Hi all,
I recently noticed that the page on the national rail website giving information on ticketing has had a paragraph removed. Previously on this page - https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/ticket_types.aspx#Routeing information - there was an extract that read "When you book your journey online, any ticket offered in connection with the timetable or itinerary produced by the journey planner will be accepted as a permitted route". This covered situations where a bug in a journey planner offered a route that would otherwise not be permitted. For reasons unknown, that sentence has unfortunately been removed. An archive of the page shows how it used to look: https://web.archive.org/web/2019122..._fares/ticket_types.aspx#Routeing information
Even without this statement, the routing given by a journey planner remains valid so all this does it makes it harder to prove the validity to a ticket examiner (as I found out myself a few days ago).
Would anyone be able to shed some light as to the reason for this removal and if anyone with the power to do so is reading then could it be reinstated?
Cheers,
FQ.
I recently noticed that the page on the national rail website giving information on ticketing has had a paragraph removed. Previously on this page - https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/ticket_types.aspx#Routeing information - there was an extract that read "When you book your journey online, any ticket offered in connection with the timetable or itinerary produced by the journey planner will be accepted as a permitted route". This covered situations where a bug in a journey planner offered a route that would otherwise not be permitted. For reasons unknown, that sentence has unfortunately been removed. An archive of the page shows how it used to look: https://web.archive.org/web/2019122..._fares/ticket_types.aspx#Routeing information
Even without this statement, the routing given by a journey planner remains valid so all this does it makes it harder to prove the validity to a ticket examiner (as I found out myself a few days ago).
Would anyone be able to shed some light as to the reason for this removal and if anyone with the power to do so is reading then could it be reinstated?
Cheers,
FQ.