Hello all, been directed here from elsewhere. Was wondering if you would be able to clarify some matters regarding delay repay. Apologies if this isn't quite the right subforum.
I recently travelled on an LNER service which was forced to make an unscheduled stop to attend to a medical emergency. The result of this was that the final leg of the journey as ticketed was unable to be completed over rail due to the last relevant service having departed the station.
LNER resolved the completion of the journey in terms of avoiding stranding by arranging taxis to complete the journey. However these arrangements meant that the completion of the journey was delayed beyond the 30 minute trigger point for delay repay.
In cases like this, does the operator's responsibility to ensure the journey can be completed stack with their obligations under delay repay, (either for 50%, or 100% in LNER's case), or does the completion of the journey via taxi render the compensatory part of delay repay null and void?
My understanding of delay repay is that it is spiritually in part meant to compensate for inconvenience in the delay existing, and thus could see an argument for that compensation being applicable; equally, I can see the regulations being written in such a way so as to prevent "double dipping" in these cases
Any insight you may have would be greatly appreciated: thank you
I recently travelled on an LNER service which was forced to make an unscheduled stop to attend to a medical emergency. The result of this was that the final leg of the journey as ticketed was unable to be completed over rail due to the last relevant service having departed the station.
LNER resolved the completion of the journey in terms of avoiding stranding by arranging taxis to complete the journey. However these arrangements meant that the completion of the journey was delayed beyond the 30 minute trigger point for delay repay.
In cases like this, does the operator's responsibility to ensure the journey can be completed stack with their obligations under delay repay, (either for 50%, or 100% in LNER's case), or does the completion of the journey via taxi render the compensatory part of delay repay null and void?
My understanding of delay repay is that it is spiritually in part meant to compensate for inconvenience in the delay existing, and thus could see an argument for that compensation being applicable; equally, I can see the regulations being written in such a way so as to prevent "double dipping" in these cases
Any insight you may have would be greatly appreciated: thank you