• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ORR P-Code data releases.

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,669
I will just say that if your work performance rating depends to a large extent on your department's performance figures, you will do everything (legally) possible to make those figures look as good as possible.....
Say no more. Understood.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jayah

On Moderation
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
1,889
I'm sure a planner can tell me the exact distinction, but seeing as "MTP" doesn't exist, and its more than just a week it's neither here nor there. Also, there is still - as I said above - a lot to consider when trying to standardise an "emergency timetable".

That's because P-coding is being misused from its original purpose. Trains should just appear "cancelled" based on the LTP (long term plan) timetable.
On the contrary, somebody is trying to build a new timetable every single day, a few hours before the event.

It should be done once, and last for 4 weeks plus. It has been done before, for similar reasons, many times.
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,251
Location
York
Periodic (4-weekly) statistics on resource availability shortage pre-cancellations (i.e. changes to train services caused by non-availability of staff or rolling stock) that are included in a revised timetable, and therefore may not be appearing in operators’ cancellations scores.

Operators have been providing ORR with the number of resource availability shortage “P*-coded” pre-cancellations since railway period 11 (8 January 2023 to 4 February 2023). The factsheet and data table present data for both on the day cancellations and resource availability shortage “P*-coded” pre-cancellations by cause for each operator.

For information on any revisions, please see our Revisions log.

Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR).

If you have any questions or feedback on these statistics, please contact [email protected]

More passenger rail performance data on punctuality, reliability and causes of delay are available on our passenger rail performance page.

Latest factsheet
Passenger rail performance: Cancellations data factsheet, rail period 10 (10 December 2023 to 6 January 2024)
Passenger rail performance: Cancellations data factsheet, rail period 10 (10 December 2023 to 6 January 2024)
Date published: 26 Jan 2024
Date next published: 23 Feb 2024

Key results
Ten operators recorded resource availability shortage “P*-coded” pre-cancellations in rail period 10. Of these, nine were due to the operator having resource availability shortage, and one was due to both operator and Network Rail resource availability shortage (TfW Rail).

Looking through the data, one can really see how staff shortages are impacting Northern in particular (but also TPE and LNER among others). I traveled with LNER during this period and had a delay of over three hours due to disruption caused by Storm Pia, my train was originally P-Coded and then reinstated, but LNER cancelled multiple services due to this disruption, infrastructure failures have definitely contributed to LNER's figures.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,244
Location
West Wiltshire

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,300
The last few days have been affected by driver overtime bans on Northern and TPE. There is a huge contrast to the similar situation of overtime ban in Dec 23:
  • Northern have reduced P-code cancellations from 150+ per day to around 40. Obviously promising progress, although less leave/holiday in January may be responsible. In fact some Northern services have been due to no guard rather than lack of drivers.
  • Although TPE reduced their service in Dec 23, again there has not been a 20% cancellation meltdown that was typical only 6 months ago.
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,251
Location
York

Key results​

  • Nine operators recorded resource availability shortage “P*-coded” pre-cancellations. Of these, eight were due to the operator having resource availability shortage and one was due to both operator and Network Rail resource availability shortage (TfW Rail).
  • Twenty-three out of 24 train operators reported their number of “P*-coded” pre-cancellations in period 12 to ORR. Caledonian Sleeper did not submit data.

LNER had the most P-Coded services, due to staff shortages and infrastructure failures, TPE saw lower % of cancellations than Northern
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,244
Location
West Wiltshire

LNER had the most P-Coded services, due to staff shortages and infrastructure failures, TPE saw lower % of cancellations than Northern
Doesn't it say LNER was 244 trains P-coded (and 14 part canx) due to lack of rolling stock, rather than due to infrastructure. 36 were due to lack of staff.

However it splits 1 in 10 trains cancelled is bad, and 3 times the national average

 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,577
Doesn't it say LNER was 244 trains P-coded (and 14 part canx) due to lack of rolling stock, rather than due to infrastructure. 36 were due to lack of staff.

However it splits 1 in 10 trains cancelled is bad, and 3 times the national average

LNER not helped by the Hitachi strike, which for several weeks resulted in multiple cancellations due to shortage of available stock.
 

DJP78

On Moderation
Joined
26 Nov 2019
Messages
157
Location
Bristol
There is one overriding reason why train cancellations are P-coded; It improves the performance figures!
Nail on the head

Whatever the reasons for P-coding, clearly the operators are deliberately P-coding to manipulate their performance figures

They, the regulators and gov all benefit with artificially enhanced reliability figures

Unfortunately, this isn’t addressing chronic underinvestment and isn’t addressing the reasons behind train cancellations

Smacks of A&E parking ambulances outside to stop the clock ticking on patient admissions

I despair of this country at times
 

TrainBoy98

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
446
Location
Worthing
Nail on the head

Whatever the reasons for P-coding, clearly the operators are deliberately P-coding to manipulate their performance figures

They, the regulators and gov all benefit with artificially enhanced reliability figures

Unfortunately, this isn’t addressing chronic underinvestment and isn’t addressing the reasons behind train cancellations

Smacks of A&E parking ambulances outside to stop the clock ticking on patient admissions

I despair of this country at times
So long as the figure show "progress" that's all that matters! Reality doesn't come into it :rolleyes:
 

Confused52

Member
Joined
5 Aug 2018
Messages
258
The National Rail site says "The Published Timetable of the Day will be available no later than 22:00 on the day before the changes happen."

So what would be the response if I asked for a copy of the "Published timetable"? I have no confidence that such a document actually exists. It is not available to download from National Rail!
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,251
Location
York
  • In period 13, eight operators recorded resource availability shortage “P*-coded” pre-cancellations. Of these, seven were due to the operator having resource availability shortage and one was due to both operator and Network Rail resource availability shortage (TfW Rail).

Staff shortages make up a huge brunt of the P-Coded services, Northern P-Coded 599 services due to lack of available staff, LNER P-Coded 31 due to the same reason and 31 at TPE for the same reason. GC tops the list of P-Coded services once again. Avanti's P-Coded services have come down as well.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,244
Location
West Wiltshire
Latest P-code cancellations have been published 19th April

There is also a table 3, a split by operator of cancellations for year (Apr 2023 - Mar 2024) including P-code
From best to worst :

C2C 1.4%
Anglia 1.6%
SouthEastern 2.1%
Hull trains 2.4%
Chiltern & Scotrail, both 2.5%
London Overground & Lumo, both 3.0%
Merseyrail 3.2%
SouthWest 3.4%
East Midlands, Heathrow Express, Caledonian sleeper, all 3.6%
Elizabeth line 4.1%
Thameslink and West Midlands, both 4.5%
Great Western 4.7%
Transport for Wales 6.1%
Avanti West Coast 6.9%
LNER 7.1%
Northern 7.2%
Cross Country 8.4%
TransPennine Express 10.8%
Grand Central 12.4%


 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,654
To be fair, it shows a general improvement.
Maybe so.....but still grim. TPE and Northern cancelling 100s of services a week. Obviously the right thing to do in letting the passengers know as soon as possible, but still......

Not really an advert for encouraging pax to ditch the car
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,583
Location
London
Bear in mind most operators will have legitimate reasons to P-code a small % of trains, especially when disruption spans multiple days. This can be seen in the stats, but the whole reason the ORR even looked into it and report on it now was the gross manipulation of it by certain TOCs.

The numbers in @Snow1964 are the adjusted cancelletion rates (I.e. including P-codes) and for some operators, there’s none to report, so no difference (e.g. Southeastern, CrossCountry, Elizabeth line)
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,244
Location
West Wiltshire
To be fair, it shows a general improvement.
.... from a dreadful start position.

But if some operators can manage to run over 98% of their services, why are a select few so useless at running trains to a published timetable, when they had input in formulating the timetable, or it has hardly changed in a decade. It's not new unproven timetables
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,654
.... from a dreadful start position.

But if some operators can manage to run over 98% of their services, why are a select few so useless at running trains to a published timetable, when they had input in formulating the timetable, or it has hardly changed in a decade. It's not new unproven timetables
Staffing issues......which has been done to death on here. Until the general climate of industrial relationships improve dramatically, then this will continue until further notice. It's that simple.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,395
Location
Bolton
Bear in mind most operators will have legitimate reasons to P-code a small % of trains, especially when disruption spans multiple days.
Indeed. Most reasons that would be known about in advance other than shortage of trains or train crew would be legitimate. But the ORR isn't reporting those in their adjustments so I'm not sure it's really relevant here?
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,244
Location
West Wiltshire
Staffing issues......which has been done to death on here. Until the general climate of industrial relationships improve dramatically, then this will continue until further notice. It's that simple.
General Climate, that is a new excuse for cancellations

As for staff issues that is HR and Leadership failings
 
Last edited:

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,395
Location
Bolton
The numbers in @Snow1964 are the adjusted cancelletion rates (I.e. including P-codes) and for some operators, there’s none to report, so no difference (e.g. Southeastern, CrossCountry, Elizabeth line)
They're still p-coding trains of course. Just only doing it legitimately. The rest are trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,654
General Climate, that is a new excuse for cancellations

As for staff quality that is HR and Leadership fai
Where did I mention staff quality?

And in case you haven't noticed, there has been some significant industrial relations issues all over the UK rail network for a good while now.....shows no sign of abating either. I suspect we will still be having these well into 2025 or beyond
 

Msq71423

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
54
Location
North West
The figures quoted above in post 44 are year to date for the full year. Looking at the period 13 figures alone though we have

AWC 6.6% (annual figure 6.9%)
LNER 5.3% (7.1%)
Northern 4.1% (7.2%)
TPE 2.8% (10.8%)
TfW 2.7% (6.1%)
Hull Trains 1.9% (2.4%)
Lumo 1.7% (3%)
Scotrail 1.4% (2.5%)

So significant improvements all round, particularly for TPE in P13 compared to the annual average figure.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,671
Location
Wales
Comparing period figures to the annual ones may be misleading. It may be the case that things are indeed improving, but it may also be the case that seasonal variations (leaf fall or winter weather for example) result in routinely poorer performance at certain times of year. The best way to compare is to compare equivalent periods from different years.
 

Top