• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Covid and deepening inequality

Status
Not open for further replies.

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,042
Location
Taunton or Kent
Oxfam have published their annual report for the World Economic Forum in Davos, and have highlighted how the wealth of the top 10 richest men in the world doubled in the pandemic, while an extra 160 million people are in poverty, and, perhaps most eye-catching with regards to daily death tolls, lower incomes for the world's poorest have contributed to 21,000 deaths each day:


The pandemic has made the world's wealthiest far richer but has led to more people living in poverty, according to the charity Oxfam.
Lower incomes for the world's poorest contributed to the death of 21,000 people each day, its report claims.
But the world's 10 richest men have more than doubled their collective fortunes since March 2020, Oxfam said.
Oxfam typically releases a report on global inequality at the start of the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.
That event usually sees thousands of corporate and political leaders, celebrities, campaigners, economists and journalists gather in the Swiss ski resort for panel discussions, drinks parties and schmoozing.
However for the second year running, the meeting (scheduled for this week) will be online-only after the emergence of the Omicron variant derailed plans to return to an in-person event.

This week's discussions will include the likely future path of the pandemic, vaccine equity and the energy transition.
Danny Sriskandarajah, Oxfam GB's chief executive, said the charity timed the report each year to coincide with Davos to attract the attention of economic, business and political elites.
"This year, what's happening is off the scale," he said. "There's been a new billionaire created almost every day during this pandemic, meanwhile 99% of the world's population are worse off because of lockdowns, lower international trade, less international tourism, and as a result of that, 160 million more people have been pushed into poverty."
"Something is deeply flawed with our economic system," he added.
According to Forbes figures cited by the charity, the world's 10 richest men are: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault and family, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Ballmer and Warren Buffet.
While collectively their wealth grew from $700bn to $1.5tn, there is significant variation between them, with Mr Musk's fortune growing by more than 1,000%, while Mr Gates' rose by a more modest 30%.

How does Oxfam work out the figures?​

Oxfam's report is based on data from the Forbes Billionaires List and the annual Credit Suisse Global Wealth report, which gives the distribution of global wealth going back to 2000.
The Forbes survey uses the value of an individual's assets, mainly property and land, minus debts, to determine what he or she "owns". The data excludes wages or income.
The methodology has been criticised in the past as it means that a student with high debts, but with high future earning potential, for example, would be considered poor under the criteria used.
Oxfam also says that due to the fact prices have risen during the pandemic, it has adjusted for inflation using the US Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks how fast the cost of living has is increasing over time.

Oxfam's report, which was also based on data from the World Bank, said a lack of access to healthcare, hunger, gender-based violence and climate breakdown contributed to one death every four seconds.
It said 160 million more people were living on less than $5.50 (£4.02) a day than would have been without the impact of the Covid pandemic.
The World Bank uses $5.50 a day as a measure of poverty in upper-middle-income countries.
The report also says:
  • The pandemic is forcing developing countries to slash social spending as national debts rise
  • Gender equality has been set back, with 13 million fewer women in work now than in 2019 and over 20 million girls at risk of never returning to school
  • Ethnic minority groups have been hardest by Covid, including UK Bangladeshis and the US's black population
"Even during a global crisis our unfair economic systems manage to deliver eye-watering windfalls for the wealthiest but fail to protect the poorest," Mr Sriskandarajah said.
He said political leaders now had an historic opportunity to back bolder economic strategies to "change the deadly course we are on".

That should include more progressive tax regimes, which impose higher levies on capital and wealth, with the revenue spent on "quality universal healthcare and social protection for all" Mr Sriskandarajah said.
Oxfam is also calling for the intellectual property rights on Covid-19 vaccines to be waived to enable wider production and faster distribution.
Earlier this month the president of the World Bank, David Malpass, voiced his concerns over widening global inequality, arguing the impact of inflation and measures to tackle it were likely to cause more damage to poorer countries.
"The outlook for the weaker countries is still to fall further and further behind," he said.

I would argue this is the biggest negative impact of our covid response yet. 21,000 daily deaths from reduced incomes eclipses covid tallies, which never got about 18k a day globally, and for the majority of the pandemic have been below 10k. 160 million extra people put into poverty worldwide as well, and then of course the deepening inequality fuelled by billionaires being boosted. Now being on the left myself, I strongly oppose the current economic system we have and believe more needs doing to reduce inequality. However, the way we've responded is definitely not helpful towards this, and this revelation really needs to hit home to many of those who've supported restrictions, including on the left, who blindingly supported lockdowns, etc. for what was thought to be public good.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

kristiang85

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2018
Messages
2,657
Well, many of us here predicted this from the beginning. The restrictions implemented here and around the world always disproportionately affected the poorer in society. Not to mention the obsession with COVID taking funding and research away from other conditions that do kill lots of people in the developing world especially.

Poverty as a killer is being very much forgotten. It will also be an important factor as we ramp up measures to stop climate change - there is a school of thought that the poverty such measures will being to large swathes of the population will kill more than climate change will. It's probably happening already, given the rises in energy prices as there is a shift towards green energy, and families are going cold this winter.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
While slightly tangential to 'poverty' per se, problematic drinking is certainly something that causes/exacerbates poverty. Here's yet another entirely predictable consequence:

https://www.theguardian.com/society...armful-levels-of-alcohol-at-home-experts-warn
Millions in UK drinking harmful levels of alcohol at home, experts warn
Switch to drinking at home rather than in pubs during Covid pandemic partly to blame

Prof Julia Sinclair, the chair of the addictions faculty at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said the switch to drinking at home during the Covid pandemic was partly to blame for the rise, with drinking sessions sometimes lasting several hours longer than they would in a pub.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,042
Location
Taunton or Kent
Poverty as a killer is being very much forgotten. It will also be an important factor as we ramp up measures to stop climate change - there is a school of thought that the poverty such measures will being to large swathes of the population will kill more than climate change will. It's probably happening already, given the rises in energy prices as there is a shift towards green energy, and families are going cold this winter.
Two things to note here: firstly there'll be people who quietly think this is a good thing, because they'll cite overpopulation as the biggest cause of climate change. Second, under the current economic system the logic applies, but I'd argue that poverty resulting from climate change policy killing more than actual climate change is a failure of the economic system currently in place, and should be changed to someone more supportive of the environment, poverty and other major concerns. In the process we might also to things that prevent and manage future pandemics better too.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,323
Location
Stirlingshire
What about people who don't get proper sick pay - only SSP at £96 odd per week. Hardly an incentive to self-isolate.

TUC were pushing for the value of sick pay to be set at the minimum wage (300/400 pw) but Labour seem to have swept this under the carpet (surprisingly ? )
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,941
What about people who don't get proper sick pay - only SSP at £96 odd per week. Hardly an incentive to self-isolate.

TUC were pushing for the value of sick pay to be set at the minimum wage (300/400 pw) but Labour seem to have swept this under the carpet (surprisingly ? )
I would of thought that the reason Labour, or any other party living in the real world, does not back this is because some companies will find it unaffordable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top