• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Merseyrail Class 777 introduction updates

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,791
They really should have gotten the passengers off quicker though, it's not in the middle of nowhere and the line was blocked by that train so it wouldnt have been too much effort to get an isolation and a few people in high vis to help the passengers along to the nearest platform. The railway is so risk adverse now they won't let anyone make a decision when it comes to strandings.
It isn't risk aversion though, as investigations into similar incidents where people are trapped for hours have shown, passengers just self evacuate which increases the risk.

Cowardice, indifference, self interest or whatever, but not risk aversion.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sansyy

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
173
Location
Chester
I can't understand why they couldn't have run trains as far as Parkway if the line was only blocked at Hunts Cross.
Probably would've made it more complicated to get services back on the move when the block was mitigated. Easier if all trains are cancelled so they don't have a bunch of passengers dotted around the network in places that make it harder to assist in moving the faulty train.
 

mcnw35282

Member
Joined
27 May 2014
Messages
230
Location
Sin Tellins
Because I just got on a Liverpool bound train at Hunts Cross from platform 2 for the first time ever.

I’m guessing it’s got a lot to do with the 2x 777s currently occupying platform 3.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,566
Because I just got on a Liverpool bound train at Hunts Cross from platform 2 for the first time ever.

I’m guessing it’s got a lot to do with the 2x 777s currently occupying platform 3.
Is that the failure from yesterday? Labelled up as 5T61 on open train times. Curiously, realtime trains only shows trains using platform 2 from 12:46 but no schedule for 5T61. A 5T62 14:05 to Kirkdale schedule has just appeared.
 

karlbbb

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2009
Messages
356
5T62 now nearly to Sandhills and 2S35 in its usual spot on platform 3 at Hunts Cross. Still showing "4CAR" in the far berth at platform 3 so I guess 777028 is still sat there?
 

deltic14

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2019
Messages
162
Location
Ossett
I can't understand why they couldn't have run trains as far as Parkway if the line was only blocked at Hunts Cross.
I was on the following Hunts Cross departure from Liverpool Central 15 minutes after the errant 777 028 departed which was formed of 507 017 and 507 020. We terminated at Liverpool South Parkway and were told the train in front had failed. The train crew expected that we would be turned back fairly quickly using the crossover just north of the station. However, a short while later we were told the train wasn't going anywhere as the route had been set up for 777 028 and we could not at that time be signalled out.
Another Hunts Cross train had become stuck I think at Cressington which I also think may have been a 507.
Looking at RTT it seems that they started to turn back trains at Central fairly quickly.
It became obvious fairly quickly to myself and another enthusiast out for the 507's that the only way back into the game was by bus back to Liverpool.
The Southport line was in chaos - many gaps in the service frequency and three car sets on services in the rush hour and all because of a 777....
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,566
I was on the following Hunts Cross departure from Liverpool Central 15 minutes after the errant 777 028 departed which was formed of 507 017 and 507 020. We terminated at Liverpool South Parkway and were told the train in front had failed. The train crew expected that we would be turned back fairly quickly using the crossover just north of the station. However, a short while later we were told the train wasn't going anywhere as the route had been set up for 777 028 and we could not at that time be signalled out.
That's a bit strange. The failure was quite a way away from Liverpool South Parkway. It's a signalled move off the up platform back towards Liverpool and is protected by signal 99 shown on the map below.

 

Bow Fell

Member
Joined
12 Feb 2020
Messages
259
Location
UK
It’s not strange in the slightest, the failed train was occupying a track circuit of which the overlap of that meant the points at South Parkway couldn’t be used.
 

childwallblues

Established Member
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
2,868
Location
Liverpool, UK
Because I just got on a Liverpool bound train at Hunts Cross from platform 2 for the first time ever.

I’m guessing it’s got a lot to do with the 2x 777s currently occupying platform 3.
Well if the errant 777s are in Platform 3 any Merseyrail services reaching Hunts Cross will have to use Platform 2 which is third rail fitted.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,566
It’s not strange in the slightest, the failed train was occupying a track circuit of which the overlap of that meant the points at South Parkway couldn’t be used.
I disagree. It is strange. Why would it be designed like that? Granted the exact location of the failure was unfortunate.

EDIT: To elaborate, are you saying that if a Liverpool bound train failed at Liverpool South Parkway, you wouldn't be able to terminate subsequent trains there and turn them back? If the overlap is the problem, why wasn't the cross over installed further away from the signal?
 
Last edited:

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,085
It isn't risk aversion though, as investigations into similar incidents where people are trapped for hours have shown, passengers just self evacuate which increases the risk.

Cowardice, indifference, self interest or whatever, but not risk aversion.
You can be so risk adverse to one risk (getting passengers onto the tracks in an evacuation) that you end up increasing the risk of other things happening. So yeah, it’s still being risk adverse, and ironically so.
 

deltic14

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2019
Messages
162
Location
Ossett
Points could be moved over by hand and signal passed at danger to next signal
Maybe that is what happened but it would take time to organise. According to RTT the train behind mine (2U19) that was stuck at Cressington arrived at South Parkway at 13:42 some 151 minutes late. For that to happen 2U18 had to have vacated the platform it occupied.

This begs the question when did the rescue 777 meet up with 777 028 ? Did it work wrong line or did they send it right line after getting the two 507 trains out of the way ?

Out of curiosity I would love to know how they solved the problem.
 

prod_pep

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2010
Messages
1,506
Location
Liverpool
Off to a racing start this morning on the Kirkby Headbolt route. A 777 has given up the ghost at Fazak and buses are being organised. For some reason the phrase 'one swallow doesn't make a summer' comes to mind.
 

Sam 76

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2021
Messages
335
Location
Southport.
Off to a racing start this morning on the Kirkby Headbolt route. A 777 has given up the ghost at Fazak and buses are being organised. For some reason the phrase 'one swallow doesn't make a summer' comes to mind.
This is what happens when politics gets in the way of common sense… I’m sure Stadler just despair at this point. Imagine effectively saying the /1s are not ready and someone who’s not on the industry forcing them in anyway to save face
 

mcnw35282

Member
Joined
27 May 2014
Messages
230
Location
Sin Tellins
Well if the errant 777s are in Platform 3 any Merseyrail services reaching Hunts Cross will have to use Platform 2 which is third rail fitted.
It's charming replies like this and your previous one that makes this place such a warm and cosy environment...

This is what happens when politics gets in the way of common sense… I’m sure Stadler just despair at this point. Imagine effectively saying the /1s are not ready and someone who’s not on the industry forcing them in anyway to save face
I guess this is what happens when people bitch and moan about having to ride on 40 year old clapped out contraptions and the mayor feels he has to get the new stock in place when it's not ready to keep people happy...
 

Sam 76

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2021
Messages
335
Location
Southport.
It's charming replies like this and your previous one that makes this place such a warm and cosy environment...


I guess this is what happens when people bitch and moan about having to ride on 40 year old clapped out contraptions and the mayor feels he has to get the new stock in place when it's not ready to keep people happy...
There’s absolutely that too. I just refuse to believe that all the blame can be put on Stadlers door. They didn’t become terrible over night at building trains. So when the mayor goes demanding answers, when they were told they weren’t ready what does he expect them to say ?
 

Skie

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,085
At the city region transport committee on the first of Feb, Merseyrail confirmed 8 car testing has commenced and there is an ongoing rollout of software updates to the fleet that are hoped to solve some of the issues with reliability. Also some discussion of performance figures starting to improve, though probably not now given the Hunts Cross kerfuffle.

Video link (no transcript that I can find unfortunately) https://liverpoolcityregion-ca.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/777981/start_time/897000
 

Northerngirl

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2023
Messages
107
Location
Wirral
There’s absolutely that too. I just refuse to believe that all the blame can be put on Stadlers door. They didn’t become terrible over night at building trains. So when the mayor goes demanding answers, when they were told they weren’t ready what does he expect them to say ?
I'm sorry, but what else could he do, they had been sitting in the very visible depot for 3 years, without any obvious progress, which it just ridiculous. Stadler need to sort themselves out, just look at the 555s, just constant delays. Now over a year in and they are still hopless, how much more testing would they need to be introduced flawlessly
 

nigelsporne

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2012
Messages
91
Much has been said in this thread about the problems with the introduction of the 777s. From an outsider there appears to be problems on the manufacturing side as well as a political angle. The only way to get the Mayor to listen I suspect is if there are votes at stake. There have been many valid criticisms expressed but have any of these been aired in the local press? Is it time for a choice letter or two to try and stir things up? Perhaps a local reporter might pick up on the story and the people of Liverpool start to get some answers and hopefully a resolution.
I have travelled on a 777, albeit only a short journey, and I thought they were an improvement. The seats were ok but as I said only a short journey. Perhaps the Mayor ought to commute from Chester or Southport for a week!
 

childwallblues

Established Member
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
2,868
Location
Liverpool, UK
Much has been said in this thread about the problems with the introduction of the 777s. From an outsider there appears to be problems on the manufacturing side as well as a political angle. The only way to get the Mayor to listen I suspect is if there are votes at stake. There have been many valid criticisms expressed but have any of these been aired in the local press? Is it time for a choice letter or two to try and stir things up? Perhaps a local reporter might pick up on the story and the people of Liverpool start to get some answers and hopefully a resolution.
I have travelled on a 777, albeit only a short journey, and I thought they were an improvement. The seats were ok but as I said only a short journey. Perhaps the Mayor ought to commute from Chester or Southport for a week!
In my opinion the local rag The Liverpool Echo does the Mayors bidding for him.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,892
Location
Sheffield
It's Transport for the North's Annual Conference in Liverpool tomorrow so it will be interesting to hear how Merseyrail performs.

Last year it was in Newcastle and TPE rather stole the show when delegates discovered first hand how dire their services had become. Not sure Merseyrail can surpass that but you never know.
 

prod_pep

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2010
Messages
1,506
Location
Liverpool
There have been many valid criticisms expressed but have any of these been aired in the local press? Is it time for a choice letter or two to try and stir things up? Perhaps a local reporter might pick up on the story and the people of Liverpool start to get some answers and hopefully a resolution.
This is a fair point. The Echo were apparently blissfully unaware of all the strife on the Kirkby line with the 777s until a couple of people tweeted one of their 'journalists' directly. They have been astonishingly obtuse in covering the roll-out if their website is any yardstick.

777028 is still marooned at Hunts Cross, with the 507s having to be driven very carefully into platform 3.
 

karlbbb

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2009
Messages
356
This is a fair point. The Echo were apparently blissfully unaware of all the strife on the Kirkby line with the 777s until a couple of people tweeted one of their 'journalists' directly. They have been astonishingly obtuse in covering the roll-out if their website is any yardstick.

777028 is still marooned at Hunts Cross, with the 507s having to be driven very carefully into platform 3.
Very surprised it's still stuck! I guess if the report a few pages ago that they couldn't drop the pickup shoes is true then that could explain it. I guess that would also preclude charging of the "depot" batteries meaning they likely can't even power the train on at all.
 

Top