Trainfan344
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 2,306
I'm nothing exciting really. Quite normal and bland. But I'm also unfit so a race would be no good for me. I'd probably lose.
I'm nothing exciting really. Quite normal and bland. But I'm also unfit so a race would be no good for me. I'd probably lose.
I'm largely orange with silver stripes.
Are you an Orangutan/Gorilla hybrid ?
I'd not have guessed! Having met you, I'd have just assumed you were 100% scouser!I have always identified as a mixed race person. A father from Limerick (R.O.I) and my mother is Liverpool born with one Black Barbadian parent and one English / Irish parent.
It's been interesting to see people listing their skin colours and nationalities, but it's worth pointing out that beyond these there's really no such thing, at least from a biological standpoint, as 'race' (citations:12). The only thing that race is is a concept and set of behaviours towards people of varying skin colours and from different parts of the world....
There's No Such Thing as Race... Or Is There?
We know that genetically, race does not exist; so why are we still using it in science?
Today we're going to take a deeper dive into one of the most popular themes in science in recent years: the recognition that genetically, there is no such thing as race. Nothing in our DNA identifies us as Caucasian, Mongoloid, or Negroid, or lends any support to the idea that any of those classifications might exist at all. No gene or combination of genes is unique to any race. Race, says today's common wisdom, is merely a "social construct" it is a way we look at each other, make a snap judgement based on some obvious traits, and apply a label. This seems like a simple enough resolution of the question, and is not especially controversial. So why, then, does the question persist?
I'd not have guessed! Having met you, I'd have just assumed you were 100% scouser!