• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Details instead of penalty fare

Status
Not open for further replies.

torqkill

New Member
Joined
30 Jul 2024
Messages
4
Location
Finsbury park
I was travelling home from work after a long day. I saw the barriers open and walked through, very foolish. There was a tfl inspector and I expected to be issued a penalty fare. Instead, he phoned TFL and then he took my details including a description of me.

I am now expecting a letter in the post. I wondered if people could tell me why I didn't just get a penalty fare, which I would have just paid. I make the same journey almost every day, I always tap in and out, my oyster journey history shows this. I spend around £100 a month with a very consistent commute pattern.

I was issued a penalty fare several years ago, which I paid. I hadn't tapped in at Victoria and walked straight into a revenue inspector, very silly of me. Could this be the reason why? I'd have thought it being one penalty from over 3 years ago that I wouldn't be classed as any kind of repeat offender.

Does anyone also know what the next steps are? Is there a chance of settling out of court or just getting a warning?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
16,247
Welcome to the forum!

There is no automatic right to a Penalty Fare. TfL take a robust approach to fare evasion and their normal response is to prosecute under the TfL Byelaws. TfL don't offer out of court settlements but in limited cases they do sometimes give a formal warning.

They will send a Verification Letter to you in the next few weeks asking whether you confirm or deny the offence. This letter is you opportunity to tell TfL about anything you want them to take into account before they decide how to proceed. I suggest reading TfL's Revenue Enforcement & Prosecutions Policy to understand the sort of things the sort of things that TfL take into account when deciding whether or not to prosecute.


When it arrives, post a copy of the Verification Letter and your draft reply in this thread (but do redact any personal details) and forum members will be happy to proof read it for you.
 

pwharley

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2011
Messages
45
I was travelling home from work after a long day. I saw the barriers open and walked through, very foolish. There was a tfl inspector and I expected to be issued a penalty fare. Instead, he phoned TFL and then he took my details including a description of me.
Was this before you boarded any train?
If so, the offence would be entering a Compulsory Ticket Area without a ticket (assuming the station is covered by a CTA scheme). Can you advise the name of the station where you encountered the Inspector and where he/she was?
 

torqkill

New Member
Joined
30 Jul 2024
Messages
4
Location
Finsbury park
It was after I boarded the train, he was going down the train checking everyone's cards. It was in Overground train.


Welcome to the forum!

There is no automatic right to a Penalty Fare. TfL take a robust approach to fare evasion and their normal response is to prosecute under the TfL Byelaws. TfL don't offer out of court settlements but in limited cases they do sometimes give a formal warning.

They will send a Verification Letter to you in the next few weeks asking whether you confirm or deny the offence. This letter is you opportunity to tell TfL about anything you want them to take into account before they decide how to proceed. I suggest reading TfL's Revenue Enforcement & Prosecutions Policy to understand the sort of things the sort of things that TfL take into account when deciding whether or not to prosecute.


When it arrives, post a copy of the Verification Letter and your draft reply in this thread (but do redact any personal details) and forum members will be happy to proof read it for you.
From reading through that guidance it appears as if my previous penalty fare will outweigh any mitigating circumstances, of which there aren't many. Saying I had a very long and stressful day in my NHS job probably won't cut it, I walked straight through the barriers, as will be seen on any CCTV.

With that being in mind, and depending on what the letter says, I just want to be as compliant as possible with any process.

Hoping I can avoid the maximum penalties, but I have no idea

Was this before you boarded any train?
If so, the offence would be entering a Compulsory Ticket Area without a ticket (assuming the station is covered by a CTA scheme). Can you advise the name of the station where you encountered the Inspector and where he/she was?
It was after I boarded the train, he was going down the train checking everyone's cards. It was an Overground train.

Also if anyone could tell me what a fine relative to salary means, I'd be very grateful. As in, what's their calculation for deciding that? And also, can any fines be paid monthly or so they expect it all in one go? Thanks
 
Last edited:

AlbertBeale

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
3,188
Location
London
If you got a Penalty Fare before, when simply trying to avoid payment, then you were lucky.

Penalty Fares - where they exist and are a possibility - are intended for people who seem to have made a genuine error, not for deliberate fare evasion. (The extra cost of a PF being intended as a deterrent to people being careless.)

Where people travel without a valid ticket in cases where it seems they were simply trying not to pay, reporting for possible prosecution is the norm. If it's TfL, rather than another railway company, the chance (once you hear from them) of successfully asking them to consider an out-of-court settlment instead of a prosecution is - as has been said above - very low indeed.

And there's no point in telling them "but I pay my fares usually" (which you point out above); the fact that there were other occasions you weren't dishonest doesn't make your dishonesty on another occasion any less. If you pay for your shopping for weeks, then one day you shoplift, telling a court, "but I often do pay for my shopping" will cut no ice in terms of saving you from conviction for the time you did shoplift.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,651
What station did you board the train at?

"Fine relative to salary" means that any fine (if issued) will be based upon your salary. A fine can only be issued by a court.

Wait for the letter and hope Tfl agree to an out of court settlement. Others here will tell you how likely/unlikely this might be
TfL don't do Out of Court Settlements. In very exceptional circumstances they issue a final warning, although I can't see anything in the OP's case to suggest that it might be one of the exceptions.
 

torqkill

New Member
Joined
30 Jul 2024
Messages
4
Location
Finsbury park
Further to this, when asked for my details when stopped, I gave my correct name and address to the inspector, but I gave my date of birth in the American format. Correct month and day, just the wrong way round.

To avoid any risk of being accused of giving false details, I sent a follow up email the following day to the fare evasion email address giving the time and location of the stop and confirming all of my details with them (full name, address, date of birth in UK format, phone number).

They've now responded saying:

They cannot find the case in question.
They're asking for the following:
The TfL Case Number.
Address given at the time to the Inspector

I never received a case number or any kind of reference from the inspector. And the address in my follow up email was the same as the one I gave the inspector. They also have my address from my oyster card which he scanned.

So I'm very confused as to why they can't find any record.

Any advice on how to respond?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
24,454
Location
LBK
It could be that the inspector hasn't submitted their report yet, hence there is no record of any case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top