Are all trains supposed to have a trolley? Travelled from Newport to Paddington at 1140 on Sunday and didn't see a trolley at all.I would contend that having one trolley to serve 600+ passengers would be inadequate anyway.
Are all trains supposed to have a trolley? Travelled from Newport to Paddington at 1140 on Sunday and didn't see a trolley at all.I would contend that having one trolley to serve 600+ passengers would be inadequate anyway.
Are all trains supposed to have a trolley? Travelled from Newport to Paddington at 1140 on Sunday and didn't see a trolley at all.
Is that actually true, that the 9 car 802`s will virtually never see use west of Plymouth and can you provide confirmation of this.
The one time I travelled on an 800 though, the PIS was wrong, the service was being terminated early at Bristol due to lack of staff but the announcements about its original destination kept coming. They were not manually corrected. I imagine a few people may have been in for a shock when they reached Bristol.
This is what I feel so strongly about, particularly on behalf of disabled people. Even "invisible" disabilities such as chronic fatigue can make travelling hugely difficult, and having to face sudden upheaval without warning can be extremely traumatic for disabled passengers. I was so grateful for the opportunity to meet with GWR's disabled-access chap and talk about all this. Luckily he's on our side.
That is very interesting, the info made available so far on here is that the class 800 software was modified so that the full 940hp was available in the lower speed ranges so it was possible to maintain HST schedules on the reduced electrified network. I don't therefore understand why there should be any difference between the 800 and 802 on acceleration from the start.In the very limited 802 runs timed so far the superiority over 800 performance is readily apparent. At least 30-60s gained on each acceleration. Useful on any line with lots of stops and recovering from delays on the single line. Cotswolds perhaps?! We'll soon see when the 802s make an appearance there.
A friend of mine on the same train mentioned an announcement was made at Bodmin Parkway advising passengers intending to alight at Liskeard to move to the front set, which may have caused a delay.Not sure what happened on the restart from Par or indeed Bodmin on the return. My notes say that the engine under my coach (B, 9 of 10) was re-started at Liskeard.
I think they must have to be more precise so the automatic door release works properly, but I was talking to a driver earlier this week who was saying how much easier the brakes were to handle compared to an HST, in fact he said that the IET was a lovely train to drive.Start stop times may not look impressive but this was mainly down to slow approaches along each platform. This will surely improve with practice. How precise do the stops have to be?
About 30 short formed IETs today. All due to train faults according to the GWR journey check website.
Advocates of the new trains will of course state that this is not due to any failings of the trains themselves but is due to various other factors.
They may well be correct in this, but nevertheless the average passenger observes many 5 car IETs on services previously run by full length HSTs, and simply states that the new trains are worse.
Hard seats an no buffet merely add to the general feeling that DMUs are a downgrade if compared to "proper trains"
No doubt Broadgage and others count the number of short forms on journey check every day, and then post the same stuff on here irrespective of the replies.They are not all faults tough, 2 are away on training work and they are currently one HST to IET short. 1 is in for minor mods. 4 down.
That depends how close together the stations are! For example, an HST can do Bristol Parkway to Swindon in around 22 minutes. A diesel IET has no chance of doing that. Fortunately that section will soon be electrified.Are station-to-station journeys slower?
Surely it stopped at Cwmbran to pick up the crew? That's a much shorter car journey, mainly along a fast road.I was on 1P12 the 05:28 Hereford to Paddington this morning, between Oxford & Reading. Booked for a 9 car 800 but it was only 5 vice 9 today (800012).
ECS was supposed to pick up TM & Catering Crew from Newport but somehow got routed direct to Hereford at Maindy Jn. TM & Crew had to chase it to Hereford in a Taxi!(Insert favourite ‘enter the clowns’ circus type music here
) hence the late start.
Very good effort to be RT by M-in-M!![]()
No doubt Broadgage and others count the number of short forms on journey check every day, and then post the same stuff on here irrespective of the replies.
About 30 short formed IETs today. All due to train faults according to the GWR journey check website.
Advocates of the new trains will of course state that this is not due to any failings of the trains themselves but is due to various other factors.
They may well be correct in this
I avoid daily or frequent posts simply repeating the number of short formations, anyone wanting to know this can look on journey check.
I do however post when the situation is worse than normal, or sometimes in reply to those who state that the new units are wonderful and that short formations are in fact fine.
I recall a lot of very expensive advertising that featured new and longer trains.
I have made several trips on the 17-30 from Paddington to Taunton. Each one has been half length and overcrowded with reservations not valid. I have now reverted to the 18-03, which is still a proper full length train with reservations.
No matter how good may be the reasons for short formations, very few ordinary customers consider new shorter trains to be an improvement.
Anyone know what HST reliability was like when they were first introduced rather than after forty years of institutional experience?
I know I'll upset the HST fan club but the facts are the facts. The LNER HSTs are operating at nearly double the reliability of those on the west interestingly enough.
This could well be because GWR these days is mostly a regional stopping service to Bristol, whereas LNER is still "proper" IC, so they do less stopping and starting which isn't great for them.
Anyone know what HST reliability was like when they were first introduced rather than after forty years of institutional experience?
Yup, a good point. Running smoothly at a relatively constant speed for longer periods of time does tend to be more favourable.
Interesting because the stopping all shacks York/London services are more often run by HSTs than 225s from personal experience.Yup, a good point. Running smoothly at a relatively constant speed for longer periods of time does tend to be more favourable.
Patchy to say the best.
Not really comparable though, HST failures generally resulted in a full length loco hauled set being substituted, rather than the half length trains that result from IET non availability.
I'm guessing if a 5 car looses 2 engines it's useless, but if a 9 car looses 2 it could limp along....Also, back in BR days you had more spare stock kicking around whereas in modern times you tend to sweat the assets more and have higher availability requirements.
I think some of the figures given to me were around the 85% mark back then vice 95-98% these days. I can only speak for my personal experience and region.
Anyway, we digress somewhat from the topic at hand. I will be interested to see how the 9-car reliability varies from the 5-car and whether there is any amount of redundancy which allows them to continue where as 5 car would have to be pulled.
About 30 short formed IETs today. All due to train faults according to the GWR journey check website.
Advocates of the new trains will of course state that this is not due to any failings of the trains themselves but is due to various other factors.
They may well be correct in this, but nevertheless the average passenger observes many 5 car IETs on services previously run by full length HSTs, and simply states that the new trains are worse.
Hard seats an no buffet merely add to the general feeling that DMUs are a downgrade if compared to "proper trains"
No, there were only 8 short formed IET formations today! This affected approx 40 odd services.
There were 3x 5 vice 9 and 5x 5 vice 10 formations.
Just taking into consideration the 9 car formations mentioned above, if you had your much vaunted fixed rake formations, you would be unable to split them to provide cover for the three 9 car diagrams uncovered therefore you would be looking at least 15 services cancelled.
If all the 5 vice 10 formations mentioned were fixed 10 car and were unavailable for traffic there’s a further 29 services cancelled!
So yes I would say pretty good for fleet flexibility and whilst not good for the passenger travelling on it, I would expect they, like me this morning, would rather have the 5 car vice 9 that turned up for my train into work then no train at all!
Why do you post on here, though? Surely if you have a complaint or are unhappy with the service you have received you should contact GWR directly, who may be able to offer you compensation. I post on here in the hope that I might learn something of what is actually happening rather than what GWR tell me, but you do not seem to accept any of the replies you have received.I avoid daily or frequent posts simply repeating the number of short formations, anyone wanting to know this can look on journey check.
I do however post when the situation is worse than normal, or sometimes in reply to those who state that the new units are wonderful and that short formations are in fact fine.
Which for the most part has been delivered.I recall a lot of very expensive advertising that featured new and longer trains.
Why, if travelling from London to Taunton, would you opt to travel on a train taking an hour and a quarter longer than one that left half an hour behind it, and that is ignoring the perceived overcrowding? That doesn't sound like an "ordinary customer".I have made several trips on the 17-30 from Paddington to Taunton. Each one has been half length and overcrowded with reservations not valid. I have now reverted to the 18-03, which is still a proper full length train with reservations.
No matter how good may be the reasons for short formations, very few ordinary customers consider new shorter trains to be an improvement.
Don’t be silly - if they were all fixed formations we’d be phoning you asking for a spare Turbo to work an Oxford... They’d never cancel a precious Bristol or Swansea train!