• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Does HS2 Still Need 400m Trains?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
400m trains would use 400m platforms. You wouldn't order them otherwise.
Freight trains can be up to 775m on the UK network, so a 400m passenger train isn't going to be a huge issue.


A 390/1 fits 589 people into 265m of train. An 801/2 can get 611 people into only 234m of train. The Azuma also has all of those features you mentioned on the Pendolino.
Pendolino 390/1 coaches consist of 145 first or SP + 444 standard in 11 coaches, with 4 coaches in 2+1 seating
Azuma 801/2 consists of 101 first and 510 standard, only 2.5 coaches are in 2+1 seating
Pendolino is more premium heavy. If 2 of the first/SP coach on 390/1 is converted to standard, there can be 50-60 more seats
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GJMarshy

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2023
Messages
116
Location
Manchester
400m trains are always preferable because they have so much capacity, yet take up little timetabling space compared to more frequent shorter sets.

Maybe there’s something to be said for running 260m sets (11 car pendolino length) to northern outposts of HS2 in future, supposing it’s possible to timetable more in.

Again thoigh, it hinges on Euston to turn them all around. (And curzon St to an extent)
 

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
400m trains are always preferable because they have so much capacity, yet take up little timetabling space compared to more frequent shorter sets.

Maybe there’s something to be said for running 260m sets (11 car pendolino length) to northern outposts of HS2 in future, supposing it’s possible to timetable more in.

Again thoigh, it hinges on Euston to turn them all around. (And curzon St to an extent)
400m is impractical in classic line stations without a spending huge to expand the station.
250m-300m are basically the longest platform you can find in a major station in the Northwest and Scotland.

Given that a great portion of HS2 trains will be through to NW/Scotland, and if there is no significant budget to expand the stations to accommodate 400m as it stays,
it is more efficient to have 250m trains (10 coaches HS2 stock) compare to 200m trains (8 coaches trains currently being ordered)
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Pendolino 390/1 coaches consist of 145 first or SP + 444 standard in 11 coaches, with 4 coaches in 2+1 seating
Azuma 801/2 consists of 101 first and 510 standard, only 2.5 coaches are in 2+1 seating
Pendolino is more premium heavy. If 2 of the first/SP coach on 390/1 is converted to standard, there can be 50-60 more seats

11 car Pendolinos now only have 2.5 coaches First. The end coach is half a coach.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,544
11 car Pendolinos now only have 2.5 coaches First. The end coach is half a coach.
You could also add another coach of First to the Azuma to make a comparable number of seats of 2+1 and still be (slightly) shorter than the Pendolino.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
You could also add another coach of First to the Azuma to make a comparable number of seats of 2+1 and still be (slightly) shorter than the Pendolino.

The other difference with the 80x is that it has fewer door vestibules per unit length, which use up a metre or so each - it's two per coach, the Pendolino has 22 and the 9 car 80x has 18. (In the Pendolino the end ones are staff only but they still exist and use up space). Also fewer couplings/gaps between coaches.

I suppose the HS2 units will be 25m vehicles (80x are 26m, Pendolinos 24m except the end vehicles which are 25) so it's in the middle there.
 

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
11 car Pendolinos now only have 2.5 coaches First. The end coach is half a coach.
The refurbished ones has 607 seats. I think Azuma and Pendolino are very similar in terms of space efficiency.
Azuma edges it with longer coaches, while Pendolino has slightly large shop area and mid coach luggage rack, etc.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,892
Location
SE London
The other difference with the 80x is that it has fewer door vestibules per unit length, which use up a metre or so each - it's two per coach, the Pendolino has 22 and the 9 car 80x has 18. (In the Pendolino the end ones are staff only but they still exist and use up space).

One of them is also for the bike space (although it requires a member of staff to open it for you).

I'm not convinced that two door vestibules - one at each end of the train - has that much impact on seating capacity.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,913
Location
Torbay
Freight trains can be up to 775m on the UK network, so a 400m passenger train isn't going to be a huge issue.
On plain unidirectional track, agreed. It's around stations and junctions where the problems occur, especially large station throat junctions close to platform ends. Junctions can be expensive and sometimes practically impossible to move if also constrained by tunnels, major bridges etc, or to gain sufficient standage, a geographic route divergence needs a complete new branching alignment further out that cuts across some desirable or irreplaceable historic neighbouring property.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,234
Won’t HS significantly increase the Birmingham-London market, particularly with a parkway station for a wide area (also adding in those transferring from Warwick Parkway etc)
Don’t know the area well but won’t a fast direct train also create/increase an Interchange market into Birmingham?
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
2,627
Location
Nottingham
Won’t HS significantly increase the Birmingham-London market, particularly with a parkway station for a wide area (also adding in those transferring from Warwick Parkway etc)
Undoubtedly

Don’t know the area well but won’t a fast direct train also create/increase an Interchange market into Birmingham?
Possibly, but the indicative timetable in the Business Case didn't show all that many HS2 trains actually stopping at the Interchange station. But who knows what will happen in actuality?
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Undoubtedly


Possibly, but the indicative timetable in the Business Case didn't show all that many HS2 trains actually stopping at the Interchange station. But who knows what will happen in actuality?
I would imagine all trains stopping at Solihull Interchange, so that passengers can transfer to Birmingham Airport. Admittedly, there would be more passengers changing at Solihull Interchange southbound I suspect, than Northbound.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
3,245
Location
belfast
An 11 car Pendolino is 265m with a very inefficient interior layout. A 275 or 300m HS2 unit could fit in a lot more seats.

But this really only applies to Manchester and possibly Scotland. Birmingham, the only part presently to get 400m trains, doesn't require capacity to be more than doubled (2tph at 265m vs. 3tph at 400m) - people would I think rather LNR and/or Chiltern upped their cheaper capacity. Indeed, if the Chiltern was wired and they just ran 12.350 or 10.730 semifast three times an hour at present prices they'd walk all over the Birmingham market now we have primarily a leisure railway.
Chiltern should be focused on serving their intermediate market, not London-Birmingham. Plus the HS2 capacity should be cheaper anyway
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,625
I would imagine all trains stopping at Solihull Interchange, so that passengers can transfer to Birmingham Airport. Admittedly, there would be more passengers changing at Solihull Interchange southbound I suspect, than Northbound.
Its not Solihull Interchange. There are a significant amount of signs on the new pieces of road around there that have Birmingham Interchange covered over.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Chiltern should be focused on serving their intermediate market, not London-Birmingham.

A 3tph semifast Moor St to Marylebone EMU service would do both quite effectively, just like the similar LNR services do.

Plus the HS2 capacity should be cheaper anyway

People keep saying this, but is there one single high speed railway in the entire world that isn't sold as a premium product?

Its not Solihull Interchange. There are a significant amount of signs on the new pieces of road around there that have Birmingham Interchange covered over.

TBH I thought that was a bit of a jape along the lines of calling Manchester Airport "Ringway".
 

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
Won’t HS significantly increase the Birmingham-London market, particularly with a parkway station for a wide area (also adding in those transferring from Warwick Parkway etc)
Don’t know the area well but won’t a fast direct train also create/increase an Interchange market into Birmingham?
Birmingham Curzon Street is a dead end station and it require a bit of walking to New Street, so I don't think people would like to transfer to another train there.
Birmingham International is an undeveloped area Northeast of National Exhibition Centre. It will require a ride on APM to go to Birmingham Airport.
Again, it is not attractive for train to train transfer. It isn't a major station which all trains plan to stop either - it could end up like Ashford or Ebbsfleet on HS1.
The only advantage of Birmingham International is car to train interchange, but not really for connecting to another train.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,947
Birmingham Curzon Street is a dead end station and it require a bit of walking to New Street, so I don't think people would like to transfer to another train there.
Curzon Street is very close to Moor Street, it should connect well particularly if the proposed connection gets built. If the Cmp Hill lines get done there was some talk of moving some XC services over to Moor Street.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Birmingham Curzon Street is a dead end station and it require a bit of walking to New Street, so I don't think people would like to transfer to another train there.

It's not that far, though they will have to tidy up the manky foot tunnel which is always full of vagrants. It's no different to Liverpool Lime St to Liverpool Central, which loads of people do all the time, or indeed Moor St to/from New St.

However there are very few cases other than interchange to local services (many of which are from Moor St anyway*, which may as well be the same station) where you would want to change at Birmingham, as most major places have direct service to London anyway via a different route.

* People forget that while interchange to New St is degraded, interchange to the Snow Hill Lines is considerably upgraded - Curzon St and Moor St are right next to each other in the same way as Kings Cross and St Pancras. Indeed, I wonder if more local stations are served from Moor St than New St? And connecting onto e.g. XC is a bit irrelevant, as XC will generally take you places that have a direct London service anyway. The obvious one that would be considerably degraded and doesn't have a direct London service is connections to the Cambrian, but those people could still choose to use classic line services if preferred.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
It's not that far, though they will have to tidy up the manky foot tunnel which is always full of vagrants. It's no different to Liverpool Lime St to Liverpool Central, which loads of people do all the time, or indeed Moor St to/from New St.

However there are very few cases other than interchange to local services (many of which are from Moor St anyway*, which may as well be the same station) where you would want to change at Birmingham, as most major places have direct service to London anyway via a different route.

* People forget that while interchange to New St is degraded, interchange to the Snow Hill Lines is considerably upgraded - Curzon St and Moor St are right next to each other in the same way as Kings Cross and St Pancras. Indeed, I wonder if more local stations are served from Moor St than New St? And connecting onto e.g. XC is a bit irrelevant, as XC will generally take you places that have a direct London service anyway. The obvious one that would be considerably degraded and doesn't have a direct London service is connections to the Cambrian, but those people could still choose to use classic line services if preferred.
Isn't there also plans to be building the Midlands Metro to be going to Curzon Street from New Street, which passengers will be able to pickup if they have heavy luggage to transport?
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,892
Location
SE London
Ummm... ummm... On a quick check of Google maps, I make the distance from the entrance to New Street to the entrance to Curzon Street to be about 500m. So, not much more than the distance people will have to walk along the platform at Curzon Street if their seat is at the far end of the train. While I appreciate that walking along a platform isn't quite the same as walking along the street, it seems to me a bit odd to complain about the New Street-Curzon Street distance if at the same time you're defending 400m trains ;)

And yes it will be possible to get from New Street to Curzon Street by tram (although probably not to the other end of the Curzon Street platforms :D ), although if train tickets don't allow you to travel on the tram (so far I've not heard of any plans to allow that) that might be of limited usefulness.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,234
The only advantage of Birmingham International is car to train interchange, but not really for connecting to another train.
You may have misunderstood me - I was thinking about people wanting to go to Birmingham driving to Interchange for a fast train straight in from a station with car parks next to major roads. If there is such a market then you could sell a London-Birmingham seat twice.
The obvious one that would be considerably degraded and doesn't have a direct London service is connections to the Cambrian, but those people could still choose to use classic line services if preferred.
Will it be quicker to stay on TfW trains (and maybe others) to Interchange and get HS2 (and avoid changing at New Street!) or will the people mover thing just take too long?
What’s the Euston-Interchange v Euston-International time comparison like?
If you were heading for Heathrow or Lizzie destinations it might be pretty attractive.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Will it be quicker to stay on TfW trains (and maybe others) to Interchange and get HS2 (and avoid changing at New Street!) or will the people mover thing just take too long?

You'd also be able to stay on TfW trains and change at Intl onto a classic line fast service. I suspect the minimal hassle of this would make it a popular option.

Of course who's to say TfW wouldn't bid for classic line paths to London?
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,913
Location
Torbay
So about a kilometre in total, then. Airports provide travelators for that sort of distance.
I have often suggested moving walkways for the middle, covered section of St.Martin's Queensway. Efforts to improve the pedestrian route between New St. and Curzon St. will also benefit New St.'s connection with Moor St. of course, welding the three terminals into 'one station' as authorities have dubbed the broader complex.
An idea I sketched back in 2012 - http://townend.me/files/brumlink.pdf
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I have often suggested moving walkways for the middle, covered section of St.Martin's Queensway. Efforts to improve the pedestrian route between New St. and Curzon St. will also benefit New St.'s connection with Moor St. of course, welding the three terminals into 'one station' as authorities have dubbed the broader complex.
An idea I sketched back in 2012 - http://townend.me/files/brumlink.pdf

I could definitely see sense in boxing in that walkway and adding travelators and better lighting, though it would require 24/7 security presence.
 

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
Ummm... ummm... On a quick check of Google maps, I make the distance from the entrance to New Street to the entrance to Curzon Street to be about 500m. So, not much more than the distance people will have to walk along the platform at Curzon Street if their seat is at the far end of the train. While I appreciate that walking along a platform isn't quite the same as walking along the street, it seems to me a bit odd to complain about the New Street-Curzon Street distance if at the same time you're defending 400m trains ;)

And yes it will be possible to get from New Street to Curzon Street by tram (although probably not to the other end of the Curzon Street platforms :D ), although if train tickets don't allow you to travel on the tram (so far I've not heard of any plans to allow that) that might be of limited usefulness.
Firstly I am against 400m trains :D
Secondly I agree 500m can be perfectly walkable, but assume you are travelling on the tube and you're planning the trip with a tube map.
Would you choose an out-of-station transfer over a same station transfer? Personally I'd prefer same station transfer even if it will take a bit longer.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,074
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Firstly I am against 400m trains :D
Secondly I agree 500m can be perfectly walkable, but assume you are travelling on the tube and you're planning the trip with a tube map.
Would you choose an out-of-station transfer over a same station transfer? Personally I'd prefer same station transfer even if it will take a bit longer.

Most people probably would, but in effect you're just swapping Moor St for New St in having that. It's not in the middle of nowhere, it may as well be part of Moor St. And Moor St carries a significant proportion of Birmingham's local service.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,947
Most people probably would, but in effect you're just swapping Moor St for New St in having that. It's not in the middle of nowhere, it may as well be part of Moor St. And Moor St carries a significant proportion of Birmingham's local service.
The WMCA want better integration with Moor St, here is what is proposed:

birmingham-moor-street-vision-1.jpg


I'd personally like Birmingham Snow Hill renamed to just Snow Hill now it's a fairly inconsequential station. Snow Hill/Moor Street/Curzon Street/New Street all being treated like important termini will be confusing for irregular travellers, particularly when Moor Street and Curzon Street are next door.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Ummm... ummm... On a quick check of Google maps, I make the distance from the entrance to New Street to the entrance to Curzon Street to be about 500m. So, not much more than the distance people will have to walk along the platform at Curzon Street if their seat is at the far end of the train. While I appreciate that walking along a platform isn't quite the same as walking along the street, it seems to me a bit odd to complain about the New Street-Curzon Street distance if at the same time you're defending 400m trains ;)

And yes it will be possible to get from New Street to Curzon Street by tram (although probably not to the other end of the Curzon Street platforms :D ), although if train tickets don't allow you to travel on the tram (so far I've not heard of any plans to allow that) that might be of limited usefulness.
While it maybe such that people can walk between New Street to Curzon Street, what about those that have difficulty in working or are disabled?

I have often suggested moving walkways for the middle, covered section of St.Martin's Queensway. Efforts to improve the pedestrian route between New St. and Curzon St. will also benefit New St.'s connection with Moor St. of course, welding the three terminals into 'one station' as authorities have dubbed the broader complex.
An idea I sketched back in 2012 - http://townend.me/files/brumlink.pdf
A moving walkway would be a good idea, such that it could help those that are disabled with either limited ability to walk or having to go round in a wheelchair. This would be especially so also with those moving large amounts of luggage between the stations.

It maybe me, but many seem to forget the elderly and disabled, who need methods of helping them get from A to B, more so than the average fit person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top