• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Tunnel Re-boring

Status
Not open for further replies.

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,221
Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,396
Location
Bristol
Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
That would presumably depend on how the various strata were arranged, the strength of the rock in various directions and the size of the void.
 

The Lad

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2015
Messages
408
In Standedge the current tunnel at each end crosses over the canal tunnel and is a different shape, at the eastern end at least.
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,265
Does a tunnel through hard Rock have to have a circular Xsection?
No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.

Of course if you're using a TBM it will be circular no matter what your ground conditions, unless you have one of these:
1625752865828.png
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
Yes, with a few specialised solutions in places.

Fairly moot, as nobody wants to run a W10/12 through it.
Apart from DfT!

Personally I wouldn't like to have freight on the route and believe Calder valley would probably be better suited for freight. Apart from Miles Platting Jn, I can't remember the gradients on that route. I'm open to being completely wrong!
Completely agree, the Calder Valley may be longer but the gradients are more favorable especially for freight.
 
Last edited:

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,221
No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.

Of course if you're using a TBM it will be circular no matter what your ground conditions, unless you have one of these:
View attachment 99420
Thanks. I , as a non-engineer, was wondering whether a machine with roof-mounted cutting equipment could widen the roof, so to speak, so that it could accommodate W12 wagons, which are increasingly becoming the standard.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
Thanks. I , as a non-engineer, was wondering whether a machine with roof-mounted cutting equipment could widen the roof, so to speak, so that it could accommodate W12 wagons, which are increasingly becoming the standard.

Easily. But that would weaken the structural integrity of the structure.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,221
I was only suggesting it for proper rock, not the stuff the softies of the SE England call rock! True grit!
 

Legolash2o

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2018
Messages
601
Completely agree, the Calder Valley may be longer but the gradients are more favorable especially for freight.
I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down to Litchfield Lichfield!
 
Last edited:

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,396
Location
Bristol
I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down to Litchfield!
Running all the way down to Litchfield may still be preferable than having to sit and wait behind all-shacks local trains at Manchester, and waiting for the path through Man Vic and Salford.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,741
Location
Leeds
I believe there's also less traffic in general and it's better than having to go all the way down to Litchfield!
Or even Lichfield, which is over 100 miles further north than Litchfield, and has the advantage of a railway.
 

mr_moo

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2009
Messages
529
Location
Cambridgeshire
There's an interesting video about Farnworth tunnel on youtube:

Also, I have some pictures from a talk about Farnworth I attended some years back.

1625764763777.png1625764693958.png1625764738641.png1625764785939.png1625764795962.png1625764805841.png1625764832281.png1625764849308.png1625764859400.png
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,926
Location
Nottingham
No, in fact non-circular sections are generally easier in hard rock than in soft material, the difference being that hard rock is essentially self-supporting and the tunnel lining is there to stop loose bits of rock falling off, whereas the tunnel lining in soft material has to support the weight of the ground above it and a circular arch is more structurally efficient.

Of course if you're using a TBM it will be circular no matter what your ground conditions, unless you have one of these:
View attachment 99420
Mickey Mouse shaped tunnel for Disneyland?
 

GC class B1

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2021
Messages
447
Location
East midlands
Yeah, I can't imagine the route being closed for year. Even six months would be a pain!


You could temporary re-open the closed tunnels next to Standedge but that would definitely add cost to what would be an already expensive project, just to design those lines and do that work (repairing, making sure it's safe, up to standard, etc). That's assuming you can even get the funding.
I am not an expert but having looked at the photographs wouldn’t it be more logical and cost effective to rebore the old two tunnels, perhaps into one large bore. This would eliminate disruption during the work and enable the most cost effective and least time solution.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,396
Location
Bristol
I am not an expert but having looked at the photographs wouldn’t it be more logical and cost effective to rebore the old two tunnels, perhaps into one large bore. This would eliminate disruption during the work and enable the most cost effective and least time solution.
At Standedge, because of the cross passages between all 4 tunnels, it's highly likely that the cheapest and quickest way to do it would be to build a brand new tunnel (which would also potentially allow realignment at the Marsden end). It would be a new excavation, within a controlled environment and could be designed and built from scratch to today's standards.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
All the talk of a new tunnel at Standedge is irrelevant. If there’s a new tunnel going to be built there, it will extend a lot further west...
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,685
Location
Mold, Clwyd
All the talk of a new tunnel at Standedge is irrelevant. If there’s a new tunnel going to be built there, it will extend a lot further west...
Nice time to mention that contracts for the 57.5km Mont d'Ambin Base Tunnel (replacing the 1872 Fréjus rail tunnel) between Lyon and Turin have just been let.
The overall project is a snip at €8.6 billion...
Lyon – Torino base tunnel contracts signed | News | Railway Gazette International
Turin–Lyon high-speed railway - Wikipedia
Three major contracts have been awarded for construction of the 57·5 km cross-border Mont Cenis base tunnel, which is central to the programme to develop a high-capacity rail route between Lyon and Torino.
Construction will be a mix of TBM and excavation.
The tunnel maximum design speed is 220km/h, so not quite high speed (it will also carry freight).
On the French side the project also delivers a high speed line Lyon-Chambery and part way to Grenoble.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
1,895
Location
Leeds
Also, I have some pictures from a talk about Farnworth I attended some years back.

View attachment 99431
That's a fascinating image. Given that you can clearly see one end of the tunnel from the other you might have been able to fill them both in and created one new bore down the middle, in a straight line. You would have had to close the whole route, of course.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,679
Location
Another planet...
All the talk of a new tunnel at Standedge is irrelevant. If there’s a new tunnel going to be built there, it will extend a lot further west...
Everything that I've heard from people who know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem. The main complicating factor is the length- an obstacle that certainly isn't insurmountable.
That's a fascinating image. Given that you can clearly see one end of the tunnel from the other you might have been able to fill them both in and created one new bore down the middle, in a straight line. You would have had to close the whole route, of course.
Given the short distance involved, if you were going to the trouble of blockading the route you may as well have opened the whole thing out rather than re-boring. IIRC there's one property above the tunnel that may have needed compulsory purchase.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
Everything that I've heard from people that know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem.

It isn’t, as most tunnels are not - I’ve been saying that on these pages for years!
 

Revaulx

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2019
Messages
487
Location
Saddleworth
Everything that I've heard from people that know what they're talking about suggests that there's nothing about the Standedge tunnel to suggest that wiring it would be a major problem. The main complicating factor is the length- an obstacle that certainly isn't insurmountable.

Given the short distance involved, if you were going to the trouble of blockading the route you may as well have opened the whole thing out rather than re-boring. IIRC there's one property above the tunnel that may have needed compulsory purchase.
Yeah I just don’t get what the imagined difficulties of wiring Standedge could possibly be. Sure, there’s a nasty bend at the east end, but that’s an operational hindrance rather than an obstacle to wiring.

Scout Tunnel only has one house above it…
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,741
Location
Leeds
Stalybridge tunnel, however, is a major headache according to a couple of items I've read recently.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,741
Location
Leeds
That's twice in three months, in two different threads, that I've said Stalybridge tunnel is a problem, and each time the first reply was from someone who thought I'd said Standedge!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top