No.Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
That would presumably depend on how the various strata were arranged, the strength of the rock in various directions and the size of the void.Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
Apart from DfT!Yes, with a few specialised solutions in places.
Fairly moot, as nobody wants to run a W10/12 through it.
Completely agree, the Calder Valley may be longer but the gradients are more favorable especially for freight.Personally I wouldn't like to have freight on the route and believe Calder valley would probably be better suited for freight. Apart from Miles Platting Jn, I can't remember the gradients on that route. I'm open to being completely wrong!
Thanks. I , as a non-engineer, was wondering whether a machine with roof-mounted cutting equipment could widen the roof, so to speak, so that it could accommodate W12 wagons, which are increasingly becoming the standard.No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.
Of course if you're using a TBM it will be circular no matter what your ground conditions, unless you have one of these:
View attachment 99420
Thanks. I , as a non-engineer, was wondering whether a machine with roof-mounted cutting equipment could widen the roof, so to speak, so that it could accommodate W12 wagons, which are increasingly becoming the standard.
I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down toCompletely agree, the Calder Valley may be longer but the gradients are more favorable especially for freight.
Running all the way down to Litchfield may still be preferable than having to sit and wait behind all-shacks local trains at Manchester, and waiting for the path through Man Vic and Salford.I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down to Litchfield!
Or even Lichfield, which is over 100 miles further north than Litchfield, and has the advantage of a railway.I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down to Litchfield!
Oops, I meant LichfieldOr even Lichfield, which is over 100 miles further north than Litchfield, and has the advantage of a railway.
Mickey Mouse shaped tunnel for Disneyland?No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.
Of course if you're using a TBM it will be circular no matter what your ground conditions, unless you have one of these:
View attachment 99420
I am not an expert but having looked at the photographs wouldn’t it be more logical and cost effective to rebore the old two tunnels, perhaps into one large bore. This would eliminate disruption during the work and enable the most cost effective and least time solution.Yeah, I can't imagine the route being closed for year. Even six months would be a pain!
You could temporary re-open the closed tunnels next to Standedge but that would definitely add cost to what would be an already expensive project, just to design those lines and do that work (repairing, making sure it's safe, up to standard, etc). That's assuming you can even get the funding.
At Standedge, because of the cross passages between all 4 tunnels, it's highly likely that the cheapest and quickest way to do it would be to build a brand new tunnel (which would also potentially allow realignment at the Marsden end). It would be a new excavation, within a controlled environment and could be designed and built from scratch to today's standards.I am not an expert but having looked at the photographs wouldn’t it be more logical and cost effective to rebore the old two tunnels, perhaps into one large bore. This would eliminate disruption during the work and enable the most cost effective and least time solution.
Nice time to mention that contracts for the 57.5km Mont d'Ambin Base Tunnel (replacing the 1872 Fréjus rail tunnel) between Lyon and Turin have just been let.All the talk of a new tunnel at Standedge is irrelevant. If there’s a new tunnel going to be built there, it will extend a lot further west...
Construction will be a mix of TBM and excavation.Three major contracts have been awarded for construction of the 57·5 km cross-border Mont Cenis base tunnel, which is central to the programme to develop a high-capacity rail route between Lyon and Torino.
That's a fascinating image. Given that you can clearly see one end of the tunnel from the other you might have been able to fill them both in and created one new bore down the middle, in a straight line. You would have had to close the whole route, of course.Also, I have some pictures from a talk about Farnworth I attended some years back.
View attachment 99431
Everything that I've heard from people who know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem. The main complicating factor is the length- an obstacle that certainly isn't insurmountable.All the talk of a new tunnel at Standedge is irrelevant. If there’s a new tunnel going to be built there, it will extend a lot further west...
Given the short distance involved, if you were going to the trouble of blockading the route you may as well have opened the whole thing out rather than re-boring. IIRC there's one property above the tunnel that may have needed compulsory purchase.That's a fascinating image. Given that you can clearly see one end of the tunnel from the other you might have been able to fill them both in and created one new bore down the middle, in a straight line. You would have had to close the whole route, of course.
Everything that I've heard from people that know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem.
Well, you are one of those "who know what they're talking about"...It isn’t, as most tunnels are not - I’ve been saying that on these pages for years!
Yeah I just don’t get what the imagined difficulties of wiring Standedge could possibly be. Sure, there’s a nasty bend at the east end, but that’s an operational hindrance rather than an obstacle to wiring.Everything that I've heard from people that know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem. The main complicating factor is the length- an obstacle that certainly isn't insurmountable.
Given the short distance involved, if you were going to the trouble of blockading the route you may as well have opened the whole thing out rather than re-boring. IIRC there's one property above the tunnel that may have needed compulsory purchase.
Oh no it isn't...Stalybridge tunnel, however, is a major headache according to a couple of items I've read recently.
Could you elaborate please?Oh no it isn't...
Sorry not paying attention at my end I thought Standedge had been borough up again!Could you elaborate please?
I agree. I think out of the three tunnels, Stalybridge would be the most difficult one.Stalybridge tunnel, however, is a major headache according to a couple of items I've read recently.