CockneySparrow
Member
I've just checked (three sources), and the NVR is accessible only from the Down Slow at Fletton. There's no access to the Down Slow from the low-numbered platforms (anything east of the Down Fast) at the south end of Peterborough station, so I stand by my (correct) statement that there's no physical route to the NVR from platform 1.
Even if a physical route was available: just because a route isn't planned to 100% of its capacity, it doesn't necessarily follow that a path is available to cross four running lines and foul the overlap at the end of one of the Up platforms. Edwin's suggestion of using one of the higher-numbered through platforms is much more realistic anyway, so can we finally conclude that there was indeed little justification for retaining the old platform 1?
In the absence (for now) of a grade-separated junction at Werrington, it'd introduce unnecessary movements crossing the ECML, for starters. Given that EMT (or whoever ends up operating Lincs local services) are unlikely to end up operating a Wisbech service (would be very difficult to resource), it'd require co-operation between two TOCs. Would the timings work? Unlikely, I suspect, if sensible connections into and out of ECML services were to be provided on both routes. If the main demand from Wisbech is towards Cambridge, what (other than making it very difficult to get to Cambridge) would it achieve anyway?
Thanks for the info, so in fact FCC have had to use the fast lines then over the years, makes you wonder what is the logic