Sad Sprinter
Established Member
Inspired by the recent thread on the Birmingham tunnel. Why did freight end on this corridor in the 70s? I’m guessing the fact it only really linked onto the Midland was apart of the problem?
Fewer and fewer economically viable flows which required its use? Sending freight right through the middle of a city on some of its busiest lines is surely to be avoided if at all possible. I know the lines immediately on either side were nothing like as busy as today - but the inner reaches of the Southern as a whole probably were.Inspired by the recent thread on the Birmingham tunnel. Why did freight end on this corridor in the 70s? I’m guessing the fact it only really linked onto the Midland was apart of the problem?
THere were weight limitations on Blackfriars Bridge (some one will know I am sure , plus some gauge constraints) - only 73's and 33's were allowed on engineering trains - and like the ex Moorgate branch the OLE had to be both isolated and earthed.Fewer and fewer economically viable flows which required its use? Sending freight right through the middle of a city on some of its busiest lines is surely to be avoided if at all possible. I know the lines immediately on either side were nothing like as busy as today - but the inner reaches of the Southern as a whole probably were.
In addition to the weight limitations on Blackfriars Bridge there was also a requirement for locos to be tripcock fitted for working on the Widened Lines.THere were weight limitations on Blackfriars Bridge
In addition to the weight limitations on Blackfriars Bridge there was also a requirement for locos to be tripcock fitted for working on the Widened Lines.
That would have been easy as there wasn’t any when freight was using the line.like the ex Moorgate branch the OLE had to be both isolated and earthed.
Even if they didn’t run on LUL metals?
No - but there was the very odd engineers train from time to time.......That would have been easy as there wasn’t any when freight was using the line.
and also from the GN/ECML main line; there were always more suburban passenger services through Farringdon from the GN lines than from the Midland. The Snow Hill banker was provided by the Eastern Region; it waited in a loco spur just beyond the end of the northbound platform at Farringdon, to push freight up the steep gradient onto Blackfriars. I believe that when dieselised a Class 08 shunter was used, so obviously a slow speed operation.Snow Hill also linked to East Anglia via Gospel Oak & Kentish Town. When the East London Line closed, freight which had used the ELL diverted via Snow Hill.
Suburban traffic to and from Moorgate did not use the Snow Hill tunnel.there were always more suburban passenger services through Farringdon from the GN lines than from the Midland.
Domestic coal is only a small part. Coal continued to be used after the late 1950s in electricity generation, town gas and many industries. House coal consumption continued with smokeless fuel.Coal traffic to London fell right away when the smokeless zone legislation came along in the late 1950s
It used the same northern approaches.Suburban traffic to and from Moorgate did not use the Snow Hill tunnel.
No, but the question was whether it was only connected to the Midland route, and the Widened Lines, from which the Snow Hill route branches, was connected and used more from the Great Northern than from the Midland.Suburban traffic to and from Moorgate did not use the Snow Hill tunnel.
Partly history, and partly the requirements of City (of London) Corporation.Why was the tunnel so steep?
I like to think that the LCDR did away with Ludgate Hill and began declining as soon as they crossed Blackfriars Bridge. They’d have to raise or bend Ludgate Hill but it would be a more gentle gradient. You could then build a ground level terminus under Smithfield.
The line had to be squeezed in among a dense city, either crossing over streets or under them. The lowest point was actually north of Farringdon, at Ray Street, where the Widened Lines pass under the Circle Line. This was long a troublesome flooding point after heavy rain as it is below the level of the Thames at high tide, and the last Metropolitan 4-4-0T tank loco was retained, equipped with a steam pump, to come and periodically deal with this. From Farringdon the line southwards continued under streets, then in a short section rose steeply to cross over Fleet Street, and then higher still for shipping clearance at the bridge over the Thames. Thameslink changed this to passing under rather than over Fleet Street, but still then needs a steep gradient up to Blackfriars and the bridge.Why was the tunnel so steep?
I like to think that the LCDR did away with Ludgate Hill and began declining as soon as they crossed Blackfriars Bridge. They’d have to raise or bend Ludgate Hill but it would be a more gentle gradient. You could then build a ground level terminus under Smithfield.
Which I had already pointed out here:No, but the question was whether it was only connected to the Midland route, and the Widened Lines, from which the Snow Hill route branches, was connected and used more from the Great Northern than from the Midland.
Parcels trains continued to run from/to the GN via the Widened Lines after 1966.Until 1966 there were large flows of coal via Ferme Park and then the Widened Lines to the Southern Region. By then the traffic was already in decline and, as part of the National Freight Plan, it was concentrated on the Midland route
There is a picture of the Ludgate Hill bridge here:The extension crossed Ludgate Hill.
The short version was Ludgate Hill was a processional route (the Lord Mayors procession used it every year in November) so gradients were restricted so horse drawn carriages can easily use it. When the bridge was removed (about 1990) Ludgate Circus was raised about half a metre to clear new line and limit the gradient (which is why the older buildings in the corners are lower).
Until 1990 this bridge carried the four lines from Blackfriars to Holborn Viaduct. Ludgate Hill station was around the corner to the right, though out of use by many years. The line is now below ground and extensively built over, so that this scene is much different today.
The line had to be squeezed in among a dense city, either crossing over streets or under them. The lowest point was actually north of Farringdon, at Ray Street, where the Widened Lines pass under the Circle Line. This was long a troublesome flooding point after heavy rain as it is below the level of the Thames at high tide, and the last Metropolitan 4-4-0T tank loco was retained, equipped with a steam pump, to come and periodically deal with this. From Farringdon the line southwards continued under streets, then in a short section rose steeply to cross over Fleet Street, and then higher still for shipping clearance at the bridge over the Thames. Thameslink changed this to passing under rather than over Fleet Street, but still then needs a steep gradient up to Blackfriars and the bridge.
John Betjeman in the 1950s persuaded a porter at Holborn Viaduct station to take him down through a side door to the abandoned Snow Hill platforms, which were beneath street level.