Well, it's certainly colourful.Please tell me what you think!
I started jokingly writing about the lack of scale between Crewe and Warrington, then looked further down and to the right and realised how much it actually looks like the tube map!As part of a series of alternative tube maps I’ve been working on, I made a tube map of Britain. It’s not very geographically accurate (but, hey, it’s a tube map) and I’ve had to add a few branches, stations etc. Please tell me what you think!
Would certainly allow some interesting (no changes required?) journey opportunities.Trying to follow the S&C was... 'interesting' to say the least.
Something like this version from May 1982? Doesn't use too many colours, but nevertheless quite clearly set out.There used to be an InterCity map of uk rail services but it was drawn into a roughly geographical shape.
The Great Bear is a four colour offset lithograph mounted in an anodised aluminium frame. It is an altered version of the map of the London Underground created by Henry (Harry) C. Beck (1903-74) in 1931. Patterson replaced the names of the underground stations with the names of engineers, philosophers, explorers, planets, journalists, footballers, musicians, film actors, saints, Italian artists, sinologues (Chinese scholars), comedians and 'Louis' (French kings).
Something like this version from May 1982? Doesn't use too many colours, but nevertheless quite clearly set out.
(Link to schematic map diagram of InterCity rail network, circa May 1982).
Believe that back in 1982, New Pudsey was occasionally served by through Inter City trains from Bradford Interchange to/from London Kings CrossAnd New Pudsey on there for some reason, hardly a major destination!
It was more based on Britain’s geography than rail lines - for example I would prioritise larger towns which don’t have a rail station than smaller ones which doJust one example - Glencoe has never had any railway or station.
A line through Wembley, with a football connection? It'll never catch on.Alternative versions of Harry Beck's map, with different station names, have been around for a long time.
"The Great Bear" by Simon Patterson dates from 1992 and is part of the Tate Modern art collection, though, according to their website, it is not currently on display.
![]()
‘The Great Bear‘, Simon Patterson, 1992 | Tate
‘The Great Bear‘, Simon Patterson, 1992www.tate.org.uk
The best alternative versions that I have seen are those where the real names of the station names are all translated into German and where the station names are all given as anagrams.
Well, I never knew that the South Western, Brighton, Chatham and South Eastern main lines were once considered InterCity.Something like this version from May 1982? Doesn't use too many colours, but nevertheless quite clearly set out.
(Link to schematic map diagram of InterCity rail network, circa May 1982).
If not "InterCity" branded as such, then perhaps 'Principal services'?Well, I never knew that the South Western, Brighton, Chatham and South Eastern main lines were once considered InterCity.
So what's the rationale for Glencoe?It was more based on Britain’s geography than rail lines - for example I would prioritise larger towns which don’t have a rail station than smaller ones which do
It just seemed like a good place to put a station between Ciranlarich and Fort William, plus it was one of the first places to come up on Google mapsSo what's the rationale for Glencoe?
I see... I would suggest that Google Maps is probably not a good place to start!It just seemed like a good place to put a station between Ciranlarich and Fort William, plus it was one of the first places to come up on Google maps