DynamicSpirit
Established Member
Yes, that was why it was added. I get the impression TfL sort of did this under duress as they don't get any revenue from Thameslink.
It makes me wonder if this is why they did a spectacularly bad job of adding it in to the map: either they deliberately did a bad job, so Thameslink looks meandering and slow therefore it doesn't poach people off TfL services... Or, they accidentally did a bad job/rushed it etc. but aren't in a hurry to fix it because it's not a TfL service.
Nothing to prove this, except for the fact that generally TfL don't do such a terrible job of weaving lines in. Especially compared to the Elizabeth line which was also only added a few years ago.
To my mind, TfL do an equally terrible job of weaving their own lines in, so I don't think there's any motive to make Thameslink look bad. The Elizabeth line is also shown in a very meandering way - particularly East of Liverpool Street - despite being one of the fastest lines on the map. Ditto the Jubilee line East of Waterloo. If TfL really wanted to discourage people from using national rail, they could easily do it by highlighting on the maps those stations/parts of stations where boarding/alighting will get you charged the higher National Rail fares instead of the lower TfL fares - but they don't. So I think it's just incompetence at map design/political pressure to put stuff on maps that doesn't accord with what would be most useful to most passengers.