• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is it unreasonable for retailers or TOCs such as XC to charge for collecting tickets from machines?

Status
Not open for further replies.

156421

On Moderation
Joined
23 Aug 2022
Messages
298
Location
Weſtmorland 'n' Furneß
Mod Note: Posts #1 - #5 originally in this thread.

Well, you were ripped off when you booked in tghe first place, because Trainline charge a booking fee, something none of the TOCs do.

Follow Barry Doe's advice (RAIL magazine) and don't use Trainline.
I recall that XC does charge a fee of £1 if you want to print your tickets at a TVM. I really hope other TOCs don't follow suit.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,892
Location
Yorkshire
I recall that XC does charge a fee of £1 if you want to print your tickets at a TVM. I really hope other TOCs don't follow suit.
This charge is only applicable where alternatives exist; to be honest it is not unreasonable for passengers who choose to shun e-tickets to bear some of the cost, but £1 is more than the bill XC recieve from the TVM operator, so it's too much.

The forum's site doesn't charge such a fee; it just reduces the margins (in some cases resulting in a loss for the retailer).
 

156421

On Moderation
Joined
23 Aug 2022
Messages
298
Location
Weſtmorland 'n' Furneß
This charge is only applicable where alternatives exist; to be honest it is not unreasonable for passengers who choose to shun e-tickets to bear some of the cost, but £1 is more than the bill XC recieve from the TVM operator, so it's too much.

The forum's site doesn't charge such a fee; it just reduces the margins (in some cases resulting in a loss for the retailer).
Alternative point of view... it's not unreasonable for a passenger to expect a TOC to provide a paper ticket at no extra cost.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,269
Location
No longer here
Alternative point of view... it's not unreasonable for a passenger to expect a TOC to provide a paper ticket at no extra cost.
It's not an unreasonable request but also not unreasonable for them to say "actually no we will not foot the cost for printing your ticket on a dead tree from a giant machine which is plugged in 24/365".
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,954
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Alternative point of view... it's not unreasonable for a passenger to expect a TOC to provide a paper ticket at no extra cost.

Why isn't it reasonable for a customer to be charged less for a means of delivery that is cheaper to the vendor? That happens all the time. For instance, if I order an item to collect from a store I'm normally not charged a fee, but if I order it for delivery I'm charged the cost of the delivery.

The base option is the lowest-cost one, an e-ticket. You pay more if you want them to print the e-ticket for you, and more still if you want them to do that AND post it to you.

Seems fair to me.
 

Doctor Fegg

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
1,843
It's not an unreasonable request but also not unreasonable for them to say "actually no we will not foot the cost for printing your ticket on a dead tree from a giant machine which is plugged in 24/365".
In the round of the railway's overall budget, it absolutely is. Given that the TVM exists and is internet-connected already - unless you're proposing abolishing TVMs, which would be an interesting position to take - what's the marginal cost of printing a ticket? 2p?

Why isn't it reasonable for a customer to be charged less for a means of delivery that is cheaper to the vendor? That happens all the time. For instance, if I order an item to collect from a store I'm normally not charged a fee, but if I order it for delivery I'm charged the cost of the delivery.

The base option is the lowest-cost one, an e-ticket. You pay more if you want them to print the e-ticket for you, and more still if you want them to do that AND post it to you.
Of course, "they" don't print the ticket for you at a TVM, because "they" is XC Trains Ltd and they don't run any stations.
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,269
Location
No longer here
In the round of the railway's overall budget, it absolutely is. Given that the TVM exists and is internet-connected already - unless you're proposing abolishing TVMs, which would be an interesting position to take - what's the marginal cost of printing a ticket? 2p?
You'd need fewer inefficient and carbon-damaging TVMs if fewer people collected tickets from them. They're expensive to run - plugged in all day every day - and maintain. And the more printing it does, the quicker parts get life-expired and require replacement. Running 1500 TVMs instead of 700 really does make a difference, and given a S+B ticket machine costs something like £20,000 (an old figure from VTWC, ten years ago) for replacement it really does make a difference.

There are good reasons why even TOCs with TVMs want you to use e-tickets. Mostly, it's the actual cost of having a gigantic machine present to print something on a credit card sized piece of paper.
 

Peter0124

Established Member
Joined
20 Nov 2016
Messages
1,966
Location
Glasgow
Scotrail need to get with the times and start offering e-tickets. The app idea is stupid.
 

BigB

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
268
Location
Scotland
They have to pay the TOC a small sum for doing so.
Do you have a figure for this, just to see how reasonable the £1 surcharge is?
Of course reverse psychology would work well here, if sites offered a "discount" of £1 if taking an e-ticket!
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
1,774
Location
Warks
Do you have a figure for this, just to see how reasonable the £1 surcharge is?
Of course reverse psychology would work well here, if sites offered a "discount" of £1 if taking an e-ticket!
(a) • A variable fee rate of 0.50% shall be due on all ToD fulfilment transactions (CTR) with a value at or above £15. • For CTR values of less than £15, a fixed minimum fee of 7.5p per CTR shall be due. • For CTR values at or above £100, a fixed maximum fee of 50p per CTR shall be due.

There are, of course, other fixed costs to bear in mind to be able to insert CTRs in the first place as well as ongoing support costs to deal with print failures etc.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,286
given a S+B ticket machine costs something like £20,000
And that's just the up-front cost. On top of that will be an assortment of fixed charges from the supplier for keeping the things up to date, costs of linking to various data sources, software costs and staffing.
 

BigB

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
268
Location
Scotland
(a) • A variable fee rate of 0.50% shall be due on all ToD fulfilment transactions (CTR) with a value at or above £15. • For CTR values of less than £15, a fixed minimum fee of 7.5p per CTR shall be due. • For CTR values at or above £100, a fixed maximum fee of 50p per CTR shall be due.

There are, of course, other fixed costs to bear in mind to be able to insert CTRs in the first place as well as ongoing support costs to deal with print failures etc.
Thanks - for most transactions I buy then the £1 charge would be reasonable if an e-ticket option was available.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
16,132
Location
0036
As far as I know, Lumo won't offer ToD as an option at all where e-tickets are available. Neither will LNER on their app, and on their website you have to click "I don't have a phone or printer" to get ToD.

I think it's not unreasonable for TOCs that don't have any TVMs to charge a very moderate fee for ToD when an e-ticket is available. For those that do have TVMs the fees probably cancel out.
 

crablab

Member
Joined
8 Feb 2020
Messages
772
Location
UK
What is unreasonable is charging for ToD on cross-London tickets. It's not like the passenger has any choice...

I note that the Trainline corporate platform charges an amount for an eTicket (!!) but more for ToD. That does not reduce if ToD is the only option...
 

Wallsendmag

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2014
Messages
5,214
Location
Wallsend or somewhere in GB
What is unreasonable is charging for ToD on cross-London tickets. It's not like the passenger has any choice...

I note that the Trainline corporate platform charges an amount for an eTicket (!!) but more for ToD. That does not reduce if ToD is the only option...
There should always be a free fulfilment option
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
1,749
Location
Hampshire
OK. Let's charge extra for buying tickets at a ticket office!
Conversely, I do rather like the idea of a small discount for using etickets.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,286
What is unreasonable is charging for ToD on cross-London tickets. It's not like the passenger has any choice..
Who does this? (see below)

There is not on the corporate platform I use. Both eTicket and ToD are chargeable.

This may well be part of the contract for the platform - no idea.
Corporate platforms are subject to specific contracts and can, essentially, do what they like.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,496
Location
Sheffield
There are good reasons why even TOCs with TVMs want you to use e-tickets. Mostly, it's the actual cost of having a gigantic machine present to print something on a credit card sized piece of paper.

Why are the TVMs so big and seemingly getting ever bigger (if the latest Northern & TPE machines are anything to go by) ?
 

Parjon

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2022
Messages
519
Location
St Helens
London NorthWestern. I was very surprised to be offered a choice recently between a "free" e-ticket or £1 to collect from a machine.

As it was a walk up ticket I just bought from the station. For "free".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top