Such as the local MP's view, and a brief meeting - perhaps just a coffee - with the Minister or a key adviser, perhaps with a relevant public servant in attendance.
I don’t understand this from railfan99.
I have read all of the Rother Valley submission to the public enquiry.
It was & is amazingly professional. It responds politely & carefully to all the criticism raised & is obviously the detailed work of consummate experts.
Read the documents & you will see that the Rother Valley board deserved to win.
It was nothing to do with a coffee & a brief meeting!
The only pity is that it took so long for the Inspector to decide.
No criticism of him. His report is also impressive & I would say watertight in the event of an appeal from the two landowners who stand to lose small areas of grazing land.