• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Old GWR railway halts/works platforms questions?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,786
Location
Devon
Afternoon everyone.

This is a railway modelling question really but there’s a broader question in this as well.
My friend is making an 0 gauge railway based on something along the lines of the Hemyock branch in the 1970s. He’s been looking at building a small halt halfway along potentially next to a bridge, and wondered if all halts would have had ramps at the end of the platform, or if any had no ramps and just a fence to stop passengers falling off instead?
I was wondering though why all halt platforms seem to have had ramps at both ends if that was the case? Would they have been purely used for the crew assuming that the halt had a path for access anyway?
Here’s a photo of High Halstow Halt taken from the Disused Stations website which shows the kind of thing I’m imagining.


2E9F20A1-3B7C-4B71-9FCC-A4C0424DF784.jpeg

Another possibility is incorporating a works platform but I must admit that I don’t know much about them. Would these have been built in a different way? And did any last into the diesel era?

Thanks for any info.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,879
This may be an urban myth, or even something I've dreamed up myself, but I have a recollection of reading that the original reason for platform end ramps was that in the event of loose or trailing equipment, or out of gauge loads, less damage would be caused by them meeting a gently sloping ramp than if they hit a square, vertical, end of a platform.
Bearing in mind that gauging and tolerances were probably much less scientific in the early days of railway building, it seems plausible at least.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,786
Location
Devon
This may be an urban myth, or even something I've dreamed up myself, but I have a recollection of reading that the original reason for platform end ramps was that in the event of loose or trailing equipment, or out of gauge loads, less damage would be caused by them meeting a gently sloping ramp than if they hit a square, vertical, end of a platform.
Bearing in mind that gauging and tolerances were probably much less scientific in the early days of railway building, it seems plausible at least.
That’s an interesting thought. Thanks for that.
I’ve amended the thread title and opening post to include works platforms now.
I feel like I’ve been a bit garbled with this but hopefully anyone reading will understand what I’m trying to say.
 

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,072
Location
St Albans
Ramps at the end of platforms were a long-standing requirement of the Board of Trade who oversaw railway operations from the late 1830s until around 1919. But I've not been able, so far, to find out why they insisted on them.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,975
Location
Hope Valley
I'm pretty sure that it was a Railway Inspectorate 'requirement' that platforms had to have end ramps but don't have my copy immediately to hand.

[Edit]

Just noted in the recently-published New Illustrated History of Her Majesty's Railway Inspectorate from 1840 (page 37) there is a 'Memorandum of some of the Requirements of the Inspecting Officer, 1858'. This includes ramps.

[End of edit]

Remember that 'back in the day', with jointed track and bullhead rail, there was much more patrolling on foot and platelayers needed to able to walk seamlessly up onto platforms to avoid potentially being trapped (at least on double track routes).
 
Last edited:

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,136
As a kid I always understood platform ramps were there to allow rapid evacuation in an emergency. Just one of those snippets of info that everyone knew......whether true or not
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,089
In the event of a slight overrun, or a train longer than the platform, it was far more acceptable then, in the days of slam doors, to jump down onto the ballast. In which case getting back up onto the platform was straightforward.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,051
Location
Airedale
One other point: fences would have been a hazard in the days of slam doors - imagine alighting and walking into the end of one!
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,786
Location
Devon
One other point: fences would have been a hazard in the days of slam doors - imagine alighting and walking into the end of one!
Ah yes, I suppose that could definitely be a problem... :)
Interestingly the only place I’ve found so far that’s had a different arrangement is the former Whitehall Halt that was actually on the Hemyock branch. There’s a couple of photos here (neither are mine but the first one is from the Disused Stations site showing what appears to be a ramp only on the one end...
949CEF97-EEF5-4D9E-9D3B-C027DD061E14.jpeg
0CB7898F-2289-4FFB-BB53-8D61B2DB2DC5.jpeg

I just love how ramshackle it all looks.
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,565
Is this anything to do with there being a boarded crossing rather than a footbridge to cross the line?
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,786
Location
Devon
Is this anything to do with there being a boarded crossing rather than a footbridge to cross the line?
I’m not sure. This is the view facing the opposite way with the level crossing.
467CB8AC-C417-43AD-9CC5-B98E11394944.jpeg
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,565
The reason I ask is that there's been a lot of work done recently on current stations to remove the ramps.

I'm sure that I've heard something saying that it was being done to remove the opportunity for people to get onto the track easily.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,051
Location
Airedale
The reason I ask is that there's been a lot of work done recently on current stations to remove the ramps.

I'm sure that I've heard something saying that it was being done to remove the opportunity for people to get onto the track easily.
Yes, policy has changed - without unlocked slam doors, the safety issue is now people on the platform, hence the prevalence of gates, "cattle grids" etc.
 

4069

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2016
Messages
91
There's no actual removal of ramps, just that now when platforms are extended, the extension does not include a ramp.

Ramps are seen as facilitating trespass, and therefore to be fenced off as far as possible, and not forming part of new work.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,516
Location
GWR land
Apologies for such a late response to this thread, but I thought I could add that yes, it was pretty common for GWR halts to be in the style as pictured in the first post - stations on the Kingham - Banbury section of the Banbury & Cheltenham Direct Railway are good examples.
If you're interested in more examples, all with their own little quirks, I'd recommend a Google. Stations of note to this topic are Rollright Halt, Sarsden Halt, and Milton Halt.

Hope this helps,

-Peter :)
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,786
Location
Devon
Apologies for such a late response to this thread, but I thought I could add that yes, it was pretty common for GWR halts to be in the style as pictured in the first post - stations on the Kingham - Banbury section of the Banbury & Cheltenham Direct Railway are good examples.
If you're interested in more examples, all with their own little quirks, I'd recommend a Google. Stations of note to this topic are Rollright Halt, Sarsden Halt, and Milton Halt.

Hope this helps,

-Peter :)
I was trying to get a few ideas for a friend really and it all helped.
He came up with this arrangement to fit into a small space in the end of the scenic part of his 0 gauge project, it’s still work in progress but I like what he’s done with it.

4EED59A9-1297-41E1-B609-B0F554495496.jpegADAAC8F2-8A78-41E5-895C-92C80CDDBD05.jpeg

The railway will pass under an aqueduct at the end of the platform.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,089
It would be a nuisance for the p.w./anyone else walking along the ballast and wanting to get up on the platform.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,516
Location
GWR land
I was trying to get a few ideas for a friend really and it all helped.
He came up with this arrangement to fit into a small space in the end of the scenic part of his 0 gauge project, it’s still work in progress but I like what he’s done with it.

View attachment 79782View attachment 79783

The railway will pass under an aqueduct at the end of the platform.
That does look really good - it does have that little countryside branchline feel to it.

-Peter :)
 

Bedpan

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
1,287
Location
Harpenden
I always thought it was so that porters could wheel trolleys from one platform to another - down the ramp, across the boarded crossing and up the ramp on the other side. Of course, this explanation makes no sense in the case of stations with only one platform and step free access outside, but the ramps were used in this way at stations in the area where I grew up. There was also a boarded crossing half way down the platforms, with a step sunk into the platform wall, so that staff could easily get from one platform to another to collect tickets. perhaps oddly ( in hindsight) I never saw any members of the public break the rules and use ether boarded crossing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top