Stephen Lee
On Moderation
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2019
- Messages
- 680
Or perhaps more likely DB saw an opportunity to reduce costs by contractually 'hitching a ride' with Nightjet, and Nightjet an opportunity to increase revenue with a contribution from DB?Recently, I have heard that the Amsterdam-Zurich Nightjet service is replacing an overnight ICE service, I wondered if Sleepers/Couchettes has become a compulsory element to form a night train?
No, but sleeper accommodation - and I believe air-conditioned sleeper accommodation at that - is compulsory to use the EuroNight designation. The Berlin-Stockholm service is a mere "Durchzug", as is the Vienna-Kiev one.Recently, I have heard that the Amsterdam-Zurich Nightjet service is replacing an overnight ICE service, I wondered if Sleepers/Couchettes has become a compulsory element to form a night train?
Although it's one train, the seated carriages run as IC 60403 and the sleeper/couchette cars as NJ 403 (train numbers towards Zürich). It thus depends on which train number you book a ticket for what the fare will be: book IC 60403 and you'll pay normal DB fares, but when NJ 403 is booked you'll pay the Nightjet fares.I do wonder what seated the ticketing arrangements are e.g. for a domestic journey in Germany pay fare to DB and travel in their (or SBB) coaches, and for international journey pay fare to Nightjet and travel in their coaches. Maybe someone can advise how it works.
The sleeper wouldn't have been viable on its own, and the night ICE was an expensive way to provide for the various markets it covered.Or perhaps more likely DB saw an opportunity to reduce costs by contractually 'hitching a ride' with Nightjet, and Nightjet an opportunity to increase revenue with a contribution from DB?
Although it's one train, the seated carriages run as IC 60403 and the sleeper/couchette cars as NJ 403 (train numbers towards Zürich). It thus depends on which train number you book a ticket for what the fare will be: book IC 60403 and you'll pay normal DB fares, but when NJ 403 is booked you'll pay the Nightjet fares.
The DB journey planner actually gives you four options for this journey: by Nightjet to Basel and then a domestic Swiss IC (probably faster due to shunting in Basel), by IC direct to Zürich. The other to options are possible due to the IC/NJ being so slow: domestic IC to Arnhem (departing 10 minutes later, but overtaking the NJ in Maarn), then continue as above.
The direct IC from Amsterdam to Zürich however is the only connection where DB is able to show a fare.
The sleeper wouldn't have been viable on its own, and the night ICE was an expensive way to provide for the various markets it covered.
Any other examples?Although many of DB's overnight IC/ICE services could be replaced by seating coaches attached to Nightjets, not all of them can - one example that can't is the overnight service between Wien Hbf and Rostock Hbf, which serves pretty much just as a way of cycling DB's Stadler Kiss units between the Dresden - Warnemunde route and their maintenance base with Westbahn in Vienna.
Looks like there’s a surplus of IC1 coaches due to more IC2, ICE-4 and ICE-L deliveredAlthough many of DB's overnight IC/ICE services could be replaced by seating coaches attached to Nightjets, not all of them can - one example that can't is the overnight service between Wien Hbf and Rostock Hbf, which serves pretty much just as a way of cycling DB's Stadler Kiss units between the Dresden - Warnemunde route and their maintenance base with Westbahn in Vienna.
Not that instantly come to mind but it wouldn’t surprise me if there were others, especially on routes to/from Hamburg as that’s where the ICE1, ICE2 and ICE4 fleets are all maintained.Any other examples?
DB are trying to eliminate the IC1 coaches and the 101s from their fleet, so I can’t see DB wanting to deploy them on any new services.Looks like there’s a surplus of IC1 coaches due to more IC2, ICE-4 and ICE-L delivered
It's Durchgangszug.No, but sleeper accommodation - and I believe air-conditioned sleeper accommodation at that - is compulsory to use the EuroNight designation. The Berlin-Stockholm service is a mere "Durchzug", as is the Vienna-Kiev one.
It's Durchgangszug.
As far as I can see, it is NJ 325 throughout.EuroNight is still used extensively for international services and ICN for domestic Italian services, but all the ÖBB operated services are Nightjet. I believe that the Brussels-Vienna service, which attaches to Amsterdam-Wien/Innsbruck one at Köln West (or in my case, Troisdorf, due to engineering works) is EN325 before it gets to Aachen.
It's NJ 425 on the Nightjet website, although it travels with NJ 421 to Nuremberg and NJ 491 after that.As far as I can see, it is NJ 325 throughout.
Bahn.de and Hafas said NJ 325 for the Brussels to Vienna portionIt's NJ 425 on the Nightjet website, although it travels with NJ 421 to Nuremberg and NJ 491 after that.
Bahn.de and Hafas said NJ 325 for the Brussels to Vienna portion
As it happens, the three daily overnight seats trains all run to/from Hamburg:Not that instantly come to mind but it wouldn’t surprise me if there were others, especially on routes to/from Hamburg as that’s where the ICE1, ICE2 and ICE4 fleets are all maintained.
The Brussels Nightjet has a 3xx-number in Belgium as the number range 400-450 is already in use for the NMBS-IC from Welkenraedt to Kortrijk. (Although there's no actual train numbered 425)ÖBB timetable site says 425. It’s possible both are right - 325 for operational (from Brussels to Köln, allocated by SNCB and DB) and 425 for commercial purposes (allocated by ÖBB).