal, for which planning permission has been granted, would be built at Rhiwbryfdir. The terminal would be served by a conveyor belt from Oakley Quarry on the West side of the railway. The conveyor would cross over the former Ffestiniog Railway Dinas Branch and the Conwy Valley line to the new terminal. The rock would come from the inner part of the quarry and not be taken from the waste heap visible. This is Y Domen Fawr and is a listed structure.
I thought it was a Scheduled Ancient Monument rather than a listed structure.

Y Domen Fawr translates as The Big Dump.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,741
Location
Wales
Wasn’t there a plan to ship out slate waste that was stopped because it caused too much vibration to residents near the line?
That was the claim, though a local Freightliner Heavy Haul driver who attended the public meeting asked the attendees whether they'd slept well that night. None of them noticed the ballast train that went through in the middle of the night.

Think there is a weird heritage conflict between wanting to preserve the grey wasteland the slate industry has left as opposed to removing the slate waste and making the place greener.
If quarry companies wish to continue quarrying, they have to make good the exhausted land at the same rate that they are digging fresh land up.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,916
There's talk of moving low-level waste from Trawsfynydd out by rail. At some point the site will be flattened and they may wish to use rail to move the rubble, again to reduce lorry movements on local roads. Rolls-Royce are developing Small Modular Reactors and Traws has been mooted as a potential site, I'm not sure if those will ship out waste while in operation like full-size reactors do.
The problem with that would be the cost of rehabilitating the line beyond Blaenau. I remember looking at the accessible pounts of the line a decade or more ago, and it was getting pretty overgrown then. Unless someone has been doing some work since, I imagine there are bushes and even trees growing through the track by now.

IIRC the track was bullhead rail on timber sleepers, so it's likely to need complete relaying - it wouldn't be quite on the scale of East - West Rail, but there'll be similarities.

At a guess, it would need:
  • Lift and scrap existing track
  • Use road plant on the old ballast to cut and remove vegetation
  • Rehabilitate drainage and culverts
  • Remove old ballast to formation level
  • Lay geotextile and fresh ballast
  • Lay new track
It could presumably operate with one train in section, locked in at BF, so wouldn't need much signalling other than maybe for the level crossings.

Rebuilding the Leven line (double track and stations, but slightly shorter) was costed at £117m. Taking out stations, most signalling, and the second track, would still be likely to leave a cost of over £50m. Would the potential power station traffic ever justify that sort of expense?
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,661
Rebuilding the Leven line (double track and stations, but slightly shorter) was costed at £117m. Taking out stations, most signalling, and the second track, would still be likely to leave a cost of over £50m. Would the potential power station traffic ever justify that sort of expense?
That would only be a small part of the huge budget for a power station, and wouldn’t they need the line to bring in construction materials?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,290
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Rebuilding the Leven line (double track and stations, but slightly shorter) was costed at £117m. Taking out stations, most signalling, and the second track, would still be likely to leave a cost of over £50m. Would the potential power station traffic ever justify that sort of expense?

If any sort of new reactor was to be installed I reckon they would regardless of the cost. Transporting significant quantities of nuclear material by road is not likely to be acceptable for a huge swathe of both safety and perception reasons.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,496
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
If any sort of new reactor was to be installed I reckon they would regardless of the cost. Transporting significant quantities of nuclear material by road is not likely to be acceptable for a huge swathe of both safety and perception reasons.
In past years, if a nuclear reactor was planned, was rail connections to the site always part of the strategic plan during the construction works if an existing railway line was reasonably near to the site?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,290
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
In past years, if a nuclear reactor was planned, was rail connections to the site always part of the strategic plan during the construction works if an existing railway line was reasonably near to the site?

I think further than that - only sites feasible to access by rail are considered. Are there any sites not accessible by rail?
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,496
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
I think further than that - only sites feasible to access by rail are considered. Are there any sites not accessible by rail?
The one that I had in mind was that of the Dounreay reactor site using fast-breeder technology that was commissioned in the 1950s and is situated nine miles west of Thurso. I was told that a ten-year run-down was due to start in 2023.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,661
A power station in Snowdonia is going to have enough planning issues, no Way could they fight through bringing everything in by road when there is a railway nearby.
Was the railway used to build the original power station And was the Bala line still operational then?
How many freight trains could the Conwy valley line take per day?

The one that I had in mind was that of the Dounreay reactor site using fast-breeder technology that was commissioned in the 1950s and is situated nine miles west of Thurso. I was told that a ten-year run-down was due to start in 2023.
Dounreay was experimental wasn’t it? So they built it a long way from cities, yet still within reach of the railway.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,916
That would only be a small part of the huge budget for a power station, and wouldn’t they need the line to bring in construction materials?
There will be a close focus on minimising all costs (aka value engineering). "It's only another £50m while we're at it" is a recipe for runaway cost overruns.

In past years, if a nuclear reactor was planned, was rail connections to the site always part of the strategic plan during the construction works if an existing railway line was reasonably near to the site?
Existing nuclear sites were mostly planned, under construction or built by the Beeching era, so it was relatively easy simply to keep branch lines that would otherwise have been closed (e.g. Leiston, Lydd, and no doubt many others).

I think further than that - only sites feasible to access by rail are considered. Are there any sites not accessible by rail?
Hinkley Point - the distance from there to the transload at Bridgwater is more than that from Trawsfynydd to Blaenau Ffestiniog. And the A470 runs directly between Trawsfynydd and Blaenau, unlike the minor roads to Hinkley Point (though they may have been upgraded by the power station contractors).
 

Meole

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2018
Messages
480
Given "winter" lasts until the end of May according to the railway, I suspect that isn't quite true.

I can imagine a lot of people wanting to use that service in April and May if the weather is fine, for example.
The seasonal restriction applies to the Cambrian coast but not to the under used Conwy valley route, the coast is far too busy in summer for free tickets to be allowed.
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,223
The seasonal restriction applies to the Cambrian coast but not to the under used Conwy valley route, the coast is far too busy in summer for free tickets to be allowed.
Maybe the concessions on the Conwy Valley are valid all year because there are virtually no bus services between Betws y Coed and Blaenau Ffestiniog?
 

nwales58

Member
Joined
15 Mar 2022
Messages
452
Location
outofaction
Maybe the concessions on the Conwy Valley are valid all year because there are virtually no bus services between Betws y Coed and Blaenau Ffestiniog?

Dolwyddelan was the specific reason at the time, I recall.

Supposedly the largest village (or largest in Conwy?) where the concessionary travel pass had no value. Can't remember the year, post 2002 obviously, at that time it had no buses so pre-Express Motors X1.

Memory going, but at that time the concession was only for our local passes, all-Wales came later.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,661
A modular reactor at Trawsfynydd has been scrapped this morning, with the claim that the site is too small for one.
Not entirely. This BBC article just says that Trawsfynydd has been taken out the first tranche of SMR sites due to a lack of quickly available space, but that it might still be a future site (summarised rather than quoted)
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,741
Location
Wales
Great British Nuclear (GBN) said Trawsfynydd, which had an operating nuclear power plant until 1991 "might not be able to deploy quite as quickly as some other potential sites".
Reading between the lines, the only suitable site is that occupied by the decommissioned power station. Until that site is cleared there is no space.
 

Pacef8

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2020
Messages
332
Location
Wirral
At least ten years for stuff to bio degrade . I am surprised we are not discussing Wylfa as a option again .
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,057
Location
St. Albans
Given "winter" lasts until the end of May according to the railway, I suspect that isn't quite true.

I can imagine a lot of people wanting to use that service in April and May if the weather is fine, for example.
OAP free tickets are available all year unlike the Cambrian line
 

Top