• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Merseyrail Class 777 introduction updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,982
Location
Southport
There was plenty of time for a 2022 introduction as well. I'll believe you when I see it with my own two eyes.
There wasn’t a single second of 2022 with agreements with both the RMT and ASLEF in place so there was no opportunity for any training or introduction. That might change within weeks.
To be launched April 1st 2024.

So I've been informed by a very reliable source :)
Isn’t Headbolt Lane supposed to be open by then?
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,007
So nothing à la TPE 2017 then, where they ran one train on the 30/12?
Why would they? The TPE pantomime was apparently because they made a franchise commitment to run the LHCS that year and true to form TPE did the minimum amount possible. There is no franchise commitment to run these units. There isn't even a franchise.
 

Pacef8

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2020
Messages
404
Location
Wirral
So a few years ago i took this in pre production.
2nd October 2018
 

Attachments

  • CB9BE705-DD81-4C6C-81C0-B94102C3137E.jpeg
    CB9BE705-DD81-4C6C-81C0-B94102C3137E.jpeg
    533.5 KB · Views: 207

MattRat

On Moderation
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
2,084
Location
Liverpool
There wasn’t a single second of 2022 with agreements with both the RMT and ASLEF in place so there was no opportunity for any training or introduction. That might change within weeks.
Well they were supposed to have an agreement sometime in 2022. And now you are saying they are supposed to have an agreement in 2023. Sounds like history could be repeating itself.....
 

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,179
Well they were supposed to have an agreement sometime in 2022. And now you are saying they are supposed to have an agreement in 2023. Sounds like history could be repeating itself.....
Except things have moved on and the situation is vastly different :rolleyes:
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,982
Location
Southport
Well they were supposed to have an agreement sometime in 2022. And now you are saying they are supposed to have an agreement in 2023. Sounds like history could be repeating itself.....
The issue is they shouldn’t have ordered or built any new stock without first gaining agreements on how it would be operated, or this was always going to happen.
 

childwallblues

Established Member
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
3,498
Location
Liverpool, UK
The big question is will the 777s enter service before the last 507/508 leaves for Newport? We lost three 507006, 508140/143 this year and undoubtedly more will be on the way in 2023.
 

F262YTJ

Member
Joined
26 May 2013
Messages
91
If not a joke, then how embarrassing for them.
I'd say the OP was being a little satirical with his choice of dates and emoji here.

Seriously, though, I feel that the first quarter of 2023 will see the Kirkby line converted to 777 operation ending this rather excessive and convoluted process.
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,295
Location
Liverpool
Has the work at Southport station begun yet? That at Liverpool Central was postponed after it clashed with a couple of strike days recently. Neither of these necessary preparations seem to have much to do with driver/guard disputes. So why the delay?
 

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,179
Has the work at Southport station begun yet? That at Liverpool Central was postponed after it clashed with a couple of strike days recently. Neither of these necessary preparations seem to have much to do with driver/guard disputes. So why the delay?
They are only required to enable 8 car running on the Southport services, which will be the last line converted over to 777 operation. No real mad panic to get the works done, but there are closures planned for Central over the next few weekends.
 

MattRat

On Moderation
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
2,084
Location
Liverpool
They are only required to enable 8 car running on the Southport services, which will be the last line converted over to 777 operation. No real mad panic to get the works done, but there are closures planned for Central over the next few weekends.
But if Central isn't important to the Kirkby and Ormskirk lines, doesn't that mean we'll only ever get 4 car running?
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,982
Location
Southport
Has the work at Southport station begun yet? That at Liverpool Central was postponed after it clashed with a couple of strike days recently. Neither of these necessary preparations seem to have much to do with driver/guard disputes. So why the delay?
The work at Southport is supposedly to take place this week, but there has been no briefing as to what exactly this work will be. The toilets were closed and demolished before Christmas, being replaced with ‘portal loos’ but have not been refurbished. Besides platform lengths, the platform height works were not completed several years ago.
 

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,179
But if Central isn't important to the Kirkby and Ormskirk lines, doesn't that mean we'll only ever get 4 car running?
Initially, yep. Having 4 cars on those 2 lines will still be a big benefit as they do hold more passengers than a 3 car can. Might be fun for a while though at peak!
 

Liverpool 507

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2018
Messages
609
Location
Merseyside
777007 has moved to Kirkdale this afternoon following 6 weeks of stabling at Southport. 777001 is in Birkdale sidings.

Presumably another rotation will take place with units that have been having regular FFR moves.

The platform extension works at Ainsdale are more or less complete to accommodate x2 777s.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,067
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Why would they? The TPE pantomime was apparently because they made a franchise commitment to run the LHCS that year and true to form TPE did the minimum amount possible. There is no franchise commitment to run these units. There isn't even a franchise.
Somebody, somewhere must have had an objective to get a 777 into passenger service by a certain date.
In the background, Stadler will want payment against delivery milestones.
The Rosco (or whoever is putting up the money for the trains) will also be financially involved.
There might not be a franchise, but there will be contracts.
 

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,179
Somebody, somewhere must have had an objective to get a 777 into passenger service by a certain date.
In the background, Stadler will want payment against delivery milestones.
The Rosco (or whoever is putting up the money for the trains) will also be financially involved.
There might not be a franchise, but there will be contracts.
Merseytravel are the ROSCO here. It'll be up to them and Stadler to agree how to handle delays, whilst Merseyrail will just lease whatever they need (though obviously they're also under the direction of the franchise holder, Merseytravel, to lease the 777s as soon as they can).

From what I know, all parties have a great working relationship (the Kirkdale depot is Stadlers UK HQ) and all of the issues are well understood and pragmatically being dealt with. It's much more integrated an approach than other TOCs might be able to manage if the same issues occurred and the DFT were the ones pulling strings.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,007
Somebody, somewhere must have had an objective to get a 777 into passenger service by a certain date.
Irrelevant. MerseyTravel and Steve Rotherham having an objective isn't a franchise commitment. Merseyrail are the concession holder and they can't operate any services until staff are trained, and they are not. Merseyrail can't make commitments, they are just paid to run the service.
In the background, Stadler will want payment against delivery milestones.
The Rosco (or whoever is putting up the money for the trains) will also be financially involved.
There might not be a franchise, but there will be contracts.
Of no relevance to the units entering service whatsoever. The contracts between Stadler and MerseyTravel will relate to units being accepted and ready for service. Stadler aren't going to care whether they actually carry passengers, just that they have fulfilled their contractual commitments to deliver units that are ready to doing so.

From what I know, all parties have a great working relationship (the Kirkdale depot is Stadlers UK HQ) and all of the issues are well understood and pragmatically being dealt with. It's much more integrated an approach than other TOCs might be able to manage if the same issues occurred and the DFT were the ones pulling strings.
It is quite bizarre that you should sing the praises of devolution when this fiasco puts anything on the rest of the network to shame. The whole thing has been handled abysmally from the day the trains were ordered.
 
Last edited:

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,067
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Irrelevant. MerseyTravel and Steve Rotherham having an objective isn't a franchise commitment. Merseyrail are the concession holder and they can't operate any services until staff are trained, and they are not. Merseyrail can't make commitments, they are just paid to run the service.

Of no relevance to the units entering service whatsoever. The contracts between Stadler and MerseyTravel will relate to units being accepted and ready for service. Stadler aren't going to care whether they actually carry passengers, just that they have fulfilled their contractual commitments to deliver units that are ready to doing so.
Well as I said, somebody is footing the bill for delays in getting the 777s into service (and the POP fleet to the dismantlers).
I suspect it is the Merseyside taxpayers.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,007
Of course somebody is paying for the units that have been accepted for traffic but that has absolutely nothing to do with a franchise commitment to carry passengers by a certain date.
 

Nicholas Lewis

On Moderation
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,271
Location
Surrey
It is quite bizarre that you should sing the praises of devolution when this fiasco puts anything on the rest of the network to shame. The whole thing has been handled abysmally from the day the trains were ordered.
SWR and the 701's are vying with them for worst spot
I suspect it is the Merseyside taxpayers.
It is MerseyRail gets no DfT grant although via other routes LCA gets plenty of central government cash.
 

Top