• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Potential use for Class 769 FLEX

Which company would you think need Bi-Modes?

  • South Western Railway

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • West Midlands Railway

    Votes: 10 41.7%
  • Others

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.

Stephen Lee

On Moderation
Joined
7 Jul 2019
Messages
680
I wondered apart from Transport For Wales/GWR/Northern/ROG which company can consider for Class 769s.......
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
There's a difference between "needs bi-modes" and "needs 769s". Arguably any sort of service operating with a moderate distance under the wires should go over to some sort of bi-modes but in many cases (particularly SWR & WMR) they should be new build IMO, or at the very least of a much higher quality than a 769 could be.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,969
Where is the option for razer blades? 769s aren't the only option for bimode commuter trains, Bombardier offer a bimode aventra, Stadler flirts are an option, CAF offer bimode civitys and all of them are far better than the 769.
 
Last edited:

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,166
Location
Dunblane
Where is the option for razer blades? 769s aren't the only option for bimode commuter trains, Bombardier offer a bimode aventra, Stadler flirts are an option, CAF offer bimode civitys and all of them are far better than the 769.
Of course, but 769s, like the 230s are much cheaper. Whether that niche has worked is up to debate.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,969
Of course, but 769s, like the 230s are much cheaper. Whether that niche has worked is up to debate.
Ofcourse but the 230s are refurbished a lot better, the routes which need cheaper stock would be fine with 230s. The routes suggested on this thread would be able to get new stock.
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,166
Location
Dunblane
Ofcourse but the 230s are refurbished a lot better, the routes which need cheaper stock would be fine with 230s. The routes suggested on this thread would be able to get new stock.
I agree, there aren't many routes at all that would be suited to 769s were they haven't already been considered. 230s are probably held back by their top speed which is just too slow for anything but a backwater branchline as well as being the victim of bad timing within the famine and feast approach to commissioning new rolling stock in this country (same probably applies to 769s)
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,824
Location
Taunton or Kent
SWR could utilise bi-modes very well, but I wouldn't choose 769s. A new build with 3rd rail + diesel/alternative fuel would be better, or in a better dream world (as very unlikely in near future), OHLE electrify the WEML and Romsey centred lines and have dual voltage electrics.
 

Mitchell Hurd

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
1,703
I'm not sure if this is the right thread for what I'm putting but if it was me, I'd transfer some of the 769's from TfW to GWR when TfW have finished with them and use them on the remaining routes through the Thames Valley services that are Turbo-worked and run through, to and from Didcot Parkway. It would mean everything out of London Paddington except the sleepers is electric.

It would mean more Turbos for Bristol and spare Turbos for special event days.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,878
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'm not sure if this is the right thread for what I'm putting but if it was me, I'd transfer some of the 769's from TfW to GWR when TfW have finished with them and use them on the remaining routes through the Thames Valley services that are Turbo-worked and run through, to and from Didcot Parkway. It would mean everything out of London Paddington except the sleepers is electric.

It would mean more Turbos for Bristol and spare Turbos for special event days.

A use for them for GWR would be that the Oxford stopper could revert to being a through service to Paddington.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,278
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Also on GWR since the Severn Tunnel is still a diesel island for a while then they could use them for events in Cardiff for which the use of 379's were planned to be used on.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
Also on GWR since the Severn Tunnel is still a diesel island for a while then they could use them for events in Cardiff for which the use of 379's were planned to be used on.

All restrictions are removed in a couple of weeks based on the latest in the GW Electrification thread. They've already got the signage up for the 387s in Cardiff, so they're clearly expecting it to be available shortly, definitely before any 769s will enter service!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,310
A use for them for GWR would be that the Oxford stopper could revert to being a through service to Paddington.

I'm not sure they would want to consider that at all. The loss of performance relative to 387s and 345s east of Reading would destroy the timetable.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,969
I'm not sure they would want to consider that at all. The loss of performance relative to 387s and 345s east of Reading would destroy the timetable.
aren't 319s not great after 90 mph? Well they aren't that good in comparison bellow 90mph anyway and the extra weight from the 769 conversion would make it worse.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,310
I'm not sure if this is the right thread for what I'm putting but if it was me, I'd transfer some of the 769's from TfW to GWR when TfW have finished with them and use them on the remaining routes through the Thames Valley services that are Turbo-worked and run through, to and from Didcot Parkway. It would mean everything out of London Paddington except the sleepers is electric.

It would mean more Turbos for Bristol and spare Turbos for special event days.

There essentially aren't any such Turbo services out of Paddington now. A 769 can't work to Greenford and all trains to Didcot are 387s. Once the GWR 769s arrive there are only nine 2-car Turbo workings at Reading. One for Greenford, Marlow, Windsor, peak and evening Newbury to Bedwyn shuttles and the ones working around Oxford. I guess that the reason GWR had an option for a slightly larger fleet in the first place (23 instead of 19) was to allow their use around Oxford but that never would have involved running (in service) east of Reading.
 
Last edited:

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,645
Location
York
For Northern, I don’t see why they wouldn’t put 769s on the Manchester Airport to Windermere/Barrow services instead of the 195s they now use on it.
 

TheWalrus

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2008
Messages
2,038
Location
UK
A use for them for GWR would be that the Oxford stopper could revert to being a through service to Paddington.
What would be the benefit of that? Passengers from Radley and Culham would be able to change at Didcot for much faster services to Reading and London. Personally I would like to see them extended to Cardiff 1tph but that’s just a personal aspiration!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,310
People like direct services?

GWR run through stopping services from Oxford to Reading in the peak - that is pretty much as far as anyone needs a direct service from Radley, Culham or Appleford given the time difference between sitting on one train all the way to Paddington and changing at Didcot or Reading.

The splitting of services at Didcot has been a 'blessing in disguise' for the structure of these services.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,867
They could swap the seats. I would agree this route is ideal for bi-modes, though it'll be interesting to see if the battery 331s will have enough capacity to run this in which case they would be better.
Given the time taken to deliver the 769s, Northern would have been better off binning the 769 idea and getting a few more 4-car 755s á la Anglia. Possibly 4-car but with only 2 engines as they only need match Sprinter performance on the diesel bits.

Yes, it's another fleet type, but the 769s will be non-standard too once the extra 323s arrive. We'd then get to compare the CAF and Stadler products directly - I know where my money would be for the higher quality.
 

TheWalrus

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2008
Messages
2,038
Location
UK
GWR run through stopping services from Oxford to Reading in the peak - that is pretty much as far as anyone needs a direct service from Radley, Culham or Appleford given the time difference between sitting on one train all the way to Paddington and changing at Didcot or Reading.

The splitting of services at Didcot has been a 'blessing in disguise' for the structure of these services.
Also I’m sure they had longer layovers at Didcot when they were through workings?
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,358
Seeing as we’re being speculative, SWR could use them for a new semi fast service from Portsmouth to Salisbury, and at the same time change the rocket 6 services back to starting and finishing at Totton. I can’t think of any actual benefits of running it as a ‘6’, although I’m sure it’s obvious once pointed out, unless it’s to provide a direct fast service from Millbrook and Redbridge to Romsey and Salisbury and avoid the slog via Chandlers ford.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top