• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Poulton-Fleetwood reopening - more details announced.

Status
Not open for further replies.

CAF397

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2020
Messages
493
Location
Lancashire
In a letter to Mr Maynard, Rail Minister Huw Merriman has set out for the first time how the Government intends to restore the rail link.

New details have been released about how the Poulton to Fleetwood line will be reopened, and what trains will likely operate.

In his letter to Mr Maynard the Minister said: “The early work has indicated that a tram-train is likely to be the best performing option, helping to maximise connectivity along the Wyre peninsula.

“Services would operate twice hourly from Preston station to Poulton-le-Fylde over the existing heavy rail network, before joining a new light rail link between Poulton-le-Fylde and the Denham Way roundabout on Amounderness Way, calling at up to three new intermediate stops.

 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
1,680
Don't hold your breath. Has Red Wall fudge written all over it.
 
Last edited:

AntoniC

Member
Joined
28 Dec 2011
Messages
871
Location
Southport
New details have been released about how the Poulton to Fleetwood line will be reopened, and what trains will likely operate.





Is there a General Election soon ?

What happens if the Tories lose their Red Wall seats - does this mean the proposed plan will die ?
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,855
Connecting into the existing tram line for the run into Fleetwood makes a lot more sense than running a separate line into Fleetwood.

“Services would operate twice hourly from Preston station to Poulton-le-Fylde over the existing heavy rail network, before joining a new light rail link between Poulton-le-Fylde and the Denham Way roundabout on Amounderness Way, calling at up to three new intermediate stops.

“From there, the services would continue on the existing Blackpool tram network towards Fleetwood town centre and Fleetwood ferry terminal.”
 
Last edited:

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,081
Location
Airedale
What's the current linespeed Preston-Poulton, and how would 50mph(?) tram-trains fit with that? I foresee a pure tram ending at Poulton.

(Though if it is workable, the next step would logically be to convert Blackpool S/Squires Gate-Preston.)
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,985
What's the current linespeed Preston-Poulton, and how would 50mph(?) tram-trains fit with that? I foresee a pure tram ending at Poulton.

(Though if it is workable, the next step would logically be to convert Blackpool S/Squires Gate-Preston.)
70 and 75 max.
 

Some guy

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2022
Messages
402
Location
Preston
The Blackpool tram or the tram/train operator they are thinking of operating all the way to Preston via fleetwood will be absolutely brilliant and provide direct services to the ferry terminal
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,144
The Blackpool tram or the tram/train operator they are thinking of operating all the way to Preston via fleetwood will be absolutely brilliant and provide direct services to the ferry terminal
what use is that when there's no passenger ferries from Fleetwood?
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
No money allocated to the announcement as far as I can see in the article.

Secondly is there actually space at Preston for 2tph extra?
And thirdly how are tram trains distinguished such that when they leave Preston they head to Fleetwood and not Blackpool North / South and secondly in reverse from Fleetwood direction only tram train joins at Poulton and not just an ordinary tram? (Perhaps Sheefield is a better real world example but hopefully you get my drift?)
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,985
No money allocated to the announcement as far as I can see in the article.

Secondly is there actually space at Preston for 2tph extra?
And thirdly how are tram trains distinguished such that when they leave Preston they head to Fleetwood and not Blackpool North / South and secondly in reverse from Fleetwood direction only tram train joins at Poulton and not just an ordinary tram? (Perhaps Sheefield is a better real world example but hopefully you get my drift?)
You give them specific headcode letters or numbers, run them as 9xxx like we do elsewhere to distinguish a specific routing. As for not routing a tram onto the network, the same way as a driver when they get offered a wrong route, or you put in a bay at Poulton. By the time this ever happens Preston will likely be in the middle of a remodeling anyway.
 

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,321
Off-topic: Blackpool Gazette gets this week's award for the worst designed website to attempt to read an article on.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
You give them specific headcode letters or numbers, run them as 9xxx like we do elsewhere to distinguish a specific routing. As for not routing a tram onto the network, the same way as a driver when they get offered a wrong route, or you put in a bay at Poulton. By the time this ever happens Preston will likely be in the middle of a remodeling anyway.
I wasn't thinking in the signalling sense of different headcodes as trains can have wrong headcodes attached and drivers can make mistakes. I was thinking of something like on the Underground where there is detection between a tube train and a sub-surface one where something is smashed (apparently) and stops District Line trains entering the Piccadilly tunnels near Barons Court (for example).
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,985
I wasn't thinking in the signalling sense of different headcodes as trains can have wrong headcodes attached and drivers can make mistakes. I was thinking of something like on the Underground where there is detection between a tube train and a sub-surface one where something is smashed (apparently) and stops District Line trains entering the Piccadilly tunnels near Barons Court (for example).
It clearly cannot be an issue as it works ok on the DC lines with the Bakerloo, at Harrow and Queens Park where tube and heavy rail interact.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,707
Location
Mold, Clwyd
So are we looking at 600V DC/25kV AC dual voltage tram-trains, capable of running on the Blackpool tram network and NR to Preston?
That sounds awkwardly unique.
The mix between Poulton and Preston doesn't look efficient on an upgraded route (50mph tram-trains interworking with faster 331/390 services).
I suppose it could be a useful solution at Salwick, removing Northern calls.
You could also see the tram-trains runnng Blackpool North-Poulton-Fleetwood and picking up local stops.
Amusing that Huw Merriman is briefing Paul Maynard, a previous (and very capable) rail minister, MP for Blackpool North and Clevelys.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,713
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
I think it’s likely that 100kph/62mph tram trains would be ordered in the style of the TfW Class 398s.

Regarding the comments of this being a niche microfleet, if they’re implementing a tram-train solution for Fleetwood, they might as well do the same thing with the Blackpool South branch, with the route being linked with the existing Promenade tramway. Should the scheme succeed I can see a number of tram-train routes opening across the north of England.

I’d imagine that more terminating platforms would be required at Preston, although I’m not sure how that could be done.
 

kevjs

Member
Joined
4 Sep 2013
Messages
402
I think it’s likely that 100kph/62mph tram trains would be ordered in the style of the TfW Class 398s.

Regarding the comments of this being a niche microfleet, if they’re implementing a tram-train solution for Fleetwood, they might as well do the same thing with the Blackpool South branch, with the route being linked with the existing Promenade tramway. Should the scheme succeed I can see a number of tram-train routes opening across the north of England.

I’d imagine that more terminating platforms would be required at Preston, although I’m not sure how that could be done.
Aren't there three unused platforms (one through, one north facing bay, one south facing bay) at the western side of the station that could be brought into use with some modernisation? Or do the Royal Mail make extensive use of them again?
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,224
So are we looking at 600V DC/25kV AC dual voltage tram-trains, capable of running on the Blackpool tram network and NR to Preston?
That sounds awkwardly unique.
The mix between Poulton and Preston doesn't look efficient on an upgraded route (50mph tram-trains interworking with faster 331/390 services).
I suppose it could be a useful solution at Salwick, removing Northern calls.
You could also see the tram-trains runnng Blackpool North-Poulton-Fleetwood and picking up local stops.
Amusing that Huw Merriman is briefing Paul Maynard, a previous (and very capable) rail minister, MP for Blackpool North and Clevelys.

For comparison, the London Underground network is 630V four-rail, but is generally cross-compatible with 750V third rail. Some lines were boosted to 750V when the S-Stock came in. These are nominal voltages anyway, and trains need to be able to handle voltage drops when they are far from feeder sites. So, I don't think it's really that difficult to build a dual-voltage tram that can handle 600V. That's a standard voltage for upgraded Gen 1 tramways around the world and there will almost certainly be some tram-train projects on these, so the addressable market for a 600V-25kV certified system almost certainly isn't just limited to Blackpool.

The idea of taking over the Blackpool South line isn't new and I think it's worthwhile. If nothing else, handing passenger lines over from Network Rail to a local transport operator who can better integrate them with other local transport and developments is a good idea. Post-conversion a line like this would likely cost far less in operational subsidy than either today, or a future with more modern electrified heavy rail services. Spending money on stringing up 25kV to Blackpool South seems unlikely if a comparable investment could do so much more for the local area.
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
2,868
Location
Bristol
Yet more political posturing.
The realistic possibility is just to extend the trams down to a seperate platform at Poulton, but even that is a bit optimistic. :)
 

GardenRail

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2023
Messages
323
Location
Yorkshire
Interlocks with signalling. It works at Pelaw....

or Ealing Broadway.....
Yep. On the Sheffield System, we have what are known as VIS Loops. They stop mainline signals clearing on to tram infrastructure for anything other than a tramtrain. They are located at Tinsley East and Parkgste.
 

GrimsbyPacer

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2014
Messages
2,256
Location
Grimsby
Will Preston, Poulton, Thornton, and the Fleetwood stops all have high platforms, like Metrolink?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top