I hope no one on that train was on it because its booked to use the York avoiding lines...Yes it has although the stopper caught it up again while it waited for a stone train to cross at Doncaster
Last edited:
I hope no one on that train was on it because its booked to use the York avoiding lines...Yes it has although the stopper caught it up again while it waited for a stone train to cross at Doncaster
It went via York station. Through P5. I was a bit dissapointed it never used the York avoider but oh well maybe next timeI hope no one on that train was on it because its booked to use the York avoiding lines...
They better expect awful publicity and a shedload of litigation if they are dumb enough to do any such thing. How to completely destroy your credibility in one easy lesson....That is very, very naughty if they intend to use that to refuse boarding (as their Twitter implies) rather than just to avoid any more Anytimes being sold "for" those trains.
If l was an affected passenger l'd sue their asses off. Being new is no excuse for incompetence, breach of contract and very possibly consumer legislation.Posters are so harsh and judgemental. Give the guys running Lumo a break, eh? Setting up a new train operator really is no easy task and - of course - they will make some mistakes at first. Being supportive, rather than kicking them at every opportunity, would be great. I do expect they have been surprised by the level of demand - but that's fantastic to see.
Agreed.You don't know how they are going to deal with the issue yet (if, indeed, there is an issue). I hope they have a successful launch day tomorrow.
Re your last sentence. I'd missed how old some of the posts that l'd replied to were. The tweet sent out by the company was the source of the concern/confusion. For what it's worth l'm glad that appears to have been unjustified.Is it possible to get a feel for the total number of passengers on the train, because it seems as if the disaster predicted over the last few days hasn’t come close…
Those getting their retaliation in first must be rather disappointed![]()
Agreed.There were no checks at all at Edinburgh, Morpeth or Newcastle. Still some seats free from Newcastle, so Lumo's tweet was entirely unjustified fearmongering IMO.
Absolutely.Hopefully it hasn't caused anyone to feel they had to abandon their journey and lose e.g. money on a hotel, or pay more for a LNER walk-up fare.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I remain of the view that selling open tickets and then saying they are in effect not open tickets is bait and switch and thus not lawful. The Tweet should not have been sent, and the situation managed a different way.
I have no issue with them setting the CR flag to prevent more non-reserved sales (practically they had to do the same as LNER otherwise they'd end up swamped), but it's what they were saying to existing purchasers of their dedicated Anytime tickets that isn't on.
Sounds promising.I understand Avanti are fitting the same seats (though with a slightly different cushion) into the Pendolinos in the same layout as they currently have - this should bode well for a legroom improvement as it's presently quite bad, and the current seats are quite thick backed. Hopefully the thin armrest will mean they can fit one on the window side, too.
That's the only reason I'm going to use itI hope no one on that train was on it because its booked to use the York avoiding lines...
I agreeCan't help but think todays shambles highlights the problems of microfleets, if it was an LNER service failing another set may have been found on Craigentinny, yet with LUmO the minute there is a set failure its game over.
As with so many things on the railway, they work so well on paper, but in practice there just isn't the resilience.
And I hope Lumo is successful, as fast limited stop IC trains is what the country needs more of, its just a shame the franchised operators are so keen to make so called express trains stop everywhere!
Accidental typo?Lump only running between Doncaster and Edinburgh
Auto correct or fat fingers!Accidental typo?![]()
If you have a seat reservation for our other services then this still stands and you can still board your original train. If our additional service runs at a better time for you then you are welcome to change. We hope this doesn’t inconvenience you too much and we look forward to welcoming you on board!
Interesting! I recall some discussion of what they'd do when the ECML is shut and a tie up with HT is a logical move and far simpler than borrow an 802 to run a service themselves.Lump only running between Doncaster and Edinburgh when ECML services are diverted via Lincoln during November/December weekends. Connections made with Hull Trains...
Planned Engineering Works & Upcoming Work | Lumo
Find out more about upcoming engineering works and affected dates so you can plan your train journey and avoid disruption when travelling with Lumo.www.lumo.co.uk
Interesting! I recall some discussion of what they'd do when the ECML is shut and a tie up with HT is a logical move and far simpler than borrow an 802 to run a service themselves.
Be interesting to see how practical it is when they start running more than two trains per day (where reducing to one isn't quite so extreme) and also whether HT will run the connecting services as 10-car.
Same as XC I'd imagine and bus to/from Newcastle!or for next autumn when ECML sees weekend diversions via Carlisle
If I recall correctly there’s a restriction that prevents franchised TOCs from providing units to open access operators for passenger service. Hull Trains when they first launched used 170s hired in from Anglia Railways but were forced to obtain their own units not long afterwards.Could Hull Trains in theory borrow a TPE 802 for extra strength? (As it's not like the TPE 802s are heavily used on the current timetable with no Newcastle - Manchester Airport services)
I think it's not the principle of hiring that's the problem but a) how they account it and b) whether DfT (etc) perceive it as at detriment to the franchise service. The latter is the harder one to resolve.If I recall correctly there’s a restriction that prevents franchised TOCs from providing units to open access operators for passenger service. Hull Trains when they first launched used 170s hired in from Anglia Railways but were forced to obtain their own units not long afterwards.
Would you not have to pay to collect in a similar way it works with XC?The ECS for the 10:25 Edinburgh is running late at King's Cross
Interestingly the LNER TVMs refused to print off the Lumo tickets but the Great Northern ones did.
No, XC are the only retailer to charge such a fee AFAIK.Would you not have to pay to collect in a similar way it works with XC?
Pretty much full & standing on the Edinburgh train this morning. It will probably empty out a bit at Newcastle judging by the seat reservations
Haven't Friday - Sundays been historically busy on both the WCML/ECML though? This doesn't strike me as particularly newsworthy.Reports on Facebook of huge overcrowding yesterday.
Haven't Friday - Sundays been historically busy on both the WCML/ECML though? This doesn't strike me as particularly newsworthy.
Pretty much full & standing on the Edinburgh train this morning. It will probably empty out a bit at Newcastle judging by the seat reservations
Who is operating the Twitter Account and Email Address and Phone Number of Lumo? Is it run directly by them? By another First Group TOC? By some outsourced agency? Capita? I notice that Lumo and FTPE and GWR and Avanti all seem to be giving out links to this strange new "railhelp" website in response to questions on Twitter so wondering if all First Group TOCs customer services are all run from the same place?