• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Network Rail CP7 Plans

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,725
Location
Mold, Clwyd
IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
It's a curiosity that a massive resignalling project with new technology is considered a "renewal" while electrification is an "enhancement".
In some cases they go together (eg for TRU).
I guess resignalling is considered renewing an existing and life-expired asset, without which the railway cannot run.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,007
It's a curiosity that a massive resignalling project with new technology is considered a "renewal" while electrification is an "enhancement".
In some cases they go together (eg for TRU).
I guess resignalling is considered renewing an existing and life-expired asset, without which the railway cannot run.
Its a renewal if it just delivers the same capability that it is there now as part of life expiry, if you get something for free as part of it then its a bonus. If its a resignalling to deliver a required trains service spec or timetable, then its normally an enhancement. Electrification is clearly an enhancement, the same way as if any contact wire needs fixing its a renewal.
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
735
How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!

what has happened to the old "Enhancement Delivery Plans" that used to be produced?
The railway is clearly "special" when it comes to these things.
The investment/"enhancements" plans of other utilities are usually agreed with the regulator and published in advance of the regulatory period beginning.
If, for example, National Grid were to fail to publish its investment plans in this way, it would probably be in breach of its license. It'd be a major failure.

Network Rail's failure to publish an enhancements plan suggests either
1. NWR has not finalised its plan, and is still trying to trim the list to a set of affordable enhancements
2. NWR has finalised its plan, but has not been given permission to publish it

If the answer were (1), then ORR, DfT and Harper would probably be demanding heads must roll at NWR, as failing to get the plan sorted would be a major failure of leadership.
So if the answer's 2 (as I think), then the failure to publish, combined with a lack of political stink tells me it's a political choice.

And other than a few industry journos like Roger Ford, this has not - as far as I can tell - been picked up by the wider media (which also shows how poorly understood these kinds of regulated industries are by them).
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,909
IIRC these are the renewals plans, not the enhancements. How much money will be available for any of those remains to be seen!
Aren't all the likely enhancements until at least 2040 simply those listed in the Integrated Rail Plan? Is there funding available for anything else?

The Strategic Business Plan for the Southern Region (2024-2029) said that there would be no enhancements in CP7. Page 9 says:
Currently, there is minimal enhancement investment approved for the Southern Region in the Rail Network Enhancement Pipeline (RNEP) in the next ten years.

This plan is consistent with that expectation.
 
Last edited:

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,725
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Aren't all the likely enhancements until at least 2040 simply those listed in the Integrated Rail Plan? Is there funding available for anything else?
The IRP was, IIRC, a plan for the Midlands and North of England only, written in the expectation that HS2 would reach Manchester and the East Midlands.
Enhancements elsewhere were not considered, and in any case the IRP is now discredited until reissued to reflect the current HS2/Network North policy.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,909
Enhancements elsewhere were not considered
...or are assumed to not be worthy of consideration because all of the likely funding until 2040 is allocated. It isn't clear that it can be assumed that there will be material enhancements outside the scope of HS2 / IRP / Network North in that period, although the Wales and Western Strategic Plan isn't as clear on the matter as the Southern one I quoted.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,905
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
The IRP was, IIRC, a plan for the Midlands and North of England only, written in the expectation that HS2 would reach Manchester and the East Midlands.
Enhancements elsewhere were not considered, and in any case the IRP is now discredited until reissued to reflect the current HS2/Network North policy.
And in all probability a change in government.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,774
The railway is clearly "special" when it comes to these things.
The investment/"enhancements" plans of other utilities are usually agreed with the regulator and published in advance of the regulatory period beginning.
If, for example, National Grid were to fail to publish its investment plans in this way, it would probably be in breach of its license. It'd be a major failure.

Network Rail's failure to publish an enhancements plan suggests either
1. NWR has not finalised its plan, and is still trying to trim the list to a set of affordable enhancements
2. NWR has finalised its plan, but has not been given permission to publish it

If the answer were (1), then ORR, DfT and Harper would probably be demanding heads must roll at NWR, as failing to get the plan sorted would be a major failure of leadership.
So if the answer's 2 (as I think), then the failure to publish, combined with a lack of political stink tells me it's a political choice.

And other than a few industry journos like Roger Ford, this has not - as far as I can tell - been picked up by the wider media (which also shows how poorly understood these kinds of regulated industries are by them).
Enhancement plans were removed from NR some years ago, the DfT is responsible now, and they specify chosen enhancements as discrete items rather than having a five year programme. Apparently that is a better idea:rolleyes:
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,754
Location
Leeds
In 2018, a year before the start of CP6. the government announced that it would publish annual updates on the contents of a new rail enhancements pipeline:


In autumn 2019 it published the first update:


No further updates have been published since.

Some time ago, maybe a year, one of the transport ministers said that "people" (presumably ministers, and perhaps Boris Johnson when PM) had been putting too many schemes in the pipeline, and it would be reviewed, thinned out, and then published. It has not happened, but since then we've had Sunak cancelling most of what remained of HS2 and inventing Network North in its place.

Network Rail's own Enhancements Delivery Plans are separate. For England and Wales one was published in 2022 (I can't immediately find a link) and one in 2023:


For Scotland, there was this one in 2022:


They haven't published an update since - perhaps they're too embarrassed because so many schemes are behind the schedule given in 2022.

Too many links to long documents for me to give meaningful quotes.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,956
The Rail Enhacement Pipline (RNEP?) was supposed to have been published ages ago, but ministers keep quoting the season it will be published in, and as Roger Ford says 'Don't Trust a Forecast Based on the Seasons'
 

Top