Why, what paperwork has been signed recently?Coming along now. Amazing how quickly things move once the paperwork is signed
Why, what paperwork has been signed recently?Coming along now. Amazing how quickly things move once the paperwork is signed
Coming along now. Amazing how quickly things move once the paperwork is signed
Yes. I've travelled down the MML 3 times in the last week and I think in terms of piling at least, I'm now thinking more in terms of what hasn't been done, rather than what has. The biggest gaps in piling seem to be Kettering between the A14 and A43 bridges, around Wellingborough station and immediately North of Bedford station. Plus no electrification work at all between Glendon Jnc & Harborough.
I thought Glendon jct was the limit of electrification, well on the Main line at least.
Why, what paperwork has been signed recently?
There's been talk of extending the wires up to Market Harborough station. Given MH station is only a couple of miles north of Braybrooke it would make sense to do this. However, when does making sense come in to it when politics is concerned.Once the electrification is up and running I can see the tabloid press having a field day, with the electrified lines through Desborough, but no electric trains.
There are plenty of electric trains going off lease in time to be deployed on the line pending new deliveries for the TOC. Just look at the examples of this in Scotland (E - G) and when the Airedale line was completed!Once the electrification is up and running I can see the tabloid press having a field day, with the electrified lines through Desborough, but no electric trains.
Airedale that was a terrierThere are plenty of electric trains going off lease in time to be deployed on the line pending new deliveries for the TOC. Just look at the examples of this in Scotland (E - G) and when the Airedale line was completed!
The 308s that we’re drafted onto the Leeds to Bradford, Skipton and Ilkley services were the dogs. A bit of cost cutting at the time.Airedale that was a terrier
Wires would come after the track's been realigned; not much point in wiring and then re-wiring to accommodate the realigned track!How will wiring to Market Harborough (assuming that happens) tie in with the track realignment, in terms of the timing of works?
The OLE *might* go as far as the track is due to be unaltered before it enters the realigned area; whether the realignment happens before or after such an event remains to be seen.But will the track be re-aligned in advance of wiring, or will wiring come up short of the station and then electrification work will stop there while they finish the station?
It's not really the case that the wiring is starting at Bedford and working northwards. Rather that supports and wiring appear in apparently random sequence along the route but presumably dictated by factors that forum users aren't aware of.But will the track be re-aligned in advance of wiring, or will wiring come up short of the station and then electrification work will stop there while they finish the station?
I wonder if those crossovers will stay where they are. In the Leicester MAS plans when they included the Harborough work the crossovers were to be on straight track north of the station, and as I understood it they were moved south of the station on to the curve so as not to queer the pitch if the re-alignment could be done later. They are perhaps more reliable now, but there was a time when keeping them in good order on that curve seemed to be quite a problem. And they presumably restrict the amount of cant on the curve.Assuming wiring comes to Harborough at all (not definitively confirmed as far as I know, though some semi-official mentions suggest it is so) I think it will stop at the north end of the platforms. There are crossovers just off the south end so any train that for some reason couldn't continue on diesel could turn back, and no crossovers to the north (unless some are being added) so no reason to continue beyond. If this is so then there will only be maybe 10 OLE supports in the area of realignment.
...
Assuming wiring comes to Harborough at all (not definitively confirmed as far as I know, though some semi-official mentions suggest it is so) I think it will stop at the north end of the platforms.
Overruns are generally for junctions, in case the train is mis-routed and to avoid having to modify the junction wiring if the non-electrified route is electrified later. I don't see any need for overrun if the electrification simply ends at a station, other than perhaps a mast or two to terminate beyond the end of the platform. I think this is similar to what happens at Bedford for example (only the siding north of the platforms is electrified) and until recently the east end of Manchester Victoria.A 'normal' electrification would surely allow for overruns. Would you not bother with this if it's all bi-modes?
Indeed, this was stated in Modern Railways at the time of the re-signalling and it would make more sense to have the crossovers on the straight. I've not heard any suggestion of relocating them though.I wonder if those crossovers will stay where they are. In the Leicester MAS plans when they included the Harborough work the crossovers were to be on straight track north of the station, and as I understood it they were moved south of the station on to the curve so as not to queer the pitch if the re-alignment could be done later. They are perhaps more reliable now, but there was a time when keeping them in good order on that curve seemed to be quite a problem. And they presumably restrict the amount of cant on the curve.
How about freight, 75mph maximum? Accommodating those ambling trains (whether electric or diesel) would decimate even a 6tph service.Travelled from Nottingham to London this week the first time since April. I could see lots of work being done on the slow lines between Kettering and Bedford. It made me wonder just how much use the slow lines are actually going to get after electrification to justify all that expence. Isn’t it going to be basically 6 trains per hour each way. 2 Sheffield, 2 Nottingham and 2 Corby. I can’t see the slow lines being needed that much for passenger trains except for during blockages on the fast lines. ...
How about freight, 75mph maximum? Accommodating those ambling trains (whether electric or diesel) would decimate even a 6tph service.
I was commenting on the reinstatement of four tracks. That allows the slower freight services to keep clear of the express workings. Providing OLE on all those tracks gives flexibility to run all services on all tracks into the future. Over the next 50+ years the incremental cost of wiring the other two tracks will give operational flexibility and allow electric freight to run through from the NLL to wherever the MML wires connect to in the future. We may see bi-mode locos like the class 88s (but with more than a final mile diesel capability) as a way of dealing with the removal of local pollution from freight.I understand that, but will the freight use electric power? I can’t see them changing loco somewhere like Kettering or Corby or are they planning on using bi mode freight loco’s.
I was commenting on the reinstatement of four tracks. That allows the slower freight services to keep clear of the express workings. Providing OLE on all those tracks gives flexibility to run all services on all tracks into the future. Over the next 50+ years the incremental cost of wiring the other two tracks will give operational flexibility and allow electric freight to run through from the NLL to wherever the MML wires connect to in the future. We may see bi-mode locos like the class 88s (but with more than a final mile diesel capability) as a way of dealing with the removal of local pollution from freight.