Even if you were allowed to do it (which I'm sure you're not), how would you explain to the unwitting punter who tries to buy a ticket from Newark to Peterborough that you're selling them a ticket from Metheringham to Stamford* to cover their journey? There's a fair possibility that they will never have heard of Metheringham and won't know that getting to Stamford by train involves going via Peterborough!As @Gaelan has pointed out... I don't think an accredited retailer would be permitted to do this?
Yes, quite. It's difficult enough explaining why TrainSplit sells some of the tickets it does (or applies/doesn't apply some of the discounts it does/doesn't!)Even if you were allowed to do it (which I'm sure you're not), how would you explain to the unwitting punter who tries to buy a ticket from Newark to Peterborough that you're selling them a ticket from Metheringham to Stamford* to cover their journey? There's a fair possibility that they will never of heard of Metheringham and won't know that getting to Stamford by train involves going via Peterborough!
*Just a random set of stations that, some years ago, did provide such a loophole.
Even for a customr who is happy to travel according to the itinerary, there's the problem that, as far as I know, there isn't a web site which can reliably validate an itinerary for the sort of complicated journey this proposal may involve.
With regard to it being niche, though, everything is niche until the Trainline starts doing it.
Not publicly available; if they were, the results would be useless almost immediately, as the prices of the cheaper fares would either go up, or you'd see 'negative easements' introduced.Er, said it all in the title really....
There are, in fact, sites selling “skiplagged” flight tickets, consisting of A-B via C when the customer intends to travel A-C. Airlines take a very dim view of it, apparently - which makes it surprising they get away with selling tickets that way!any more than you are going to see journeys such as Dublin to New York via London offered in place of London to New York
.... and then said punter, fearing that they have been ripped off, contacts the TOC.... bye bye loophole fare....Even if you were allowed to do it (which I'm sure you're not), how would you explain to the unwitting punter who tries to buy a ticket from Newark to Peterborough that you're selling them a ticket from Metheringham to Stamford* to cover their journey? There's a fair possibility that they will never have heard of Metheringham and won't know that getting to Stamford by train involves going via Peterborough!
*Just a random set of stations that, some years ago, did provide such a loophole.
I have certainly spent hours and I enjoy doing it.Yeah I find usually it comes down to spending a bit of time with brfares and the routeing guide to try and find some fares that are permitted by certain routes that they probably shouldn't be, and therefore undercut the normal fares on that route - often it involves looking for fares set by different TOCs as well. However, this can take hours of research for savings along the lines of a few pounds, which unless you are going to really enjoy doing this, it isn't worth it for most. And as mentioned, people aren't going to bring up their tickets that they've found, since when made public, there's a good chance that the fare will be changed to get rid of the loophole.
I recently found a ticket from the Oxford area to the South Wales area which is valid via London in the routeing guide but not via Reading, and it brought up a super weird anomoly where you couldn't use the ticket to travel Oxford - Reading - South Wales, but you could use it to do Oxford - London Paddington - South Wales (national rail enquires gave me an itinerary doing this route). The ticket had the 8A no break of journey permitted restriction code on it, so you couldn't just break your journey at Reading.
It may be an error on the part of NRE or a misapplied easement; you'd likely not get through the barriers at Paddington with such a ticket.I recently found a ticket from the Oxford area to the South Wales area which is valid via London in the routeing guide but not via Reading, and it brought up a super weird anomoly where you couldn't use the ticket to travel Oxford - Reading - South Wales, but you could use it to do Oxford - London Paddington - South Wales (national rail enquires gave me an itinerary doing this route). The ticket had the 8A no break of journey permitted restriction code on it, so you couldn't just break your journey at Reading.
Yeah for sure the staff at Paddington would give you a really odd look too, but since you can get an itinerary for it, they would have to allow it I guess.It may be an error on the part of NRE or a misapplied easement; you'd likely not get through the barriers at Paddington with such a ticket.
I've been made aware of numerous instances of Paddington gateline refusing to allow tickets being used in conjunction with a valid itinerary.Yeah for sure the staff at Paddington would give you a really odd look too, but since you can get an itinerary for it, they would have to allow it I guess.
Yep, which is exactly what happened with the Diss to Cuffley ticket I used to use. Now only valid "via Cambridge".Not publicly available; if they were, the results would be useless almost immediately, as the prices of the cheaper fares would either go up, or you'd see 'negative easements' introduced.
Isn't it arguably anti-competitive if the accreditation rules prevent perfectly valid tickets being offered?Needless to say, if you intend on doing this note that it's only valid to do so on tickets without a "break of journey" restriction, which excludes all advances.
My understanding is that the ticketing accreditation rules prohibit a ticket retailer from offering such tickets. In principle a third party could offer a search tool using the publicly available fares data, but as @Kite159 notes people tend to get (justifiably) annoyed when their local fare irregularity gets too publicized and fixed.
We're talking going well beyond that!Isn't it arguably anti-competitive if the accreditation rules prevent perfectly valid tickets being offered?
Honestly, you're quite likely to not get through the barriers at Paddington even with a perfectly valid ticket either!you'd likely not get through the barriers at Paddington with such a ticket
Once you get to Paddington, how do you get to South Wales without passing through Reading?Yeah I find usually it comes down to spending a bit of time with brfares and the routeing guide to try and find some fares that are permitted by certain routes that they probably shouldn't be, and therefore undercut the normal fares on that route - often it involves looking for fares set by different TOCs as well. However, this can take hours of research for savings along the lines of a few pounds, which unless you are going to really enjoy doing this, it isn't worth it for most. And as mentioned, people aren't going to bring up their tickets that they've found, since when made public, there's a good chance that the fare will be changed to get rid of the loophole.
I recently found a ticket from the Oxford area to the South Wales area which is valid via London in the routeing guide but not via Reading, and it brought up a super weird anomoly where you couldn't use the ticket to travel Oxford - Reading - South Wales, but you could use it to do Oxford - London Paddington - South Wales (national rail enquires gave me an itinerary doing this route). The ticket had the 8A no break of journey permitted restriction code on it, so you couldn't just break your journey at Reading.