• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Dangerous Goods Train Derailment At West Ealing 05/04/24

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
3,673
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
By definition in the RID (the international Regs that govern transport of dangerous goods by rail) an empty tank that has previously held dangerous goods but is not fully cleaned out is defined as containing dangerous goods albeit the tanks bring empty should be noted on the Transport Document.

IIRC the TOPS train list will show the tanks as D (discharged) rather than E (empty).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
560
Shown as “DG” in left most column and “DIS” in the SPL column….a long with incident instructions further down.
 

The Puddock

Member
Joined
10 Jan 2023
Messages
395
Location
Frog
Who described it as a "dangerous goods train"? If it was empty tanks as mentioned up-thread, it isn't dangerous (at least in terms of its cargo).
Railway tank wagons for the conveyance of dangerous goods have three states - charged (i.e. loaded with product), discharged (i.e. not loaded with product) and purged. We never say they’re ‘empty’.

As per the other replies even when a tank is discharged, significant and dangerous levels of vapour may remain within it. A tank used for conveying dangerous goods is only considered safe if it has been purged, which typically only happens immediate before maintenance or storage. Purging involves cleaning the inside of the tank and cycles of filling and empting it with inert gas until no product or vapour remains. Unless a tank has been issued with a purging certificate then the rail industry will continue to treat it as being discharged but potentially dangerous.

Any problem with a train conveying dangerous goods is classed as a dangerous goods irregularity (for minor stuff like paperwork discrepancies or weeping seals) or a dangerous goods incident. The rail industry still takes dangerous goods very seriously.
 

55002

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2019
Messages
2,876
Location
Ldn
is the loco still there?

edit I see on the track maps it is
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,759
Yes, it is - three wheels derailing would be quite a sight!

Who described it as a "dangerous goods train"? If it was empty tanks as mentioned up-thread, it isn't dangerous (at least in terms of its cargo).
Rest assured an 'empty' train is treated the same as a full train, in fact it can be deemed more dangerous !
 

1955LR

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2019
Messages
242
Location
Hereford
I know from working in the motor industry , that a new fuel tank has no handling issues but any that have had or contain fuel are very carefully handled due to the fire and/or explosion risks . Ones that have contained fuel but have been drained are more dangerous. We used to internally steam them for 24hrs before they were deemed to be safe to handle without special precautions.
 

Samzino

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
1,165
Location
London
I believe the up relief is closed today for the loco recovery. Most likely common knowledge by the time of this post. :D
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,061
Location
Taunton or Kent
How often does a derailment become a meme?


1712527299994.png
(Image of Facebook post of derailed freight train with caption "On the way to make this Saturday really productive.."
 

Top