• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Class 800

Status
Not open for further replies.

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,218
Location
Reading
On GWR you’ll then need to factor in loss of performance when running on diesel.
I'm not sure what this is intended to imply.

On those sections where diesel power was always to be used - that is on those lines off the end of the electrified network - the line speed limits are such that the trains will not be able to reach 125mile/h anyway, so there will be no loss of performance when compared to an HST. In fact, with the increase in the number of powered axles and the inherent slip-resistance of variable voltage, variable frequency 3 phase drives coupled with the lack of low speed 'grunt' in HSTs the potential exists to improve the timings.

The performance will only be compromised compared to that planned on the sections that are not due to be wired in the immediate future - that is Wootton Bassett / Chippenham to Bristol via Bath and Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads via Filton Bank and the extension from Cardiff to Swansea. Only some of the first route is passed for 125mile/h and none of the latter two routes. There may be some loss in time compared to an HST when hill-climbing, which will however only affect the Up trains, but this will have to be seen in practice.

In the short term - until the Didcot to Cardiff section is energised - there will be no improvement in timings. But history shows that this is not unusual when new traction is introduced - time is given for staff and operations to become used to the new equipment and sufficient is available to enable changes to be made to the whole timetable for that route. In addition timings are such that an HST could be substituted without an effect on performance.

The issue with the Class 80X is not its technical capability but the very expensive way the DfT executed the Intercity Express Programme.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

50031

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2013
Messages
172
That plus the seat handles, although it looks as though this is only inflicted on Standard class, as First looks to have a Brown Strip with White handles, as for what the Standard Class seats are like remains to be seen they don't look comfortable and the seat fabric looks cheap.
Lets see some GWR green headrest covers added to all seats or a new version of the HST antimacassers
 

Olaf

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2014
Messages
1,054
Location
UK
They're not going to recall all the 80x in the Country are they? The impact doesn't bear thinking about if so.

My understanding was that the initial assessment was that the sets were still safe for the imminent introduction, but more recent reports are suggesting that there may be issues with the material that has gone into wheel-sets which is potentially more serious.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,253
My understanding was that the initial assessment was that the sets were still safe for the imminent introduction, but more recent reports are suggesting that there may be issues with the material that has gone into wheel-sets which is potentially more serious.

I'm sure the ORR will have been alerted by Hitachi to any potential issues.

In any case, the pre-series IEP sets have been running many miles on trials under all sorts of conditions and speeds for the past couple of years, which might be expected to have shown up potential problems at some stage.

Of course, test running can never truly replicate the effects of daily operation, but I haven't seen any suggestion so far that IEPs or any of the bullet trains supplied to Japanese railways have given cause for concern - I would have thought 300kmh+ running on Shinkansen routes would have found out flaws at an early stage.
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
The performance will only be compromised compared to that planned on the sections that are not due to be wired in the immediate future - that is Wootton Bassett / Chippenham to Bristol via Bath and Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads via Filton Bank and the extension from Cardiff to Swansea. Only some of the first route is passed for 125mile/h and none of the latter two routes. There may be some loss in time compared to an HST when hill-climbing, which will however only affect the Up trains, but this will have to be seen in practice.

On the down trains, most trains will be heading onto the non-wired section from Wootton Bassett at 125mph will they not? Hence in that direction is primarily becomes a question of whether they can maintain that speed on diesel.
 

D1009

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Messages
3,166
Location
Stoke Gifford
W
On the down trains, most trains will be heading onto the non-wired section from Wootton Bassett at 125mph will they not? Hence in that direction is primarily becomes a question of whether they can maintain that speed on diesel.
(yawn) Wootton Bassett to Thingley Junction is going to be wired, in fact many of the masts are already up.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
I can see a problem with the lack of wheelchair space in the 5 car units. Yes, I know they will get a free first class upgrade but that`ll be where problems start surely. On this basis anyone travelling who has a disabled railcard can get a free upgrade. Discrimination surely. Only wheelchair users can do this is not an answer. I wonder if GWR are setting themselves up here.
 

aar0

Member
Joined
13 Sep 2016
Messages
449
I have a vague idea of making an article for my university's newspaper about the train, do you think DfT/GWR/NR/Hitachi would be willing to let me on one next time it's in Swansea?

The ball would be entirely in the court of Hitachi - as has been said many times GWR have nothing to do with these units at the present time. Contact them by all means, but I wouldn't hold your hopes up - I believe the most recent visits to Maliphant are purely to commission the new Depot, testing is being done elsewhere and thus I'd suspect visits to be few and far between.

Emailed GWR, their response was nearly a whole sentence long - No.

I'll try and see one of the first into Swansea; I do have a photographer to come with me too.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,472
I can see a problem with the lack of wheelchair space in the 5 car units. Yes, I know they will get a free first class upgrade but that`ll be where problems start surely. On this basis anyone travelling who has a disabled railcard can get a free upgrade. Discrimination surely. Only wheelchair users can do this is not an answer. I wonder if GWR are setting themselves up here.

GWR aren’t setting themselves up for anything. For the umpteenth time the Interior specification is per the DfT.

Any concerns you have regarding the provision of standard class wheelchair accommodation should be addressed to:

The Rt Hon C Grayling MP
Department for Transport
Great Minster House
33 Horseferry Road
London
SW1P 4DR

There isn’t anything GWR can do about it. They are obliged to carry wheelchairs; they can only carry wheelchairs in 1st Class. Any “discrimination” claim (which incidentally I don’t think this is) goes down to the Civil Servants that specified no wheelchair space in standard.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,472
Emailed GWR, their response was nearly a whole sentence long - No.

I'll try and see one of the first into Swansea; I do have a photographer to come with me too.

Sorry to hear you were unsuccessful, although per my previous message - It’s Hitachi you need to be speaking to for access to Maliphant Depot, not GWR.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
GWR aren’t setting themselves up for anything. For the umpteenth time the Interior specification is per the DfT.

Any concerns you have regarding the provision of standard class wheelchair accommodation should be addressed to:

The Rt Hon C Grayling MP
Department for Transport
Great Minster House
33 Horseferry Road
London
SW1P 4DR

There isn’t anything GWR can do about it. They are obliged to carry wheelchairs; they can only carry wheelchairs in 1st Class. Any “discrimination” claim (which incidentally I don’t think this is) goes down to the Civil Servants that specified no wheelchair space in standard.

OK it isn`t GWR`s fault but this still answers nothing.
 

Olaf

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2014
Messages
1,054
Location
UK
I'm sure the ORR will have been alerted by Hitachi to any potential issues.

Unlikely, because this is a developing story - the range of customers affected was still growing and the investigation is not yet complete.
 

Olaf

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2014
Messages
1,054
Location
UK
Of course, test running can never truly replicate the effects of daily operation, but I haven't seen any suggestion so far that IEPs or any of the bullet trains supplied to Japanese railways have given cause for concern - I would have thought 300kmh+ running on Shinkansen routes would have found out flaws at an early stage.

Bullet trains were reported as affected by the issue earlier on the day I posted the above.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,329
Location
Epsom
I am currently on the 07.00 from Paddington and the interior is very good. Full report later. It's 008 and 009 by the way.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,253
OK it isn`t GWR`s fault but this still answers nothing.

As opposed to you raising what looks like a rather spurious 'concern'.

Wheelchair spaces are provided for people who need to use wheelchairs... many people with a Disabled Person's Railcard do not use wheelchairs and can perfectly happily sit in standard class (or first if they have bought a first class ticket).

Bullet trains were reported as affected by the issue earlier on the day I posted the above.

"Affected" in what way? In the same way as 800s and 802s, in that some of the material used may potentially have come from dubious batches of metal? Are there lots of bullet trains currently parked in sidings with fractured wheels or something?

Unlikely, because this is a developing story - the range of customers affected was still growing and the investigation is not yet complete.

It's not usually a good idea to let safety authorities in any industry find out about potential problems through the media... especially when you know they are on the brink of signing off your product for use by the public.
 

Oxfordblues

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
868
Oh dear, 1A03 appears have encountered further delay at Taplow. 42 late at Slough. This is after a 25min late start from Temple Meads.
 
Last edited:

Quark999

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2016
Messages
15
Plus the videos of seats roped off because the air con was leaking. They were floods - probably the first time anyone bothered testing the train with “super crush load” and the AC is going nuts because of all the extra warm bodies.

Going swimmingly, quite literally.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
24,737
Location
LBK
Plus the videos of seats roped off because the air con was leaking. They were floods - probably the first time anyone bothered testing the train with “super crush load” and the AC is going nuts because of all the extra warm bodies.

Going swimmingly, quite literally.

Nothing to do with a crush load - Coach D at least was locked out of use because of leaking air conditioning from Bristol. The problem was present as the train came off the depot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top