You could argue the same about the Tories winning four times in a row.That'll be how Labour won three in a row then
You could argue the same about the Tories winning four times in a row.That'll be how Labour won three in a row then
So people that don't support Tory policy are idiots?I suspect the idiots would have voted against her.
I actually remember Labour winning three in a row though. I have no memory of the '92 election, and wasn't even alive for the three Mrs Thatcher won. And speaking of Maggie, I suspect the idiots would have voted against her.
Now where are HST Power and Mojo to back me up on this? Is nice to know I'm not the only "Blue" on here.
I actually remember Labour winning three in a row though. I have no memory of the '92 election, and wasn't even alive for the three Mrs Thatcher won. And speaking of Maggie, I suspect the idiots would have voted against her. .
isn't that Democracy, though? Even if one person doesn't like it, if that's what the majority of the People choose, then that should be accepted, should it not?.
So people that don't support Tory policy are idiots?
What, the intellectuals voted for her after Our Boys whupped the Argies?
Don't forget Old Timer
Quite right. Abolish democracy and have a benevolent dictatorship. I volunteer to be the benevolent dictator.
I does kind of look like I said that doesn't it Not all Labourites are idiots. I know that. I just think they're wrong - to a severe degree.
Trouble is we've not much choice. We can vote for Tory Lite or full Tory. The joys of two barely distinguishable parties
We have had one dictator (if you exclude OC) namely the one and only MRS T
Others though would say the two parties are poles apart.Trouble is we've not much choice. We can vote for Tory Lite or full Tory. The joys of two barely distinguishable parties
We have had one dictator (if you exclude OC) namely the one and only MRS T
Does she have any support in Scotland at all?
Is the Chancellor actually required to be a financial expert? George Osborne's only actual qualification appears to be a 2:1 in Modern History
Quite right. Abolish democracy and have a benevolent dictatorship. I volunteer to be the benevolent dictator.
What definition of dictatorship are you using? She was leader of a party that won three free and fair elections that eneabled her as head of that party to be Prime Minister? How then was she a dictator?
Ollie Cromwell to the Rump Parliament said:"You have sat too long for any good you have been doing lately ... Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"
On the subject of Democracy vs. Dictatorship, and the well known quote attributed to Winnie that's been mentioned at least once, Churchill was really to all intents and purposes a Dictator, wasn't he? He recognised that the only way to get things done was to over-rule the party bickering and the endless cycle of only planning for the next election. And as our other friend Ollie Cromwell has also been brought up, I think his famous quote says it all really.
First time round, maybe. Churchill wasn't party leader when the Conservatives were elected, that was Chamberlain. However, I think there was a sunset clause in the Government of National Unity agreement at the beginning of the war. When hostilities ceased, there would have to be an election. Second time round, he won on his war record, but was half the leader he had been. Hence the ping-pong for a while between Labour and Tory.