So, I asked WolframAlpha for some help here. Apparently that is a whopping 0.614mpg!an HST uses about 4.6 L of diesel fuel per km. That's 7.4 L per mile
So, I asked WolframAlpha for some help here. Apparently that is a whopping 0.614mpg!an HST uses about 4.6 L of diesel fuel per km. That's 7.4 L per mile
Eh? I think you are a factor 2 too high. In post https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/how-much-does-it-cost-to-power-a-train.156878/#post-3660722 43096 stated that an HST set, not power car, cost £4.32 per mile. Rounding the figures to £4.50 per mile over 400 miles this comes to £1,800 which means eleven passengers buying Standard Anytime tickets would pay the fuel bill.If a mile cost £9 in fuel then a 393 mile run from Kings Cross to Edinburgh (non-stop) would cost approx £3550 (£3537 on a calculator) on a HST
Are there differences in track access charges for a DMU vs the EMU, (lets say for a Class 221 vs a Class 390 on the WCML.) probably/maybe because of weight? Are there any "eco" charges between them? (I'm thinking of some sort of penalty charge for using a DMU where an EMU could be used?)
Would there be any other costs to be factored between running a DMU or an EMU in this example? (A DMU degrading the quality of overhead lines prematurely due to pollution??)
To flip the question another way, does an operator get any bonus/incentive for using an EMU where they could use a DMU on the same route?
Thanks for any info!