• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Jersey: Train crashes into station

Status
Not open for further replies.

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,929
Location
Nottingham
Is the problem partly that New York state has the big wealth generator generating taxes that can pay for LIRR and Metro North as well as the Subway, but New Jersey has to support a commuter network of similar size without the same sort of tax base?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

philabos

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
180
Location
Lancaster PA
I do have a question.
Once an inbound train passes the last signal before the buffer stop, say at Kings Cross,
is there an automated system that will halt an over speed train?
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
I do have a question.
Once an inbound train passes the last signal before the buffer stop, say at Kings Cross,
is there an automated system that will halt an over speed train?

Yes and no - TPWS enforces a speed restriction part way along the platform (to 10 mph in the case of the platform at Kings Cross where the buffer stop collision occurred last year), but there is nothing beyond that point so a train could hit the buffer stop at 10 mph (or more if it accelerated after the last set of TPWS timing loops).

To quote from the RAIB accident report:

"Platform 11 is 170 metres long, and will accommodate an eight-car train. The maximum permitted speed for trains entering and leaving King’s Cross station is 15 mph (24 km/h). Platform 11 is fitted with TPWS equipment which is designed to apply an arriving train’s brakes if it is travelling at more than 10 mph (16 km/h) at a point 55 metres from the buffer stops."
 
Last edited:

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Is the problem partly that New York state has the big wealth generator generating taxes that can pay for LIRR and Metro North as well as the Subway, but New Jersey has to support a commuter network of similar size without the same sort of tax base?

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is jointly owned and made a $779m profit last year on revenues of $4.4bn.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,929
Location
Nottingham
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is jointly owned and made a $779m profit last year on revenues of $4.4bn.

This operates the PATH trains that are basically cross-Hudson but some routes penetrate into NJ, as well as airports, road crossings and harbour facilities. However I don't believe it has any involvement in NJ Transit, which provides the majority of commuter rail in the state and was the operator involved in this accident. Does this make it easier for politicians to divert their share of Port Authority profits to other purposes while ignoring the needs of NJ Transit?
 

philabos

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
180
Location
Lancaster PA
Yes and no - TPWS enforces a speed restriction part way along the platform (to 10 mph in the case of the platform at Kings Cross where the buffer stop collision occurred last year), but there is nothing beyond that point so a train could hit the buffer stop at 10 mph (or more if it accelerated after the last set of TPWS timing loops).

To quote from the RAIB accident report:

"Platform 11 is 170 metres long, and will accommodate an eight-car train. The maximum permitted speed for trains entering and leaving King’s Cross station is 15 mph (24 km/h). Platform 11 is fitted with TPWS equipment which is designed to apply an arriving train’s brakes if it is travelling at more than 10 mph (16 km/h) at a point 55 metres from the buffer stops."

Thank you for the response, very interesting.
My understanding is that our PTC was never designed to work on restricted terminal trackage, but I am certainly no expert. I do often wonder why we did not just buy TPWS years ago. Our PTC is far from off the shelf, and some say it is being invented as we trial and error our way along to implementation.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,929
Location
Nottingham
Thank you for the response, very interesting.
My understanding is that our PTC was never designed to work on restricted terminal trackage, but I am certainly no expert. I do often wonder why we did not just buy TPWS years ago. Our PTC is far from off the shelf, and some say it is being invented as we trial and error our way along to implementation.

Reading Wikipedia it seems there isn't even one PTC system, rather a series of different ones used in different parts of the country.
 

Groningen

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Messages
2,866
According a dutch newspaper the train entered the station double the allowed speed. Not 10 miles/16 kilometers, but 21/34. The driver/engineer pulled the emergency break 1 second before it slammed into the buffers.
 

philabos

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
180
Location
Lancaster PA
According a dutch newspaper the train entered the station double the allowed speed. Not 10 miles/16 kilometers, but 21/34. The driver/engineer pulled the emergency break 1 second before it slammed into the buffers.
Throttle at idle and speed 8mph one minute before crash. Then increased to 21mph, and as you say went into emergency 1 second before hitting the buffer.
Question remains what happened in those 59 seconds.
NJT has now announced they will require the conductor to be in the cab with the engineer when entering a terminal station. Knee jerk responses always best.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Investigators have published their initial investigation report. It basically restates all the media leaks over the last couple of weeks. They have also tested the brakes and found them to be mechanically sound and still working though they are unable to test the electrical controls because they were destroyed in the collision. They've also added that the train was short formed as 4 carriages rather than 5 and it was heavily loaded with the conductor saying he was unable to make his way through to conduct ticket checks.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top