• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How does data get to small railway stations for departure boards?

Trains1

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2024
Messages
120
Location
manchester
Hello

Does anyone on here know how the data for a small train stations run by Northern departure boards get there like over the Internet or is there a separate network for these it looks like thay connect back to the box that the ticket machine connects to

Thanks
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,269
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Over the Internet, likely via a SIM card.

The display on Northern's TVMs and information screens (rather than the LED ones) is just a web page eg:


Change the 3 letter code to the Northern operated station of your choice.
 

Mcq

Member
Joined
24 May 2019
Messages
394
Over the Internet, likely via a SIM card.

The display on Northern's TVMs and information screens (rather than the LED ones) is just a web page eg:


Change the 3 letter code to the Northern operated station of your choice.
Is there a similar Webcis for north london stations - e.g. Winchmore Hill (WIH) please?
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
2,774
Location
Nottingham
Last edited:

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,832
Location
Greater Manchester
Over the Internet, likely via a SIM card.

The display on Northern's TVMs and information screens (rather than the LED ones) is just a web page eg:

Web CIS
Change the 3 letter code to the Northern operated station of your choice.
That explains where the UI for the TVMs comes from, it's literally just that page!
I thought it was just something the TVM maker had designed.
 

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
1,726
Location
Horsley
Tiger only includes stations that have a Worldline CIS setup.
Crayford does have a Worldline CIS and has done for twelve years. For some odd reason most Southeastern stations are missing from the Tiger website. It is supposed to include all stations with a Worldline CIS but yet the majority of the Southeastern stations are missing. It must be an error and perhaps Worldline forgot to add them.
 

buz33

Member
Joined
21 Nov 2009
Messages
24
I had heard that particularly rural stations are sometimes well-placed to make use of RFC 1149 where connectivity is otherwise a challenge, though I understand the latency isn't great.
Explains all the Darwin "no reports".
I’d have thought that’d be more to do with the signalling design, rather than mobile/internet reception, particularly for stations that are in the middle of long block sections where there aren’t any track sensors.
I don't think that was a serious suggestion that RFC 1149 is used for internet connectivity.
 

Trains1

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2024
Messages
120
Location
manchester
There's a national data feed from Network Rail that anyone can subscribe to over the interweb. My teenage son has live departures from Nottingham Station continuously scrolling on a mini-LCD display hooked up to a Raspberry Pi.

EDIT: This is the link he used. Don't ask me for the details as I have no idea how it works

Also:
I'm building one of those at the moment
 

Frontera2

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2007
Messages
236
Crayford does have a Worldline CIS and has done for twelve years. For some odd reason most Southeastern stations are missing from the Tiger website. It is supposed to include all stations with a Worldline CIS but yet the majority of the Southeastern stations are missing. It must be an error and perhaps Worldline forgot to add them.
Not an error… there’s a cost element to providing TIGER feeds for more stations.
 

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
1,726
Location
Horsley
Not an error… there’s a cost element to providing TIGER feeds for more stations.
I am surprised that a state owned railway company as large as Southeastern can not afford that. At neighbouring GTR they have 100% of stations on Tiger despite having double the amount of stations. It is probably just someone at Southeastern management trying to cut costs by limiting Tiger to only a few stations.

I will say that Southeastern seems to spend a lot less money on their CIS compared to other TOCs. For example Southeastern still have 45 smaller stations (eg, Crowhurst, Folkestone West, Martin Mill, Stonegate, etc) that use basic Text To Speech (Acapela Rachel) announcements from the Infotec boards rather than proper Anne and Rob announcements. Meanwhile at neighbouring GTR they have proper Anne and Matt announcements at 100% of stations. Even tiny little Doleham has Anne announcements now.

It would be good if the ongoing nationalisation of all our TOCs brings some standardisation and brings all TOCs up to the same level. Hopefully all stations will be on Tiger then. Or maybe even a new replacement for Tiger will be developed by then.
 

rf_ioliver

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
923
I had heard that particularly rural stations are sometimes well-placed to make use of RFC 1149 where connectivity is otherwise a challenge, though I understand the latency isn't great.
And in many places they put lines up above the tracks so that the Layer 1s can take a rest.

RFC 1149 works best with UDP
 

Top