The protections the rail industry has to ensure passengers get home are actually very good. I don’t necessarily agree with the position that some people have, that the railway is some rapacious beast out to mug passengers at every turn (individual cases exist, and some TOCs are better than others, but I’m talking about a general principle).
I don’t agree the Airport Advance fundamentally extends the protections afforded to a passenger over subsequent tickets, beyond the terms and conditions their tickets offer.
I don’t agree that any potential test of this would be in the passenger interest either. It will either fail, and a court/RDG deem my position correct, or it’ll succeed and result in pressure for TPE to discontinue the ticket. The Virgin railcard easement was discontinued primarily due to internal and long term politicking within the industry in very similar circumstances, and ended up making many passengers worse off as a result.
I always try to look at the bigger picture.
I don’t agree the Airport Advance fundamentally extends the protections afforded to a passenger over subsequent tickets, beyond the terms and conditions their tickets offer.
I don’t agree that any potential test of this would be in the passenger interest either. It will either fail, and a court/RDG deem my position correct, or it’ll succeed and result in pressure for TPE to discontinue the ticket. The Virgin railcard easement was discontinued primarily due to internal and long term politicking within the industry in very similar circumstances, and ended up making many passengers worse off as a result.
I always try to look at the bigger picture.