• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Network Rail reviewing use of steel sleepers

Status
Not open for further replies.

LWB

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2009
Messages
241
I have been waiting for someone to pick up on this line from the RAIB report on the Gloucester derailment. This was caused in part by (so I understand) the difficulty of packing under the hollow sleepers in order to re-establish top without recourse to stone blowers I would have thought that this was a major reversal - or am I wrong?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,929
Location
Nottingham
The report says Railtrack standardised on steel sleepers for secondary routes, but some secondary routes carry heavy freight so they took something of a pounding. Didn't the Settle and Carlisle suffer this too?
 

Ploughman

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
2,892
Location
Near where the 3 ridings meet
When doing some relay work between Skipton and Hellifield a few years back, the policy was Up line Concrete and Down line Steel due to Loaded and Empty trains.
Has this backfired on NWR?
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,983
Nothing new. Been fairly common knowledge for a while now. One job going in for Christmas was almost scotched last minute by a change from steel to concrete.
 

Trog

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2009
Messages
1,546
Location
In Retirement.
Nothing wrong with steel sleepers if used in the right place. That being a minor line with light traffic, and the sleepers being installed on decent ballast.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
I've cast a brief eye over the report. The difficulty of repairing the ballast formation under steel sleepers was mentioned: shovel-packing isn't practical, and neither is stoneblowing. Given these inconveniences, what are the advantages of steel sleepers? I assume lower cost is one...
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,929
Location
Nottingham
The only one I can think of is that they stack inside one another so are easier to transport than concrete.
 

Trog

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2009
Messages
1,546
Location
In Retirement.
I've cast a brief eye over the report. The difficulty of repairing the ballast formation under steel sleepers was mentioned: shovel-packing isn't practical, and neither is stoneblowing. Given these inconveniences, what are the advantages of steel sleepers? I assume lower cost is one...

The advantages of steel sleepers are that the overall cost per yard of relaying is reduced, in that although the sleepers themselves are dearer than concrete. By installing them you save the cost of re-ballasting, as they sit on top of the old crib ballast, so you get 5" more ballast for no expenditure. They are also quick to lay which is another reason they are cheap per yard, this can also be useful if you need to get a lot of relaying done quickly on a line with restricted access.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top