There is more than one Holy Island in the UK, and at least one has no railways. So it needed to be disambiguated as the one at Holyhead.I did mention Holy Island.
I would never have thought of Inchgarvie though.
There is more than one Holy Island in the UK, and at least one has no railways. So it needed to be disambiguated as the one at Holyhead.I did mention Holy Island.
I would never have thought of Inchgarvie though.
If we're discounting man-made structures, should we regard Barry Island as an island as it was artificially joined to the mainland by infilling the intervening sea?It's man made and doesn't reach the sea, so it hardly makes an island of the marsh. If we did include it, we'd have to include the islands formed by canals like the Kennet and Avon, or the Trent and Mersey.
Difficult one, because it's arguably an acceleration of the natural silting process (that did for the Isles of Thanet and Grain).If we're discounting man-made structures, should we regard Barry Island as an island as it was artificially joined to the mainland by infilling the intervening sea?
If we're doing that, a lot of places in the Fens also count.If we're discounting man-made structures, should we regard Barry Island as an island as it was artificially joined to the mainland by infilling the intervening sea?
Yes, you're quite right. I apologise. I did if course nean Holy Island adjacent to Anglesey, but I didn't make thar absolutely clear.There is more than one Holy Island in the UK, and at least one has no railways. So it needed to be disambiguated as the one at Holyhead.
Is this similar to the Isles of Thanet, Grain and Purbeck - in that they haven't been islands for at least 500 years?and if you want to push the definition - "The Black Isle" which is in no way an island - but Beauly, Muir of Ord & Connon Bridge stations are all withn "The Black Isle"
No - its part of the mainland North East of Inverness known as "The Black Isle" - I have no idea why though!Is this similar to the Isles of Thanet, Grain and Purbeck - in that they haven't been islands for at least 500 years?
No - its part of the mainland North East of Inverness known as "The Black Isle" - I have no idea why though!
Think it's the English translation of the Scottish Gaelic "An t-Eilean Dubh (= The Black isle - or island). Usually, 'Eilean' means island, but it can apparently also mean a piece of raised up ground surrounded by a marsh.No - its part of the mainland North East of Inverness known as "The Black Isle" - I have no idea why though!
I did mention Moncreiffe Island in the first post. I probably misspelt it thoughPerth - Moncreiffe Island (Line to Dundee)
and if you want to push the definition - "The Black Isle" which is in no way an island - but Beauly, Muir of Ord & Connon Bridge stations are all withn "The Black Isle"
Surely that's General Wade to us folkTraditional thinking says that "black" comes from the colour of the soil.
The 'isle' part is more nebulous. In years past, the Connon and Beauly rivers would have been larger, with a marshy hinterland. Combined, this would have virtually cut off the peninsula from the mainland with a marshy 'neck'.
Also remember that prior to Mr Wade, and his road building campaigns, it would have been far, far quicker to take a ferry across the Beauly Firth at Kessock, and another across the Cromarty Firth at Invergordon, than try the road via Muir of Ord.
I suspect that it is - neither look man-made, although both are man-managed. Rivers will naturally cut lots of new channels in the various flood cycles in the lower river, although normally the old courses dry up but the navigation work probably helps keep these two both flowing. You can see lots of other old courses of the trent on the island as well.It's always hard to tell on a navigable river but is the island between the two branches of the Trent at Newark natural?
If it is then Newark Castle is another station on an island.
Also Baths Island in the Thames at Windsor crossed by the Slough - W&E Central branch.Guards Club Island at Maidenhead.
Black Potts Ait near Datchet.
I suspect that it is - neither look man-made, although both are man-managed. Rivers will naturally cut lots of new channels in the various flood cycles in the lower river, although normally the old courses dry up but the navigation work probably helps keep these two both flowing. You can see lots of other old courses of the trent on the island as well.
From the train it'd be quite hard to tell the navigation channel isn't artificial - only the history really gives it away. You need the aerial shot to see the much more wiggly course.And I over looked the river islands in the Trent. Whenever I go over the Trent on the ECML, which I usually do about 5 or 6 times a year, I've always wondered about the two channels. I just assumed one was artificial. Obviously I was completely wrong about that.
Apologies if this had been covered in a thread before, but I was wondering about this. I can think of:
Great Britain (obviously)
Isle of Wight
Portsea Island
Isle of Sheppey
Anglesey
Holy Island
Monicreiffe Island (in Perth)
Any others?
I think SWR leases the infrastructure from Network Rail, so it probably counts by means of ownership?Is the Isle of Wight actually Network Rail? Isn’t the TOC actually also the infrastructure provider?
It’s some sort of split responsibility, but hard to pin down the exact demarcation. I expect there’s definitely certain upper limits to SWR’s financial responsibility. I know from previous discussions SWR employ the signallers, and possibly the regular day to day track maintainers, but don’t NR remain responsible for major capital works, such as the current renewals on the pier?Is the Isle of Wight actually Network Rail? Isn’t the TOC actually also the infrastructure provider?
NR own it but SWR have the responsibility for operation and upkeep. NR do certain bits like final upload of the timetable.Is the Isle of Wight actually Network Rail? Isn’t the TOC actually also the infrastructure provider?
I think SWR leases the infrastructure from Network Rail, so it probably counts by means of ownership?
From the 2024 Network Statement:It’s some sort of split responsibility, but hard to pin down the exact demarcation. I expect there’s definitely certain upper limits to SWR’s financial responsibility. I know from previous discussions SWR employ the signallers, and possibly the regular day to day track maintainers, but don’t NR remain responsible for major capital works, such as the current renewals on the pier?
So I'd imagine that capital works beyond the scope of SWR's lease would be NR's responsibility but day-to-day upkeep Island Line's.We are also the owner of rail infrastructure and assets on the Isle of Wight, but we have leased them to First MTR South Western Trains Limited (although the Island Line brand has been retained) the entire railway land, infrastructure and assets on the island for a cumulative period of 45 years, commencing 1 April 1994. This is a vertically integrated railway: Island Line is responsible for all railway operations and maintenance of the infrastructure.
...
Where Network Rail owns network (e.g. in a freight depot), but has leased it to another party (e.g. a FOC) that manages that network, then the other party will be the operator and the facility is no longer part of the main rail network (for the purpose of this Network Statement).