Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Was anything illegal in what they did?
-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
TfGM Bus franchising
- Thread starter Tim33160
- Start date
- Status
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
It's generally the case in contracts and conveyances and leases for land and property that a distinction is made between "fixtures" and "fittings". The default rule is if you can remove it without damaging the fabric or structure or a building, the old owner can keep it when they sell up. If it's bolted down or otherwise affixed in such a way it would leave a mess or holes or damage if removed, it has to stay with the building.
Same applied when you sell a house - unless the contract says otherwise. You can take a cooker, but not a built in oven; you can take a lightbulb but not a fireplace or radiator, etc. In commercial leases there's usually an intermediate category known as "plant" (which I'd expect a bus washer to be, but not a portable pressure washer). It would be separately negotiated whether plant would come with the building or not (often just for practical reasons - a new occupier may have their own kit and not want to dispose of the existing stuff).
But in reality it depends what the contracts say.
Goldfish62
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 11,675
No idea. I'm not a legal expert.
Won’t a lot of it be because Bolton was the main depot, Eccles was the small satellite depot
Now Eccles is the main (& only) depot so a lot of what Diamond North West only had at Bolton would need to be stripped out and moved to Eccles (or Preston)
Currently yes: but on the new contract they move to run out of Oldham - guess Oldham has space to accommodate the large number of buses need to run these routes?
Note the Bury routes 475 477 480 and 487 listed as running out of Queens Rd
Last edited:
daodao
Established Member
Surely area C's tender specifications in terms of routes needs to be revised in view of substantial subsequent alterations/withdrawals, particularly to subsidised services, including the award of routes 287, 288 and half of 280 to an external operator, Warrington Buses.
The Wythenshawe large zone includes nearly all the routes currently operated by Arriva (18 19 245 247 263 281 282 283/4 285/6); are they going to bid to retain these services and their existing depot?
Last edited:
Simon Dunn
New Member
Bus washes are like most equipment, they need to be maintained. Washing 200 buses every day 7 days per week requires regular repair and maintenance. Prior to exit, "Rotala" shared and agreed what was included and what wasn't included in the sale - this was agreed. Every Franchise operator is responsible for the procurement of the buildings contents. We offered the ability to acquire the contents, there was not dispute on ownership and this opportunity was not taken up. Items like industrial pressure washers cost £5,000.
Rotala has taken on the depot from Arriva in Bolton.
Rotala did more than what was legally, contractually and morally obliged to do. We looked to facilitate a smooth transition.
gka472l
Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 497
No, I believe Arriva are not bidding at all, which would mean (apart from the routes from Merseyside into Wigan) that Arriva are history in Greater Manchester.....
johncrossley
Established Member
Arriva are trying to exit the UK so franchising is really a gift for them.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
DB are trying to exit the UK (passenger operations, not heard of them wanting out of Schenker), but do they actually want to close Arriva down? Thought they wanted to flog it.
Signing a new XC National Rail Contract doesn't sound like a company trying to shut down.
johncrossley
Established Member
Yes they want to flog it but franchising basically means they can get rid of the assets very easily. It will be interesting if they decide to bid in the Liverpool City Region where they are currently dominant.
TheGrandWazoo
Veteran Member
No @johncrossley - Arriva aren't looking to exit the UK. Deutsche Bahn, the state owned operator and owner of Arriva, are looking to divest the Arriva business via a sale. As noted on the Arriva thread, a sale to I-Squared Capital is apparently well progressed.
The operations that they have in Manchester are/were fairly minimal and disparate. About 30 vehicles rattling about in Bolton and another 40 still there in Wythenshawe. In terms of assets, they didn't own Bolton depot (still owned by Roger Jarvis of Blue Bus heritage). Not certain that Wythenshawe isn't leased as well.
As for the fleet, someone may confirm but not certain that any of the Arriva fleet transferred with the Bee Network.
Franchising may mean that you can get rid of assets easily but you're unlikely to get the net book value (i.e. what it's listed for in the accounts) and just get a market value that is often not that fair.
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
With regards to the matters appertaing that occurred at the immediate start of the Bee Network and its bus services, the transport authority that was behind the launch of this project spent months disseminating publicity of the launch of the project, with associated commentary in social and press media that stated how the new system would be taking control of the bus operations and providing an "all dancing, all singing"" wonderful new transport system that would be far better for the bus travelling public than what had occurred when the private bus operators were in charge of bus service proivision.
They have had months to ensure the full realisation of their aspirations and it appears that no regard was given by them to the bus driver problems that could happen when large numbers of bus drivers just did not automatically TUPE across but either left the industry to become HGV drivers at a higher rate of pay (a situation that became prevalent in the post-Covid time) or those who did not want to leave their existing employer.
They have had months to ensure the full realisation of their aspirations and it appears that no regard was given by them to the bus driver problems that could happen when large numbers of bus drivers just did not automatically TUPE across but either left the industry to become HGV drivers at a higher rate of pay (a situation that became prevalent in the post-Covid time) or those who did not want to leave their existing employer.
No Arriva buses have moved to Bee Network
No Stagecoach buses based at Wigan depot moved to Bee Network
The new Stagecoach Schools Unit at Little Hulton is not yet operational with buses on these School duties travelling from Stagecoach Manchester depots out of service to Wigan and Bolton areas
Leyland Bus
Member
This forum isn't the place to go into the details of the last days of Rotala at Bolton but I will say that whilst what you wrote is 'broadly' correct in context, it isn't necessarily what happened in totality and your very last statement was most definitely not what occurred "on the ground" and we shall leave it at that.
so i take it the 184 is returning to Oldham depot
Seems strange to run them dead from Oldham, when Queens Road is about two min away from Rochdale Road.
And Middleton is on the routes!
978wta
Member
Seems odd to have 17+18 running out of Oldham, it’s miles off route compared to its current queens rd depot.
markymark2000
Established Member
We have to remember, TFGM are a new organisation with lots of new staff, give them time to learn the geography of their operating area first. Oh no, my mistake, they have been around for donkeys years and full of supposed professionals being paid big money and they can't even work out basic things like what is an ideal depot to run a route. This is exactly why it should have been done as route by route franchising, not by depot as evidently, by depot we have stupid people making stupid decision with zero accountability because Burnham won't have a bad word said about his beloved network.
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
He doesn't need to have bad words said by him, as the general bus travelling public are already saying them.
py_megapixel
Established Member
Are they though?
I've seen plenty of (anecdotal) evidence on this forum that the service is poor, but no evidence that it is substantially worse than before TfGM took over. Nor have I seen any suggestion that it won't improve as the teething issues are sorted out.
Manchester under deregulation was hardly a bastion of high-quality bus operation - if it had been, then there would have been no support for franchising in the first place.
Wouldn't route by route franchising end up with more routes run from less than ideal depots?
Leyland Bus
Member
Perhaps you should write to them and tell them you're perfect for the top job, you clearly can do the job better than them and know you're onions...
the first part of the network is barely a month old and it's always the same rhetoric... Come back in 2026 and tell us what you think of it and if it's absolutely rubbish, then you'll have been right... Alot will happen between now and 2026, so may'be just wait and see eh?
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
I have been on Bolton bus station this week and spoke to a number of people at different parts there and three out of every four were not happy. One woman in her 50' who is a daily bus user complained that promises of a better bus service just had not happened and on her route, some scheduled buses were missing.
Did you travel by train in the early days of Virgin Trains? I did. It was terrible. Old carriages that were dirty and smelly. Constant delays - once took me seven hours to get from Manchester to London. Good luck ever finding a member of staff onboard. When things went to pot, they went into hiding. Privatisation! Promised so much and it was terrible! You could stand on any platform and four out of four people would tell you how bad it was!
Years later, the same story with the early days of London Overground.
You don't, can't fix decades of problems overnight. It's impossible. It takes time. Three out of four people at Bolton bus station can dream that the Bee Network will miraculously solve all problems overnight. Well sorry, it's pretty much impossible. And it wouldn't matter who was mayor. It wouldn't matter if TfGM completely replaced all their key staff with people from this forum. The situation would be the same.
The truth is it will take time. Sorry. That's just how it is.
markymark2000
Established Member
Not necessarily If every depot remained in the exact same place as now and with the exact same operators owning those depots, there is potential for some of that to happen however with a logical cap on the percentage of routes which can be ran by one operator, you would end up with changes to the depots possibly more of them, smaller ones, or run by new operators. It would be almost a dead cert to end up with the 18 run from flaming Oldham though in any case, or Brookhouse 10 run by Bolton (that would be an Eccles or Manchester Central depot).
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Not sure if the viewpoint on train travel by Virgin Trains is off topic on a thread title that discusses TfGM bus franchising.
At the age of 78, I experienced rail travel on non-compartment stock in the early 1950s on 6-a-side seating that absolutely did nothing for the legs of schoolboys of an early age in short trousers. I am sure that some of those carriages were of Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway vintage.
I mentioned it not to deliberately go off topic. I mentioned it because I felt it an relatable example of how change doesn't happen miraculously overnight.
There seems to be an expectation from some that change on the Bee Network can happen overnight. Examples from the history of public transport history says otherwise. I am sure there are similar bus examples.
We could not mention these examples from history for the sake of having a "pure" on topic thread. Maybe we should. But if we did we would basically have some people going "it takes time" and others going "Burnham is incompetent because change hasn't happened overnight". And where does that get us? Going round in circles until a moderator jumps in to stop it.
That's why I mentioned it. I will say no more about it
- Status