Class 466
Established Member
No, nothing is going to be scrapped. I’ve no idea where that came from to be honest.Oh right, is something still going to be scrapped imminently do you know and can be disclosed?
No, nothing is going to be scrapped. I’ve no idea where that came from to be honest.Oh right, is something still going to be scrapped imminently do you know and can be disclosed?
I'd ask the same question.Do you have access to train performance data in order to back up your claim?
Old bodies (2 - or 1-and-a-bit - cobbled together) on new frames were standard SR practice.Both are correct.
There were both new bodies on old frames for some Subs, or others with old bodies on new frames.
Fingers crossed! I imagine the ones for warm store have already been stood down, though... Can anyone confirm? Hopefully the Beckenham Three will still be there.
Agreed, though you’d have to divide your time between the two as the routes don’t intersect. Lewisham and Petts Wood or Orpington are other obvious places.If i still wanted 465's/466 then it's Londone bridge or Vic.
I assume (rightly or wrongly) that the reason storage is not on a per-rosco basis is because it's SE led and temporary?It was always going to be based on unit reliablilty rather than any particular subclasses or anything.