• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

could we sell off Clapham Junction's air rights?

Status
Not open for further replies.

miklcct

On Moderation
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
4,416
Location
Cricklewood
Why should ugly decks only be built over stations, if air space is the thing and aesthetics clearly count for nothing, to developers? Why not build rafts over the main lines eg to Woking? There has been a small one at Wimbledon for years. Why not over roads? Motorways are a waste of valuable retail or housing space after all. There is one at Hatfield over the A1(M). If aesthetics count for nothing. just build rafts over peoples houses, which is just more wasted air space. An amazing lack of ethics, integrity and quality of life considerations. Moral bankruptcy at its best. Of course property developers don't even know what that type of bankruptcy means, being the moral and ethical vacuum that they are.
Houses should be bought by developers to be re-developed for high rise buildings.
Shopping mall design nowadays can have a reserved space for a motorway to pass through it.
Urban railways should be converted to underground railways if possible.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,570
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Houses should be bought by developers to be re-developed for high rise buildings.
Shopping mall design nowadays can have a reserved space for a motorway to pass through it.
Urban railways should be converted to underground railways if possible.

One day you will understand that the UK isn't Asia and that things that work there won't necessarily work here.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
17,048
One day you will understand that the UK isn't Asia and that things that work there won't necessarily work here.
Well I can certainly get behind burying railways and roads if possible.

But mainly to remove such infrastructural impacts from the landscape.
 

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,084
Location
Dyfneint
Well I can certainly get behind burying railways and roads if possible.

But mainly to remove such infrastructural impacts from the landscape.

Bury towns too then - unspoiled, um, farmland to gaze over when you leave your dwelling every day.

Can be quite hard to notice railways & less major roads if you're not looking for them ( at least if the area has a lot of hedges ). Motorways not so much.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,402
Location
Wittersham Kent
One heck of a lot of people don't actually find this an issue, or are happy to live with it.
A lot of these things are better tried in store, including clothes and shoes, or inspected in store, like plants.

I don't want to risk buying shoes which do not fit on my feet, have the wrong shape or bottom thickness, etc., and risk 2 weeks of round trip time and return postage to return and rebuy another pair.
I needed a new pair of walking boots so travelled on a 25 mile bus and rail trip to the nearest branch of a major retailer in Canterbury. It was a repeat purchase so more or less definate. The stock the shop held of any walking boots in my size was pathetic but never mind they could guarantee next day delivery to my home of practically anything. After a day wasted came back home and bought boots on line for next day delivery, haven't been to Canterbury since.
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
In terms of building a deck, it's a lot easier if the site is mainly storage, as at Hudson Yards in New York

Of course, that project also made sense as it was infill in Midtown Manhattan.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,442
In terms of building a deck, it's a lot easier if the site is mainly storage, as at Hudson Yards in New York

Of course, that project also made sense as it was infill in Midtown Manhattan.

And, relevant to this thread, the most expensive ‘real estate’ development in North America - ever. A development at Clapham would be half as large again.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,458
That would be big flats!

Indeed, my 3 bed house is about 90m2, and whilst that's towards the smaller end for that type of property (no ensuite, no downstairs loo, stairs in the lounge) 150m2 of property would be worth a whole lot more than £500,000 (it would almost certainly be more than that at Woking, maybe more even in Basingstoke, let alone Clapham Junction).
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
7,503
One heck of a lot of people don't actually find this an issue, or are happy to live with it.

The other issue is : do people really want to be stuck in bubbles in their homes, long after Covid has peaked? Many people appreciate socialising, and many people appreciate a change of scene rather than stuck looking at the same four walls 24/7 - haven''t we had enough of that in the past 18 months?

I suspect once Covid is no longer a significant risk there will be a big movement to return to normal life. Isolation causes mental health issues, and if there is no longer a good reason for isolation, will people tolerate it? Quite apart from the huge job losses, and all that entails, from downsizing retail and office working.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,570
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The rise of 'Buy Now Pay Later' services makes this inconvenience almost totally go away too.

And credit cards which are nothing new.

The other issue is : do people really want to be stuck in bubbles in their homes, long after Covid has peaked? Many people appreciate socialising, and many people appreciate a change of scene rather than stuck looking at the same four walls 24/7 - haven''t we had enough of that in the past 18 months?

I suspect once Covid is no longer a significant risk there will be a big movement to return to normal life. Isolation causes mental health issues, and if there is no longer a good reason for isolation, will people tolerate it?

Yes, I want to socialise with people. I hate shopping, however, so I won't be doing any of that!
 

camflyer

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2018
Messages
878
Why should ugly decks only be built over stations, if air space is the thing and aesthetics clearly count for nothing, to developers? Why not build rafts over the main lines eg to Woking? There has been a small one at Wimbledon for years. Why not over roads? Motorways are a waste of valuable retail or housing space after all. There is one at Hatfield over the A1(M). If aesthetics count for nothing. just build rafts over peoples houses, which is just more wasted air space. An amazing lack of ethics, integrity and quality of life considerations. Moral bankruptcy at its best. Of course property developers don't even know what that type of bankruptcy means, being the moral and ethical vacuum that they are.

Air rights is one of the main reasons why the Hong Kong MTR actually makes a profit.

 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,391
Location
N Yorks
The other issue is : do people really want to be stuck in bubbles in their homes, long after Covid has peaked? Many people appreciate socialising, and many people appreciate a change of scene rather than stuck looking at the same four walls 24/7 - haven''t we had enough of that in the past 18 months?

I suspect once Covid is no longer a significant risk there will be a big movement to return to normal life. Isolation causes mental health issues, and if there is no longer a good reason for isolation, will people tolerate it? Quite apart from the huge job losses, and all that entails, from downsizing retail and office working.
they dont want to pay ££££ a year to be stuck in a sardine can 2 hours a day either. For many jobs, commuting is just a waste.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top