• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Class 769 information. (Units no longer with GWR - Off Lease March 23)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,354
An involuntary visit (and stable until it can be rescued) for the 769 on test in the Loco siding at Redhill today which appears to have failed at Redhill today on its return trip from Gatwick.
View attachment 110860
[Screenshot from Open Train Times signalling diagram shows '4CAR' in Redhill Loco Sidings]

769936, blown traction motor / traction package.

Techs attending from Reading to attempt revival first; otherwise will be rescue job.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,325
769936, blown traction motor / traction package.

Techs attending from Reading to attempt revival first; otherwise will be rescue job.
Would you happen to know if it was on diesel or 3rd rail at the time of failure?
 

DownFast

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2021
Messages
41
Location
UK
Would you happen to know if it was on diesel or 3rd rail at the time of failure?
DC (3rd rail). Failed on 3V71 on the way back from Gatwick to Reading. Same unit as failed at Guildford, sounds like a similar failure mode too.

Will this need to return to wolverton or can it be done at reading or eastleigh?
Most likely Reading. The facilities being used at Eastleigh for the ASDO installation aren't set up for things like replacing traction motors.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,243
Location
St Albans
DC (3rd rail). Failed on 3V71 on the way back from Gatwick to Reading. Same unit as failed at Guildford, sounds like a similar failure mode too.


Most likely Reading. The facilities being used at Eastleigh for the ASDO installation aren't set up for things like replacing traction motors.
So really it's effectively a 319 failure mode.
 

Joel_1902

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2021
Messages
12
Location
Knaresborough

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,865
No doubt will add even further delay to getting these units into service
I'm not sure why it would, if it was a traction motor failure as stated - the traction motors are class 319 originals, and it's not unknown for 30+ year old DC motors to fail from time to time.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,354
I can’t see it having any impact on entry into service whatsoever - there still isn’t a single Mainline driver trained on them at this stage; just a very small number of driver managers. Depot drivers and I believe Guards are being trained at present; as I understand there is still no training agreement for Mainline drivers.

Meanwhile 769936 will likely be repaired within a day or so.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
660
Oh so it's keeping the original DC traction equipment, didnt upgrade to AC traction motors like SWT's Class 455s did?
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,243
Location
St Albans
Oh so it's keeping the original DC traction equipment, didnt upgrade to AC traction motors like SWT's Class 455s did?
No. Their replacements (class 700s) were planned before the 455 mod programme was started.
 

tomuk

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2010
Messages
1,953
Being stored in damp sidings and dragged about from works to works isn't good for the heath of DC traction motors. It's best to keep them run in.
 

tomuk

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2010
Messages
1,953
As GWR maintenance at Laira are learning when XC HSTs sit around for a week at a time without use.
Indeed where have the 319s been hanging about? Long Marston, Wolverton, Loughborough, Castle Donnington for quite a long time.
 

Andypandy1968

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2022
Messages
86
Location
Truro
A friend at GWR has said 769s are having problems on the gradients of the NDL and that's just the empty test runs. Little confidence at GWR that a train full of passengers and suitcases just won't make it. Slim to zero chance of the 769s entering service on this route apparently.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,756
A friend at GWR has said 769s are having problems on the gradients of the NDL and that's just the empty test runs. Little confidence at GWR that a train full of passengers and suitcases just won't make it. Slim to zero chance of the 769s entering service on this route apparently.
If they don't enter service on the North Downs Line, it would somewhat blow the point of having them at all. Firstly, 10 3-car 165s would need to be retained at Reading (assuming the current timetable remained in place and wasn't cut back) and there wouldn't be anywhere to use half the 769 fleet.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
2,690
Location
Somerset
If they don't enter service on the North Downs Line, it would somewhat blow the point of having them at all. Firstly, 10 3-car 165s would need to be retained at Reading (assuming the current timetable remained in place and wasn't cut back) and there wouldn't be anywhere to use half the 769 fleet.
Would they provide a temporary answer to "can't Bedwyn at least keep a shuttle to Reading?" question being posed elsewhere. Back to the (very?) old pattern of Newbury "Network Expresses" and Reading - Bedwyn stoppers and thus actually exploiting the AC capability. Obviously that wouldn't free up nearly enough turbos, but it's a start.
 

Andypandy1968

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2022
Messages
86
Location
Truro
Would they provide a temporary answer to "can't Bedwyn at least keep a shuttle to Reading?" question being posed elsewhere. Back to the (very?) old pattern of Newbury "Network Expresses" and Reading - Bedwyn stoppers and thus actually exploiting the AC capability. Obviously that wouldn't free up nearly enough turbos, but it's a start.
Sounds like a plan, why didn't GWR think of that

If they don't enter service on the North Downs Line, it would somewhat blow the point of having them at all. Firstly, 10 3-car 165s would need to be retained at Reading (assuming the current timetable remained in place and wasn't cut back) and there wouldn't be anywhere to use half the 769 fleet.
Exactly, apparently another (unnamed) TOC has shown an interest in them, goodness knows why. Sounds like they are someone high up in GWR vanity project?!
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,751
Apparently you can get pretty good odds in some GWR messrooms of them ever turning a wheel in service
These are the same messrooms (that I frequent) that also had odds of Virgin "taking us over", IET'S never coming, 143's being kept for another 10 years and so on :D
 

warwickshire

On Moderation
Joined
6 Feb 2020
Messages
1,898
Location
leamingtonspa

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
420
Location
Reading
STP 04/03 0934 Long Marston - Eastleigh Works - 5Q11 135 late start/passed Oxford 125 late/Southcote J 106 late 769943 769930
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K03037/2022-03-04/detailed

STP 04/03 1253 Eastleigh Works - Long Marston - pass Eastleigh 82 late/Reading West J 66 late/Wolvercote J 35 late.
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K03038/2022-03-04/detailed
769939 & 769932 heading north (under own power).

Would they provide a temporary answer to "can't Bedwyn at least keep a shuttle to Reading?" question being posed elsewhere. Back to the (very?) old pattern of Newbury "Network Expresses" and Reading - Bedwyn stoppers and thus actually exploiting the AC capability. Obviously that wouldn't free up nearly enough turbos, but it's a start.
particularly as Bedwyn (other than a few peak hour trains) is going to be served by a dmu shuttle to Newbury from May - and not IETs to London, the DfT having decided to use those elsewhere. Bedwyn Trains passenger group circulated this recently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top