THarris123
Established Member
That would be nice, especially if its E400mmcs or Streetdeckers like the Airlink 100 in Edinburgh.
I've heard rumours, but can't say.
That would be nice, especially if its E400mmcs or Streetdeckers like the Airlink 100 in Edinburgh.
Will there still be a need for the A2 with the new WSM flyer running?
It can't use those, if it is going to use the metrobus route it HAS to be single deckers.
Really? I'd heard it was certain to be a fleet of Neoplan Jumbocruisers for both the Bristol and Weston Flyer!!
It has been suggested, but NOT confirmed, the Bristol Flyer will receive new Scania chasis E400s and some of the existing fleet will be refurbished for use by Weston. The ones not use for the Weston Flyer, having the luggage racks removed, refurbished and upseated for use by Weston on country work.
Apparently, but I don't know how true it is, low height deckers can be operated on the Ashton and of Metrobus.
It has been suggested, but NOT confirmed, the Bristol Flyer will receive new Scania chasis E400s and some of the existing fleet will be refurbished for use by Weston. The ones not use for the Weston Flyer, having the luggage racks removed, refurbished and upseated for use by Weston on country work.
Apparently, but I don't know how true it is, low height deckers can be operated on the Ashton and of Metrobus.
It can't use those, if it is going to use the metrobus route it HAS to be single deckers.
Why??
I'm going on published info, that the Long Ashton metrobus route can only accept single deckers, due to the Ashton Ave swing bridge. And that the Airport service would use the metrobus route.
So what you're saying is that assuming the Airport service will use the Long Ashton route AND that because it uses Ashton Avenue bridge, then the rumour of double deckers would have to be incorrect?
So we have two options, do we?
A rumour that deckers will be used and because of that, they would have to use the existing route?
Alternatively, if they wish to use the Metrobus route out to Long Ashton, as was intimated before, then they would have to use single decks?
read this
https://www.bristolairport.co.uk/to-and-from-the-airport/south-bristol-link-questions-and-answers
: What does it mean for passengers travelling to and from Bristol Airport? Will this reduce journey times?
The SBL will improve access to Bristol Airport for passengers travelling by car from the north, east and west, although journey time reductions may be tempered in the short term by delays caused by road improvement works elsewhere in the local area. On completion of the MetroBus network, the route of the Airport Flyer Express bus service will be reviewed to make use of the South Bristol Link and the Ashton Vale to Temple Meads (AVTM) MetroBus route.
Ooo yes. Must use the waste-of-money Metrobus route mustn't we? :roll:On completion of the MetroBus network, the route of the Airport Flyer Express bus service will be reviewed to make use of the South Bristol Link and the Ashton Vale to Temple Meads (AVTM) MetroBus route.
Ooo yes. Must use the waste-of-money Metrobus route mustn't we? :roll:
I'm not sure using double deckers on the A1 would be the best idea anyway. Most passengers have luggage which leads to two options:
- Hauling your luggage up the stairs
- Leaving your luggage unattended downstairs
Given that double deckers have a far lower downstairs seating capacity than a single decker, this is not ideal.
Therefore, the ideal vehicles for extra capacity would be bendy buses.
If the AVTM route speeds up buses, then why not make use? It's in the Airport's interests to get its staff from south Bristol to work, so I'm sure alternatives (staff minibuses etc) will be provided.
I'm not so convinced by the argument against deckers in so far as the A4 uses them. More appropriately, the London Transport Airbus services used Metrobuses and Olympians out of Heathrow.
However, the speed benefit of the AVTM route would seem to be a sensible enough option. Surely better that than flying back from holiday and then be grinding through Bemmie?
I'm not so convinced by the argument against deckers in so far as the A4 uses them. More appropriately, the London Transport Airbus services used Metrobuses and Olympians out of Heathrow.
However, the speed benefit of the AVTM route would seem to be a sensible enough option. Surely better that than flying back from holiday and then be grinding through Bemmie?
Who knows. One thing is for sure and that is that there are very few things I trust Bristol [....]ty Council on. Transport is certainly not one of them. The money spent on the Metrobus so far has come to in excess of the estimated £200m: last I heard it has passed £215m and was likely to come to £230m which, IMO, is an absurd amount of money to pay for what is essentially a glorified bus route which, at the time of writing, they have no operator for as none will take it on commercially: they were supposed to have an operator in place for 12 months prior to the start of services. I continue to think that the £200m+ would have been far better spent elsewhere. I could go on as to my own idea for what might have been better but this is not the thread to do so.I think Bristol City Council and North Somerset Council persuaded them to use the metrobus route. But how is a good question. Might of been the threat of the council including it in a quality contact, and stipulating fares ect!
Who knows. One thing is for sure and that is that there are very few things I trust Bristol [....]ty Council on. Transport is certainly not one of them. The money spent on the Metrobus so far has come to in excess of the estimated £200m: last I heard it has passed £215m and was likely to come to £230m which, IMO, is an absurd amount of money to pay for what is essentially a glorified bus route which, at the time of writing, they have no operator for as none will take it on commercially: they were supposed to have an operator in place for 12 months prior to the start of services. I continue to think that the £200m+ would have been far better spent elsewhere. I could go on as to my own idea for what might have been better but this is not the thread to do so.
Anyway, back to the A1 Airport bus. The main problem with using the MB route is that the Airport staff who currently use it to get to work will find it not quite so convenient. IMO it would be better to not use the MB route and to maintain the present route instead so that the staff of the Airport continue to have a viable alternative to their cars.
Dave
As Freeview says above, they are reusing the Ashton Avenue swing bridge. The pictures in this article show why double deckers can't be used on this section.
https://travelwest.info/metrobus/metrobus-build/ashton-avenue-swing-bridge
Stupid question but why can't they remove the top girders so that deckers could potentially use it?
The plans for the bridge show restricted height signs for 14'6" in the middle which I guess is why the bus lane is a single track. I think E400's can be 14'1"
Who knows. One thing is for sure and that is that there are very few things I trust Bristol [....]ty Council on. Transport is certainly not one of them. The money spent on the Metrobus so far has come to in excess of the estimated £200m: last I heard it has passed £215m and was likely to come to £230m which, IMO, is an absurd amount of money to pay for what is essentially a glorified bus route which, at the time of writing, they have no operator for as none will take it on commercially: they were supposed to have an operator in place for 12 months prior to the start of services. I continue to think that the £200m+ would have been far better spent elsewhere. I could go on as to my own idea for what might have been better but this is not the thread to do so.
Anyway, back to the A1 Airport bus. The main problem with using the MB route is that the Airport staff who currently use it to get to work will find it not quite so convenient. IMO it would be better to not use the MB route and to maintain the present route instead so that the staff of the Airport continue to have a viable alternative to their cars.
Dave