On some busy routes the headcode may even be duplicated on the same day: If you run 3tph for 18 hours a day, you need 54 headcodes in each direction First "up" train might be 2A01, then 2A03, 2A05 etc, to 2A99, then starts again at 2A01.Only unique within a limited area. In the case of headcodes, these can even be duplicated within one TOC, eg SWR has 2Rxx and 2Sxx services both in the Hounslow and Romsey areas. Signal box prefixes are also duplicated, eg W is used for both Wimbledon and Westbury.
Correct. When speaking to the signaller at LS1301 and LS1303 ground position lights, you must specify Stafford, for which additional notes are made on the signal. The other LS ground position lights are at Litchfield.You shouldnt have duplicate signal numbers on the same control area. I am fairly sure there are a couple that slipped through the net around Stafford, will double check.
Thanks, knew I wasn't going senile.Correct. When speaking to the signaller at LS1301 and LS1303 ground position lights, you must specify Stafford, for which additional notes are made on the signal. The other LS ground position lights are at Litchfield.
I've heard of cases of two trains running at the same time on the same route. One began before midnight, the other afterwardsHeadcodes (officially train IDs) can be duplicated and often are around the country. But I believe the same headcode shouldn't run in the same region within 8-12 hours. This necessitates 9xxx headcodes at GTR, London Overground and TfL Rail / Crossrail as otherwise there would be too many potential conflicts.
Headcodes (officially train IDs) can be duplicated and often are around the country. But I believe the same headcode shouldn't run in the same region within 8-12 hours. This necessitates 9xxx headcodes at GTR, London Overground and TfL Rail / Crossrail as otherwise there would be too many potential conflicts.
The train describers in hardware panels have four-character displays which would need major modification to show more characters. Some of the older ones may still be based on early electronics which could only handle a four-character description, as may the protocols by which descriptions are transmitted.I had to explain UK headcodes to a bunch of German engineers a few years ago. They couldn't believe that we have a system in which you can have duplicates! They asked why we don't have a couple more digits. I guess that's because the headcode had to be fitted into the four boxes on the front of a diesel loco way back when, and be big enough for the signaller to read.
Headcodes (officially train IDs) can be duplicated and often are around the country. But I believe the same headcode shouldn't run in the same region within 8-12 hours. This necessitates 9xxx headcodes at GTR, London Overground and TfL Rail / Crossrail as otherwise there would be too many potential conflicts.
The UID is allocated by NR ops planning ....
Only unique within a limited area. In the case of headcodes, these can even be duplicated within one TOC, eg SWR has 2Rxx and 2Sxx services both in the Hounslow and Romsey areas. Signal box prefixes are also duplicated, eg W is used for both Wimbledon and Westbury.
You may want someone to check Crewe in Dec:You shouldnt have duplicate signal numbers on the same control area. I am fairly sure there are a couple that slipped through the net around Stafford, will double check.
I had to explain UK headcodes to a bunch of German engineers a few years ago. They couldn't believe that we have a system in which you can have duplicates! They asked why we don't have a couple more digits. I guess that's because the headcode had to be fitted into the four boxes on the front of a diesel loco way back when, and be big enough for the signaller to read.
I was on about signal numbers, we all know headcodes slip through the cracks. I expect someone has spotted those.You may want someone to check Crewe in Dec:
1K02 arrives from Llandudno Jn at 05:59
1K02 depart Crewe for Derby at 06:58
TfW and EMR appear to be all over each other in the 1Kxx series. 1K07 are less than an hour apart.
Yes, plated 'Trent Valley LS' and 'Stafford LS'.You shouldnt have duplicate signal numbers on the same control area. I am fairly sure there are a couple that slipped through the net around Stafford, will double check.
Daft question, but why weren’t one set either re-lettered or, say, 4000 not added to the signal numbers?Yes, plated 'Trent Valley LS' and 'Stafford LS'.
Re-lettering would go against the geographical area, number change would make sense but would be pretty expensive to resolve for what are not main aspects.Daft question, but why weren’t one set either re-lettered or, say, 4000 not added to the signal numbers?
Thameslink use 9O - St Albans to Sutton / Sutton to St Albans via WimbledonAt St Pancras, a 1Fxx is either a Southeastern service to or from Faversham or an EMR service to Sheffield, because HS1 and the MML are separate regions with seperate signalling control. Eg, on a weekday the 1131 departure to Sheffield is 1F27, then the 1140 arrival from Faversham is 1F27.
The Thameslink and Eurostar services all use 9xxx, but I don't think they share letter codes, as services to Paris are 9Oxx and those to/via Brussels 9Ixx, letters I think that are usually avoided
The UID is allocated within Network Rail's Train Planning System, and has to be unique on any one day. It is exported on the CIF timetable data files and Darwin is one of the downstream systems that makes use of it.Thought this was a Darwin generated identifier, hence associated with a TOC. Although they call it a RID by adding date onto it so making it unique for 24 hours.
Is a while since had to understand these (headcodes and UID's) so may not be exact.
9 headcodes are one of those railway oddities. Used to denote slow freight trains (uncoupled I think). When Eurostar came along 9 was adopted to fit in with the French train code system (9Oxx and 9Ixx UK become 90xx and 91xx respectively in France). Since then 9 headcodes became used for a wider variety of services including those that don't take the 'traditional' or direct route hence Euston - Scotland via West Midlands (rather than Trent Valley) and Liverpool - Edinburgh via ECML (rather than WCML) trains carry these.I believe 9 headcodes are used to denote trains with special signalling requirements. 9 headcodes are used at SWR when a 442 is running to denote to the signaller the train has limited route availability, while 9s on GTR / LO are used to denote trains that are cleared into the relevant core sections, to limit the possibility of a train being wrong-routed.
We have the first train as 2F01, but by 2200 we are back to 2F01 once more, there are also S-ARS issues with the same train, when a train is platformed overnight, if you enter the headcode anytime before about 0400, even if the train has run the previous day, it will see it as 'late' and set a routeTPE has 2 1M91
06:13 EDB-MIA and
16:11 EDB-MIA
There is also a 1M91 16:09 Brighton-Victoria
Looking at Genius however the headcodes aren't 4 digits which probably helps identify them on modern computer and tracking systems, although we still use the 4 digits as standard