IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!Still not finishing GW electrification to Bristol or Oxford then?
IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!Still not finishing GW electrification to Bristol or Oxford then?
It's a curiosity that a massive resignalling project with new technology is considered a "renewal" while electrification is an "enhancement".IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
Its a renewal if it just delivers the same capability that it is there now as part of life expiry, if you get something for free as part of it then its a bonus. If its a resignalling to deliver a required trains service spec or timetable, then its normally an enhancement. Electrification is clearly an enhancement, the same way as if any contact wire needs fixing its a renewal.It's a curiosity that a massive resignalling project with new technology is considered a "renewal" while electrification is an "enhancement".
In some cases they go together (eg for TRU).
I guess resignalling is considered renewing an existing and life-expired asset, without which the railway cannot run.
How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
The railway is clearly "special" when it comes to these things.what has happened to the old "Enhancement Delivery Plans" that used to be produced?
Aren't all the likely enhancements until at least 2040 simply those listed in the Integrated Rail Plan? Is there funding available for anything else?IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
Currently, there is minimal enhancement investment approved for the Southern Region in the Rail Network Enhancement Pipeline (RNEP) in the next ten years.
This plan is consistent with that expectation.
The IRP was, IIRC, a plan for the Midlands and North of England only, written in the expectation that HS2 would reach Manchester and the East Midlands.Aren't all the likely enhancements until at least 2040 simply those listed in the Integrated Rail Plan? Is there funding available for anything else?
...or are assumed to not be worthy of consideration because all of the likely funding until 2040 is allocated. It isn't clear that it can be assumed that there will be material enhancements outside the scope of HS2 / IRP / Network North in that period, although the Wales and Western Strategic Plan isn't as clear on the matter as the Southern one I quoted.Enhancements elsewhere were not considered
And in all probability a change in government.The IRP was, IIRC, a plan for the Midlands and North of England only, written in the expectation that HS2 would reach Manchester and the East Midlands.
Enhancements elsewhere were not considered, and in any case the IRP is now discredited until reissued to reflect the current HS2/Network North policy.
Enhancement plans were removed from NR some years ago, the DfT is responsible now, and they specify chosen enhancements as discrete items rather than having a five year programme. Apparently that is a better ideaThe railway is clearly "special" when it comes to these things.
The investment/"enhancements" plans of other utilities are usually agreed with the regulator and published in advance of the regulatory period beginning.
If, for example, National Grid were to fail to publish its investment plans in this way, it would probably be in breach of its license. It'd be a major failure.
Network Rail's failure to publish an enhancements plan suggests either
1. NWR has not finalised its plan, and is still trying to trim the list to a set of affordable enhancements
2. NWR has finalised its plan, but has not been given permission to publish it
If the answer were (1), then ORR, DfT and Harper would probably be demanding heads must roll at NWR, as failing to get the plan sorted would be a major failure of leadership.
So if the answer's 2 (as I think), then the failure to publish, combined with a lack of political stink tells me it's a political choice.
And other than a few industry journos like Roger Ford, this has not - as far as I can tell - been picked up by the wider media (which also shows how poorly understood these kinds of regulated industries are by them).