I would appreciate if someone would offer some perspective regarding difficulties searching trains times and validities via various websites for a Kidsgrove to Arbroath first class off peak return.
BRfares. Com shows a fare of £216.50 (via Crewe) inclusive of 34% railcard discount. The National Rail website also shows this £216.50 fare when you initially start the search, but only for the outbound sector. When you then go to select the return train times, it defaults to two anytime first class singles at a much higher fare of 2 x £170.60 (£340.20) and no option to select a first class off peak return. I’m certain that the older version of the National Rail website did give this option, even where it wasn’t the cheapest. It also defaults to two first class anytime singles required on certain services when returning via Glasgow, even though this does not involve travel on LNER trains.
The only restrictions I can see for this ticket is condition 2V Cross Country - outward and return journeys not permitted before 0930 Monday to Friday. The dates of travel outward will be 20th February and return 25th February, all after 0930, although the actual dates are irrelevant as I want the flexibility regarding timings, dates, routes etc that that an off peak return offers. The fare is set by Avanti West Coast routed via Crewe and the main sector from Crewe to Edinburgh will involve travel with them and onward with LNER between Edinburgh and Abroath, and I should be able to do so with this ticket. I don’t want advance tickets or to travel with TPE.
I am aware of single leg pricing on fares set by LNER, but this does not (or should not?) apply for this particular journey as it falls outside of the ‘fares simplification’ trial. Effectively, it forces (dupes) people into purchasing two higher priced Anytime singles where an off peak return should suffice. I get this same result of defaulting to two anytime singles when I check Avanti, LNER, Train Line and other websites. The LNWR website, although initially also directing you towards two anytime singles, also offers the option of purchasing an off peak return for this trip, whereas the others don’t appear to.
(I get similar results when I check fares to Abroath from Crewe/Warrington/Wigan/Preston etc - i.e no cheaper first class off peak return offered (even though they exist), only either two anytime first singles or an anytime and advance single combination)
The other issue is that if you were gullible enough to select to purchase the two anytime singles at the same time, you would be effectively restricting yourself to make the return trip on or within two days of the date on the ticket, whereas the much cheaper off peak ticket gives you the full flexibility to travel and break the journey on any date within one month of the outward trip, and at a much lower price.
Intriguingly, when I check fares for this same trip based on standard off peak returns for £118.90, it does shows it as being valid outward and return on the same off peak services that it showed first class off peak returns not to be valid on, whether travelling via Glasgow or Edinburgh.
I have checked the TVM at Kidsgrove Station and have confirmed that this £216.50 first class off peak return is available for purchase there, which is how I will be buying the ticket, but I just want to make doubly sure beforehand that I will have no issues in using this ticket onboard LNER in first class.
Might these discrepancies be explained by an undetected ‘glitch’ or ‘error’ on the fares system? Am I missing out something when conducting these fares searches? Or am I being overly cynical in thinking LNER have deliberately configured the system beyond their supposed remit so as to dupe the unwary into buying higher priced anytime first class singles when they don’t need to ? I can’t find anything on the LNER website to indicate that first class off peak return fares are NOT valid on their services when travelling within the 2V fare off peak restriction times, or why they shouldn’t be.
I have emailed separately LNER about this and await a reply with interest, hoping to have something in writing to produce if challenged and to have corrected. To me, this is wrong and needs to be highlighted and addressed.
Thanking you in anticipation of your input.
BRfares. Com shows a fare of £216.50 (via Crewe) inclusive of 34% railcard discount. The National Rail website also shows this £216.50 fare when you initially start the search, but only for the outbound sector. When you then go to select the return train times, it defaults to two anytime first class singles at a much higher fare of 2 x £170.60 (£340.20) and no option to select a first class off peak return. I’m certain that the older version of the National Rail website did give this option, even where it wasn’t the cheapest. It also defaults to two first class anytime singles required on certain services when returning via Glasgow, even though this does not involve travel on LNER trains.
The only restrictions I can see for this ticket is condition 2V Cross Country - outward and return journeys not permitted before 0930 Monday to Friday. The dates of travel outward will be 20th February and return 25th February, all after 0930, although the actual dates are irrelevant as I want the flexibility regarding timings, dates, routes etc that that an off peak return offers. The fare is set by Avanti West Coast routed via Crewe and the main sector from Crewe to Edinburgh will involve travel with them and onward with LNER between Edinburgh and Abroath, and I should be able to do so with this ticket. I don’t want advance tickets or to travel with TPE.
I am aware of single leg pricing on fares set by LNER, but this does not (or should not?) apply for this particular journey as it falls outside of the ‘fares simplification’ trial. Effectively, it forces (dupes) people into purchasing two higher priced Anytime singles where an off peak return should suffice. I get this same result of defaulting to two anytime singles when I check Avanti, LNER, Train Line and other websites. The LNWR website, although initially also directing you towards two anytime singles, also offers the option of purchasing an off peak return for this trip, whereas the others don’t appear to.
(I get similar results when I check fares to Abroath from Crewe/Warrington/Wigan/Preston etc - i.e no cheaper first class off peak return offered (even though they exist), only either two anytime first singles or an anytime and advance single combination)
The other issue is that if you were gullible enough to select to purchase the two anytime singles at the same time, you would be effectively restricting yourself to make the return trip on or within two days of the date on the ticket, whereas the much cheaper off peak ticket gives you the full flexibility to travel and break the journey on any date within one month of the outward trip, and at a much lower price.
Intriguingly, when I check fares for this same trip based on standard off peak returns for £118.90, it does shows it as being valid outward and return on the same off peak services that it showed first class off peak returns not to be valid on, whether travelling via Glasgow or Edinburgh.
I have checked the TVM at Kidsgrove Station and have confirmed that this £216.50 first class off peak return is available for purchase there, which is how I will be buying the ticket, but I just want to make doubly sure beforehand that I will have no issues in using this ticket onboard LNER in first class.
Might these discrepancies be explained by an undetected ‘glitch’ or ‘error’ on the fares system? Am I missing out something when conducting these fares searches? Or am I being overly cynical in thinking LNER have deliberately configured the system beyond their supposed remit so as to dupe the unwary into buying higher priced anytime first class singles when they don’t need to ? I can’t find anything on the LNER website to indicate that first class off peak return fares are NOT valid on their services when travelling within the 2V fare off peak restriction times, or why they shouldn’t be.
I have emailed separately LNER about this and await a reply with interest, hoping to have something in writing to produce if challenged and to have corrected. To me, this is wrong and needs to be highlighted and addressed.
Thanking you in anticipation of your input.