TT-ONR-NRN
Veteran Member
This all does seem to be rather far-fetched. Realistically, calling all TfW services at Llanfairpwll except perhaps the three "Intercity" services per day would be a good idea though.
Road closures often apply unnecessarily to cyclists, so this might not mean anything.Initially the bridge was closed to all traffic. Now it is open to pedistrians, but only in limited numbers. Cyclists must dismount and walk accross on the pedestrian footpath. That a mere bicycle is banned from the road deck is very concerning.
Road closures often apply unnecessarily to cyclists, so this might not mean anything.
My understanding is the engineers are concerned about the vibrations caused by cycling on the road deck.
Realistically, calling all TfW services at Llanfairpwll except perhaps the three "Intercity" services per day would be a good idea though.
Or is it felt there are enough supports for it to stay up even if one or two fail, they just don't want them shaken loose and landing on anyone's head?
Of the trains just listed, the 1848 down might be of some use, but would slightly delay the 1926 up. The others aren't at busy times.
If there is overcrowding in the peaks, the first step might be to look at reworking the stock diagrams.
The problem is the queues over the bridge, so getting a shuttle bus isn't going to make those go away.This is a crisis situation. People could be "encouraged" to take shuttle buses on to the Mainland.
Seriously? Is the bus meant to stop at every car or would they just walk up the live lane?They could leave their vehicles in the first lane of the dual carriageway, plenty of space there.
Experts keeping an eye on it is why it has been closed. Otherwise the first we'd have known about the problem would have been a car ending up in the Menai Straight. Regular renewals have taken place, but AIUI only hangers showing signs of wear have been replaced, with many still the original or at least very old fittings.One would have thought that experts were keeping an eye on the bridge, much renewal work must have been done on it in the past. Or perhaps not, is it in near-original condition?
So people with pets, children, luggage, disabilites etc, would be required to get out of their cars with a live lane of HGVs next to them? Not a chance the police would sanction it.Yes, seriously! A bus could replace 50 cars, that would 'speed up' traffic a lot and reduce queues. Cars could park in the first lane leaving room to walk by on the nearside. Buses, essential delivery vehicles etc could use the fast lane (max 20 mph).
Strong action is needed, but this is not the solution.I remember queues there many years ago. A situation could arise where food stores on Ynys Mon could not get deliveries, and where ambulances get stuck. I think strong action is needed.
The bridge is inspected every two years with a very thorough inspection every six. The 2019 inspection noted several issues. A plan was agreed that included additional frequent inspections.One would have thought that experts were keeping an eye on the bridge, much renewal work must have been done on it in the past. Or perhaps not, is it in near-original condition?
It would be a lot safer to set up a contraflow and use one carriageway a la M20 Operation Stack. But you've also got traffic from Beaumaris and Amlwch and a bit from the South converging on the junction for which this idea doesn't work.So people with pets, children, luggage, disabilites etc, would be required to get out of their cars with a live lane of HGVs next to them? Not a chance the police would sanction it.
2pm Friday is probably a peak eastbound time. But it does make sense to encourage commuters onto rail - how about temporary reduced fares?How much of the problem at the time of your photo is linked road freight including that heading to/from Ireland for specific ferries every 6 hours or so, tradespeople and others starting and ending their journey nowhere near a railway station?
There’s been talk in the past of a third ‘tidal flow’ lane (which the Britannia bridge is wide enough to support), never taken forward generally because of safety concerns in general use. Does anyone know if that’s been considered for this crisis?
Yes, it is getting serious consideration.
I have concerns for safety of cyclists if this goes ahead. The A55 is open to bicycles between Llanfairpwll and Bangor.
I'll probably be cycling over the Britania bridge on the 7th and 9th due to the industrial action at Network Rail.
The merging back down to the original lanes would take away any benefits from an extra lane if it's only a 'tidal flow' lane.There’s been talk in the past of a third ‘tidal flow’ lane (which the Britannia bridge is wide enough to support), never taken forward generally because of safety concerns in general use. Does anyone know if that’s been considered for this crisis?
With strict 30 mph speed limits and visible traffic police presence the safety risks would be much lower than a permanent third lane; the tidal lane would be open only in the bridge peaks, managed with cones like the Mersey Tunnels police do on the Wallasey tunnel each day (and let’s remember the A55 teams have probably more experience than anywhere in the use of cones!).
As a very regular user of both bridges I know congestion can occur both ways simultaneously, but there are obvious peaks (mornings off the island, evenings onto the island, certain ferries from Holyhead, Sunday flows off the island which will reduce after half term fortunately) that a temporary, highly supervised third lane would give a real mitigation to.
It looks like the width exists to keep 2 lanes on one side all the way through the single carriageway section, so it would be of considerable benefit to the side that gets the extra lane if it eliminates the bottleneck completely. However the off-peak traffic will need to drop low enough in both directions to allow the lane to be switched without causing massive tailbacks. It might also need some reconstruction of the road surface at the gore for the central reservation at each end, which would probably kill the idea as an emergency solution.The merging back down to the original lanes would take away any benefits from an extra lane if it's only a 'tidal flow' lane.
It's an A road not a motorway.Must admit I didn't know it was open to cyclists. I wonder how many others don't?
Why? the road either side is a 4-lane dual carriageway (not to mention that some traffic will peel off at the junctions each end).The merging back down to the original lanes would take away any benefits from an extra lane if it's only a 'tidal flow' lane.
Not all A roads are open to Cyclists - Certain stretches are classed as 'Special Roads' and have prohibitions in force. These are usually tunnels but I think there are some open roads that function as quasi-motorways. Southwick Hill tunnel on the A27 is one example: https://www.google.com/maps/@50.845...4!1sTJZBlNOAIoc8WBCy0XqCjA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192., also the A55 itself at Penmaenmawr Tunnels https://www.google.com/maps/@53.266...4!1sQg5xAgbbUQiAGC0RzvLAfw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192It's an A road not a motorway.
Fair point.Not all A roads are open to Cyclists - Certain stretches are classed as 'Special Roads' and have prohibitions in force. These are usually tunnels but I think there are some open roads that function as quasi-motorways. Southwick Hill tunnel on the A27 is one example: https://www.google.com/maps/@50.845...4!1sTJZBlNOAIoc8WBCy0XqCjA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192., also the A55 itself at Penmaenmawr Tunnels https://www.google.com/maps/@53.266...4!1sQg5xAgbbUQiAGC0RzvLAfw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Extra subsidy on a temporary basis for bus and train tickets between Bangor and Anglesey is about the only thing that could be done. If the Welsh Government wanted to pay for it of course. A temporary car park expansion would also be possible at Llanfairpwll, but it's doubtful how much difference that would make in practice.2pm Friday is probably a peak eastbound time. But it does make sense to encourage commuters onto rail - how about temporary reduced fares?
To take 175 cars off the road (each, on average, containing say 1.5 people) would require 260 seats - so 4cars?This is the first draft of what I will be sending to various politicians and employers. It is a simplification of what is possible but I want to keep this short.
A third Menai crossing will take seven years and cost £400 million. That will not help while the Menai Bridge is closed for repairs and takes money that could be spent elsewhere like the NHS. We need something that can be done quickly and at a low cost.
A rail shuttle service between Llanfairpwll and Bangor needs no new infrastructure and no planning permission. A shuttle train could run every 30 minutes, complementing the existing service. Every train would take 150 to 200 cars off the bridge.
Small changes to existing bus routes would connect the council park and rides at Gaerwen and Llanfairpwll to the station. Bangor University, Coleg Menai and St.Gerard’s are a short walk from Bangor station. The 5C bus connects Bangor Station to Ysbyty Gwynedd, Parc Menai and Caernarfon every 15 minutes. These destinations account for a large portion of the trips between Anglesey and the mainland.
Transport for Wales rail have new trains entering service in a few weeks. Two of the trains replaced by new ones could be used for the shuttle.
Every Holyhead train should call at Llanfairpwll as this would then act as a railhead for most of Anglesey rather people driving the ‘wrong way’ to Holyhead or having to cross either bridge to Bangor thereby adding to the congestion.The email I sent has slightly lower (but still optimistic) numbers of cars off the road.
TBH, the shuttle would likely get whatever cascades down to the bottom following the introduction of new trains. That might be a 153. Anything would be an improvment.
One limit is going to be parking. There isn't enough at Llafairpwll and I don't think the ~70 bays are meant to serve the station. There is a free car park nearby with about 50 bays. There are two park and rides that could feed in. Llanfairpwll is 72 + 5 disabled. Gaerwen is 114+7. The Llanfairpwll p&r sees some use already, but I've never seen a car parked at Gaerwen. There is bus service to the station but it might be hard to convince people to use it.
Most of the people using Llanfairpwll now either walk or have a car drop off and pick them up.
There is the possiblity of adding more parking, but that takes time and money.
Valley station would benfit from a real car park. There appears to be room for one, but it would need planning permission, time and money.
Most of the TfW trains do, other than the 3 "Intercity express" trains.Every Holyhead train should call at Llanfairpwll as this would then act as a railhead for most of Anglesey rather people driving the ‘wrong way’ to Holyhead or having to cross either bridge to Bangor thereby adding to the congestion.
The staff are trained for single door operation, although the wisdom of doing that at Llanfair would be questionable if it gets the usage required to justify a stop. If the driver stopped in the platform, yes it would block the level crossing although that could be solved by putting the stop board further up the track.I'm against having the Avanti Voyagers stop. There is at least one daily 10-car voyager. I could imagine passengers boarding at Bangor in the wrong half and ending up at Holyhead. Even with the 5 car, I can see people not getting to the door in reasonable time or missing it entirely. There possible operation issues that I know little or nothing about. Are staff trained for single door operation, will a 10 car Voyager block the level crossing?
Fair point.
In any case, a cyclist has an alternative - they could walk their bike across the Telford bridge without losing more than 2 min. (A dispensation could allow disabled cyclists to ride across - there aren't enough of them to cause the bridge to collapse).
To take 175 cars off the road (each, on average, containing say 1.5 people) would require 260 seats - so 4cars?
The Welsh Government is working closely with stakeholders and public transport operators to see what additional services can be implemented.