• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is this the most powerful train to run on the network? And what was it's purpose?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SteveyBee131

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
651
Location
Grimsby Town
I've seen various pictures and footage of these workings today:



With 2 HST power cars and 2 class 91s, which were all taking power, that makes 17,100 horsepower!

Not counting class 374 Eurostars (the newer ones) as they only run on HS1, or Eurotunnel trains, has anything more powerful ever run on the network?

I gather it might be some sort of test train, but what exactly was it's purpose?

I couldn't find anything about said train elsewhere on here, but if I've missed it feel free to redirect me :D
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
They would have needed multiple drivers if they were all powering - there wouldn't be any connection between the power cars, so two drivers there. As regards the 91s, at least one driver, and depends on whether they still have RCH jumpers which would allow them to send the TDM signal through the coach lighting control circuits (seem to recall reading that the RCH jumpers were removed from 91s at the last refurbishment?)
 

SteveyBee131

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
651
Location
Grimsby Town
They would have needed multiple drivers if they were all powering - there wouldn't be any connection between the power cars, so two drivers there. As regards the 91s, at least one driver, and depends on whether they still have RCH jumpers which would allow them to send the TDM signal through the coach lighting control circuits (seem to recall reading that the RCH jumpers were removed from 91s at the last refurbishment?)
I couldn't say for sure, but in the footage I've seen of it there was too much sound emanating from the relevant places for them to not all be taking power.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,302
They would have needed multiple drivers if they were all powering - there wouldn't be any connection between the power cars, so two drivers there. As regards the 91s, at least one driver, and depends on whether they still have RCH jumpers which would allow them to send the TDM signal through the coach lighting control circuits (seem to recall reading that the RCH jumpers were removed from 91s at the last refurbishment?)
Why would the two power cars have needed a driver in each? Could just run a 36-way jumper through the train.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Why would the two power cars have needed a driver in each? Could just run a 36-way jumper through the train.

I'd assumed they hadn't if it was a one off - I guess if there are any close up photos this would show one way or the other!
 

AlexNL

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
1,683
According to this tweet the 91s weren't taking power, they had their pans up for overhead line monitoring purposes:
Yes, HST power cars (class 43) are the motive power; the 91 (there’s one at each end) is pan up for Olé calibration/monitoring/recording purposes.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
Back when NR had a couple of 86s for OHLE testing weren’t they modified internally, into half a traction package and half load bank? When testing the OHLE it’s more to do with drawing controllable exact currents, rather than just whacking a high load on the system.

Are these 91s fully functional as locos still?
 

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
426
4 piddling locos? Amateurs (not in the UK though):
(Only 4 are actually driving, in order to test interop - the last 2 are providing a simulated load.)
 

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
426
That may look impressive, but those locos are barely over 2MW, so that train is "only" around 20MW (didn't count too exactly, but it seemed to be around 10 locos). Whereas that 6-loco european train has 6MW locomotives, or close to 36MW total. (So you can even get 4 loco trains that will outpower that american weakling train :p - size isn't everything after all: https://twitter.com/AtkosKhan/status/1228455317673062400/photo/1 )
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
The Americans laugh at Europe and it's wimpy trains

In the meantime, Europe laughs at America for its track condition, passenger services, and — *checks notes* — ah yes, everything else about the country.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,288
Location
Leeds
Play nice, everyone! I think we can all appreciate USRailFan's post as lighthearted as well as the impressive length of American freight trains.
 

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
That may look impressive, but those locos are barely over 2MW, so that train is "only" around 20MW (didn't count too exactly, but it seemed to be around 10 locos). Whereas that 6-loco european train has 6MW locomotives, or close to 36MW total. (So you can even get 4 loco trains that will outpower that american weakling train :p - size isn't everything after all: https://twitter.com/AtkosKhan/status/1228455317673062400/photo/1 )
What’s the power to weight ratio tho? (when you include the weight of the power station)
 

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
426
What’s the power to weight ratio tho? (when you include the weight of the power station)
Not sure, but you'll need to tell me how heavy the refinery and oil wells for the diesel train are :).

(The Swiss one is using hydro, so it's a bit hard to figure out what the right number is - just the turbine and generator, the pipework, the entire lake?).
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
That may look impressive, but those locos are barely over 2MW, so that train is "only" around 20MW (didn't count too exactly, but it seemed to be around 10 locos). Whereas that 6-loco european train has 6MW locomotives, or close to 36MW total. (So you can even get 4 loco trains that will outpower that american weakling train :p - size isn't everything after all: https://twitter.com/AtkosKhan/status/1228455317673062400/photo/1 )

Actually, all the (nine) locos on the American train are around 3 to 3.3 MW (4000 to 4400 hp) each - so if they were all running (which they're not, it would be far too much tractive effort on the front of a heavy train) they'd total about 30 MW.

Over 20 years ago GE and EMD did develop 6000 hp (4.5 MW) diesel locos but the railroads that bought them decided that 4400 hp per loco was sufficient for their needs, so AFAIK all of those built are now either scrapped or rebuilt/downgraded into 4400 hp units. I saw a 6000 hp GE AC6000CW loco hauling freight on the CSX railroad once - the meanest sounding vehicle on steel wheels I've ever heard :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top