• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should/will Windermere be wired as part of the 2026-2036 WCML rewire?

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,210
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Correct - another little known fact (albeit slightly off topic) is that Oxenholme Feeder Station, being originally destined for another location on West Coast where planning permission was refused, doesn't have the spare physical capacity to accommodate an extra Circuit Breaker necessary to feed the Windermere Branch.

All good points, but if the Windermere line is to every be wired, wouldn't it be the most cost effective way of doing it, to combine it the main WCML rewire?

Obviously depends on what Northern's new unit order is when it eventually emerges, but if it involves batteries it might genuinely not be necessary. It's not like freight or charters go down there, as there are no paths but the passenger ones unless you want to go in the middle of the night.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
1 Nov 2021
Messages
210
Location
Berwick
No, simply provide units battery for the off wire Windermere branch. It is time to look seriously at the cost of OLE and possibilities of using battery technology.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,819
Location
Greater Manchester
Currently a Windermere train comes from Manchester, runs back and forth a bit, then goes back to Manchester, and the batteries could probably hold enough for the 60-80 miles of those back and forth (+ a bit of time to charge at Oxenholme P3).

I don't know how fast batteries can be charged from the OLE at a standstill, but is there a risk of them running out of charge if 1 unit was required to go back and forth all day?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,210
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I don't know how fast batteries can be charged from the OLE at a standstill, but is there a risk of them running out of charge if 1 unit was required to go back and forth all day?

They don't do that, they come up, do 2-3 shuttles and go back. If they needed to do shuttles all day on rare occasions due to e.g. engineering works they could just send a DMU up instead.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,645
Location
York
Currently a Windermere train comes from Manchester, runs back and forth a bit, then goes back to Manchester, and the batteries could probably hold enough for the 60-80 miles of those back and forth (+ a bit of time to charge at Oxenholme P3).

I don't know how fast batteries can be charged from the OLE at a standstill, but is there a risk of them running out of charge if 1 unit was required to go back and forth all day?
I’m not sure of the answer here but does West Ealing tell us anything?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,412
Currently a Windermere train comes from Manchester, runs back and forth a bit, then goes back to Manchester, and the batteries could probably hold enough for the 60-80 miles of those back and forth (+ a bit of time to charge at Oxenholme P3).

I don't know how fast batteries can be charged from the OLE at a standstill, but is there a risk of them running out of charge if 1 unit was required to go back and forth all day?

If the batteries aren’t big enough to cooe with the diagrams, there’s two solutions:

1) more batteries
2) change the diagrams.

I can’t see any scenario where there would be OLE on the Windermere branch.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
9,476
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
If the batteries aren’t big enough to cope with the diagrams, there’s two solutions:

1) more batteries
2) change the diagrams.

I can’t see any scenario where there would be OLE on the Windermere branch.
Windermere screams at me for a 25kV OHLE/Battery hybrid -and I say that as an out and out OHLE enthusiast.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,034
Windermere screams at me for a 25kV OHLE/Battery hybrid -and I say that as an out and out OHLE enthusiast.
For God's sake, that's 2 technologies which BR hasn't managed to make work together yet, and it has been planned to death already.
There are no objections, it's a dead simple job, and the power is there just waiting for the trolley wire. JFDI.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,034
The 756s are in service now doing exactly that.
but how well? Wiki says
The Class 756 officially entered service on 18 November 2024, and for consecutive days,[10] after initially entering service on one previous day of 15 November 2024.[1]

It is expected that the Class 756 units will enter service on the Treherbert line over the coming months, and then move across to the Rhymney Line from late 2025 as the Class 398 tram-trains enter service.[11]
but RTT seems to say that all Treherbert trains today have been cl 150!
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,034
756116 has been running Merthyr Tydfil to Aberdare (via Cardiff) all day.
so it has! It still looks as though most trains have been old DMU's though. I think I'll leave it a month or two before investing the time for a long day out to have a ride on one.
edit: sod's law, if I had tried it today I would have found the 11.13 "was cancelled between Cardiff Central and Aberdare due to a problem with the train (M8)." One before was just cancelled, another was a 150
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,895
Location
Yorks
Yes, absolutely. Get it wired. Quick win.

Release a load of diesels for elsewhere.
 

Class 317

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2020
Messages
409
Location
Cotswolds
Yes, absolutely. Get it wired. Quick win.

Release a load of diesels for elsewhere.

The BCR of wiring Windermere must be very low given the low traffic levels.

An even quicker win would be to buy battery bi modes for Northern as part of their tender for new trains across their network.

The Windermere branch can then be converted to electric operations without having to spend the cost of wiring the branch freeing up this investment for more productive wiring elsewhere.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,895
Location
Yorks
The BCR of wiring Windermere must be very low given the low traffic levels.

An even quicker win would be to buy battery bi modes for Northern as part of their tender for new trains across their network.

The Windermere branch can then be converted to electric operations without having to spend the cost of wiring the branch freeing up this investment for more productive wiring elsewhere.

Decades of carting around unnecessary and expensive to maintain equipment, just to avoid electrifying the last few percent of a largely electrified route.

Such a policy is lunacy.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,034
The BCR of wiring Windermere must be very low given the low traffic levels.

An even quicker win would be to buy battery bi modes for Northern as part of their tender for new trains across their network.

The Windermere branch can then be converted to electric operations without having to spend the cost of wiring the branch freeing up this investment for more productive wiring elsewhere.
Low traffic levels? It's my usual way of getting into the lakes and back home and i've never found a quiet train.

And how long does it take to get new units into traffic? A cheap trolley wire the length of the branch would a) be quick to do and b) produce a return from day 1 as it can be worked by existing stock and crews. Low cost / Short lead time / short construction time / instant return is an enrepreneur's dream!
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,264
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Decades of carting around unnecessary and expensive to maintain equipment, just to avoid electrifying the last few percent of a largely electrified route.

Such a policy is lunacy.
Absolutely agree 100%, such a quick win and so much easier than fitting a load of batteries to the trains.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,264
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Low traffic levels? It's my usual way of getting into the lakes and back home and i've never found a quiet train.

And how long does it take to get new units into traffic? A cheap trolley wire the length of the branch would a) be quick to do and b) produce a return from day 1 as it can be worked by existing stock and crews. Low cost / Short lead time / short construction time / instant return is an enrepreneur's dream!
Agreed, it’s very busy and there are definitely not “low traffic levels”.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,885
Location
UK
Low traffic levels? It's my usual way of getting into the lakes and back home and i've never found a quiet train.

And how long does it take to get new units into traffic? A cheap trolley wire the length of the branch would a) be quick to do and b) produce a return from day 1 as it can be worked by existing stock and crews. Low cost / Short lead time / short construction time / instant return is an enrepreneur's dream!
It's only an hourly shuttle operated by a short DMU.
If the Thames Valley branches, which have higher traffic levels, didn't justify electrification then why does Windermere?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,210
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It's only an hourly shuttle operated by a short DMU.

Very often a long DMU now - 6.195 is basically the same as the 8-car 20m formations you usually get around London. And there are three through services to/from Manchester a day (those are the busiest). The days of it being a 2-car are long gone, unless Northern just can't manage anything else, and if that happens people will likely be left behind.

If the Thames Valley branches, which have higher traffic levels, didn't justify electrification then why does Windermere?

To be honest I think they do justify electrification. There shouldn't be any diesel operation in the South East at all, really - the islands of it are an operational hassle and give the wrong impression in pollution terms. The Marston Vale is another example (and I guess St Albans Abbey, which was done, is a similar example to Windermere).

Given that they were wiring sidings that were barely used as part of the original WCML electrification, the mind boggles as to why they didn't do it then.

For what it's worth, I suspect a through Pendolino service from Euston, out on a Friday evening around 6-7 and back on a Sunday afternoon around 3, to/from Euston, would easily sell out were it possible to do that. Though it's not a bad connection, it is very often held for short delays.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,819
Location
Greater Manchester
And how long does it take to get new units into traffic? A cheap trolley wire the length of the branch would a) be quick to do and b) produce a return from day 1 as it can be worked by existing stock and crews. Low cost / Short lead time / short construction time / instant return is an enrepreneur's dream!
You'd probably need new units to run the Windermere services, Northern in the North West is already short of EMUs.
 

Class 317

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2020
Messages
409
Location
Cotswolds
Decades of carting around unnecessary and expensive to maintain equipment, just to avoid electrifying the last few percent of a largely electrified route.

Such a policy is lunacy.
Battery bi modes are cheaper to maintain than DMU's and much lower fuel costs.

Don't forget the cost of maintaining the OHLE once installed which will be much higher than any slight increase in maintenance costs from having to maintain the batteries.

Don't forget that most battery trains are no heavier than the diesel alternatives.

Traffic levels are low in terms of TPH and also passenger capacity per hour.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,034
Battery bi modes are cheaper to maintain than DMU's and much lower fuel costs.
you don't need a battery at all if there are wires overhead - and there are lots of straight EMUs currently in use, reliable and fully proven.
Don't forget the cost of maintaining the OHLE once installed which will be much higher than any slight increase in maintenance costs from having to maintain the batteries.
the cost of maintaining a few miles of single trolley wire? (I think the proposal was that simple.)
Don't forget that most battery trains are no heavier than the diesel alternatives.
see my first line
Traffic levels are low in terms of TPH and also passenger capacity per hour.
... and this would be far too good for somewhere in the provinces? People who use the line don't think there is surplus capacity, and the National Park would love a major capacity/passenger environment improvement to encourage modal shift
 

Class 317

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2020
Messages
409
Location
Cotswolds
I think traffic density would not be high enough on the Thames Valley branches, NDL, Hastings to Ashford etc. It's not just in the provinces where BCR would be low.

Battery EMU's are proven overseas and are not a new technology.

Straight EMU's may be available but leasing costs are likely to be similar to battery bi modes so they won't save costs.

The cost of installing OHLE and maintaining it would be vastly more than adding a couple of additional Battery bi modes to Northerns coming order for new trains.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm not sure why people see batteries as a threat to electrification as they are electrification and indeed are likely to improve the BCR of future electrification schemes by bringing much wider benefits than from straight EMU'S alone.
 

stevieinselby

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
820
Location
Selby
You'd probably need new units to run the Windermere services, Northern in the North West is already short of EMUs.
Given the number of Sprinters that Northern has that will need to be replaced in the next few years, even if none of the EMUs currently in storage around the country are deemed to be any use then they will be getting new trains soon so there's no reason why that should be a barrier.
 

Top