Railsigns
Established Member
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 2,753
The idea that any signal structure more complicated than a straight post is a gantry.
I was at the North Tyneside Railway's 30th anniversary Gala back in July. The have one of the former Harton Colliery electric locomotives there. Which is round 100+ years old [the Harton system being electrified before the First World War!]. I jokingly remarked to another couple that the sooner "they" go electric the better and get rid of these dirty smelly steam engines the better! I went to remark how part of their system along the coast from Westoe Colliery to Whitburn Colliery had been operated under the light railway act and offered a passenger service. The line had survived until the sixties before the Coal Board closed it and the Colliery, then lifting the line. The woman replied that Beeching had a lot to answer for..... My reply then being: What's Beeching got to do with the National Coal Board?
That you cannot walk between carriages without leaving the train and walking along the platform (even when the connecting doors have illuminated door open buttons)
Isn't the fallacy here that a railway exists to, or is ever likely to, make money?Many lines listed for closure in the Beeching Report were actually making money, with Beeching merely being a pawn for a powerful road lobby.
Which part of the road lobby was expecting to make lots of money from the closure of little-used branch lines?Isn't the fallacy here that a railway exists to, or is ever likely to, make money?
Ad your second half: well yes, technically Beeching was a pawn for a Transport Minister who was a pawn for a powerful road lobby........
A fallacy to think it's obvious. Not everyone sees that, either they are nowhere near or just have no experience of a train in parts, or selective door opening and the like. Or they don't hear (eg earphones) or don't understand what is announced, even if when approaching several preceding stations. The inconsistent alphabetical disorder of eg Coach F or L doesn't help. It must be a pain to be in the wrong part of the train, eg Ivybridge, to be carried forward to Plymouth with the last train back goneThat you can walk between units when on the train even though, as was clearly visible from the platform you were just standing on, there’s two nose cones and a coupler the size of a shoe box separating them.
You win! Well I have another token one but it's maybe too rude for here! It involves a token falling down someone's trousers and you can work out the restThe real token belter was one day at the front of a dmu, alongside a father and small boy, on the West Somerset, who used a simple wooden staff, which was being handed to the driver.
"What's that, dad".
"Oh, it's specially for when there is only one railway line. So if we see another train coming the other way and have to stop our driver goes over to the other one and hits him over the head with it".
Wasn't there an incident on a North Wales branch line where a driver was having an affair with a married lady and would leave his loco (with token aboard) while he engaged his carnal needs? Then one day the cuckolded husband pinched the token and hid it. Took a lot of explaining away . . .You win! Well I have another token one but it's maybe too rude for here! It involves a token falling down someone's trousers and you can work out the rest
A fallacy to think it's obvious. Not everyone sees that, either they are nowhere near or just have no experience of a train in parts, or selective door opening and the like. Or they don't hear (eg earphones) or don't understand what is announced, even if when approaching several preceding stations. The inconsistent alphabetical disorder of eg Coach F or L doesn't help. It must be a pain to be in the wrong part of the train, eg Ivybridge, to be carried forward to Plymouth with the last train back gone![]()
The part that realised that not every user of little used branch lines would go by bus to the junction and train forward, but would in fact buy a car and give up on the railway.Which part of the road lobby was expecting to make lots of money from the closure of little-used branch lines?
I wonder how many of the handful of remaining passengers bought a car as a result of their local branch line closing? I suspect nearly everyone who could afford to do so already had.The part that realised that not every user of little used branch lines would go by bus to the junction and train forward, but would in fact buy a car and give up on the railway.
That the engineers line reference for the line from London to Brighton is BML.Everybody calls it on the BML “Ouse valley Viaduct” when all our actual diagrams show it officially as “Ouse Viaduct”
I thought 3rd rail trains had a wider guague and worked like a train set. But I was very very young.When I was young (very young) I thought that the third & fourth rails on undeground tracks were for the motors & the brakes respectively. I haven't become an electrician.
I was in about the viaduct, not the line designation.That the engineers line reference for the line from London to Brighton is BML.
Marples Ridgeway was particularly in my mind as an obvious example. "Little-used branch lines" feed traffic to mainlines paralleling motorways et al. - most traffic on a motorway is not actually going from a major centre to a major centre.Which part of the road lobby was expecting to make lots of money from the closure of little-used branch lines?
To be fair I'm not sure that's a common fallacy! I don't think even DfT or Government actually go so far as to say BR was as expensive as the privatised railway - I was about to say that even they have some shame vis-à-vis demonstrable untruths, but having read the IRP yesterday I will withdraw that comment!The idea that British Rail was invariably dirty, run down, on its knees, unreliable and just as expensive as the privatised railway is now.