• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Greater Manchester Picc-Vic Underground Link

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mollington St

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2019
Messages
142
A 10 page Handbill produced in the early 1970s to promote the building of the Manchester Picc- Vic Underground Link

With its 3 new stations in between.
 

Attachments

  • Scan_20221005 (15).png
    Scan_20221005 (15).png
    933.2 KB · Views: 117
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
11,919
Already discussed here...

 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,984
Location
Hope Valley
A 10 page Handbill produced in the early 1970s to promote the building of the Manchester Picc- Vic Underground Link

With its 3 new stations in between.
No exactly a very compelling vision on the front cover!

Random staircase out in the rain on Piccadilly Approach, no lifts, train stops halfway along the platform, past the stairs...
 

Revaulx

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2019
Messages
487
Location
Saddleworth
No exactly a very compelling vision on the front cover!

Random staircase out in the rain on Piccadilly Approach, no lifts, train stops halfway along the platform, past the stairs...
I think the position of the train in the platform can be put down to artistic licence :D

You’re right about the others though. As someone who was very much there at the time, Picc-Vic always felt a bit half-baked, with neither SELNEC nor BR appearing terribly enthusiastic.

The cancellation due to “government cuts” and the lack of fight that greeted it seemed all too convenient, especially given that similar projects involving at least as much capex went ahead on Merseyside and Tyneside.

Rumours at the time suggested that SELNEC bosses were only interested in their bus empire, the declining use of which was only matched by the rate at which they managed to pile up overheads. The Merseyside and Tyneside projects both managed to relieve BR of the need to run pesky local services themselves, and freed up infrastructure for their core Inter City brand. Picc-Vic would have done the opposite, at least at its south end, increasing stopping services on the main line through Stockport.

It would have given us grade separation at Slade Lane though, which would be jolly nice to have now. The Airport branch was certainly not included in the initial plans.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
7,159
The Picc-Vic was also the reason for the lack of a Class 316 EMU wasn't it? (i.e. there's a gap between 315 and 317).

The 316 was, I believe, the class which was to have operated it.
 

Mollington St

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2019
Messages
142
The Art work does not shout of much more than a pipe dream the reserve details a Map detailing frequency of trains and journey times etc

Moving on from the failed Picc to Vic Link , here are some examples of 12/16 page handbills when GMC and GMPTE did get their Rail Policy sorted with new opening of Stations and the like in the 1980s

Here is a copy of the GMC April 1985 Full Brochure - This time we get to see impressions of the Trains along with Maps and Projected Costings
 

Attachments

  • Scan_20221006.png
    Scan_20221006.png
    709.2 KB · Views: 65
  • Scan_20221005 (18).png
    Scan_20221005 (18).png
    862.2 KB · Views: 61
  • Scan_20221005 (16).png
    Scan_20221005 (16).png
    791.6 KB · Views: 57
  • Scan_20221005 (19).png
    Scan_20221005 (19).png
    769.4 KB · Views: 63
  • Scan_20221013 (11).png
    Scan_20221013 (11).png
    1.8 MB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top