At_traction
Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 291
Related to a thread about Edward Stanford's 1864 map of London with topical railway propositions in "General discussion" (but the question in question (haha) will be probably actually better served here):
The online map shows the route for a "North Metropolitan Railway 1866", proposed but never carried out.
The railway is located to the north of the North London Railway, in the east joining GER Seven Sisters branch at Hackney Downs and crossing GER at Stratford, then joining the LT&SR at West Ham and extending towards North Woolwich roughly alongside the GER Woolwich branch:
http://london1864.com/stanford27.htm
Towards west, the line carries on north of the NLR, routed around north of Hampstead and then joining "Midland & South-Western Junction Rly" ('Super Outer Circle') near Cricklewood.
http://london1864.com/stanford06.htm
Don't know whether the name relates to the Metropolitan Railway Co., with its original name in the 1850s being the same, with the word "North", but as the line never seems to join the GWR route (except perhaps via the connection with Midland & South-Western and then to Willesden Junction), it seems probable that the route was to be more along the line of the North London Railway, as an independent company.
Any background on the company and the proposed line?
The online map shows the route for a "North Metropolitan Railway 1866", proposed but never carried out.
The railway is located to the north of the North London Railway, in the east joining GER Seven Sisters branch at Hackney Downs and crossing GER at Stratford, then joining the LT&SR at West Ham and extending towards North Woolwich roughly alongside the GER Woolwich branch:
http://london1864.com/stanford27.htm
Towards west, the line carries on north of the NLR, routed around north of Hampstead and then joining "Midland & South-Western Junction Rly" ('Super Outer Circle') near Cricklewood.
http://london1864.com/stanford06.htm
Don't know whether the name relates to the Metropolitan Railway Co., with its original name in the 1850s being the same, with the word "North", but as the line never seems to join the GWR route (except perhaps via the connection with Midland & South-Western and then to Willesden Junction), it seems probable that the route was to be more along the line of the North London Railway, as an independent company.
Any background on the company and the proposed line?
Last edited: