I’d be willing to purchase a ticket, might not be £20, but it’ll be something!@Adam Williams. After your recent "experience" when booking a ticket with Rail.Ninja, are you prepared to put another £20 at stake to see if this latest ticket provider can do any better? (Be fairly difficult for them not to!)![]()
Nice one. Have to say that you and @Adam Williams are slightly braver in user testing these sites than I would be!I’d be willing to purchase a ticket, might not be £20, but it’ll be something!![]()
The other thing that annoyed me is that you can't buy train tickets from the usual search screen for planning uber journeys, it will only show you Uber taxi options. Train ticket travel is accessed via a different part of the app. Not very multi-modal / integrated.First of all - you can search up destinations everywhere, when I tried looking up a station, places in India showed up! However no journeys will show if you select that to somewhere like London (unsure if legit journeys elsewhere work).
Yep - this is one of my biggest issues I faced too. It’s a whole separate “tab”.The other thing that annoyed me is that you can't buy train tickets from the usual search screen for planning uber journeys, it will only show you Uber taxi options. Train ticket travel is accessed via a different part of the app. Not very multi-modal / integrated.
Whatever else may be right or wrong with the booking process, I applaud that it gives a 'suggested' itinerary (first image) rather than imply 'you must travel on this train'.Yep - this is one of my biggest issues I faced too. It’s a whole separate “tab”.
I managed to book a ticket! After multiple times of the app failing…
It took about a minute for the booking to process.
I suspect you are correct. As an aside, there are adverts on Southern units advertising a ticket booking system that claims 'anywhere in the UK', with an asterisk stating 'excluding Northern Ireland'. Why not just say 'Great Britain', then?As they say "anywhere in the UK", do they also mean Northern Ireland? (My guess is that they don't.)
Because Southern's website will sell you tickets to Holyhead and ShanklinI suspect you are correct. As an aside, there are adverts on Southern units advertising a ticket booking system that claims 'anywhere in the UK', with an asterisk stating 'excluding Northern Ireland'. Why not just say 'Great Britain', then?
Both are in Great Britain as a political entity, though, which I suspect is the more commonly acknowledged definition compared to the geographic oneBecause Southern's website will sell you tickets to Holyhead and Shanklin![]()
But the ISO country code 'GB', which sounds like what you are referring to by political entity, includes Northern Ireland. So they'd still need to use the exception.Both are in Great Britain as a political entity, though, which I suspect is the more commonly acknowledged definition compared to the geographic one![]()
It does look like they are thinking of integrating it somewhat though - look at the "reserve trip" that is available in the 2nd screenshot. Of course that way Uber's reserve a trip works is pretty rubbish (it basically just schedules a ping for the time you choose to get a trip, so no different to you manually trying to get an Uber at the time you pick, and certainly no guarantee that a driver will be available for you).Yep - this is one of my biggest issues I faced too. It’s a whole separate “tab”.
I managed to book a ticket! After multiple times of the app failing…
It took about a minute for the booking to process.
No, that's an exceedingly niche interpretation - so niche I hadn't even thought of it, haha. Regardless though, the ISO 3166-1 country codes GB and GBR represent the UK in full, yes, but that's because they're defined that way. They could equally have been set as UK and UKI, or whatever. There's even an argument that GB was chosen in the early '70s when the standard was put together with the idea of being ready for a time when Northern Ireland was divested (but that's another topic!).But the ISO country code 'GB', which sounds like what you are referring to by political entity, includes Northern Ireland. So they'd still need to use the exception.
This post is an excellent demonstration of why it's now heavily preferred that if one means 'England, Scotland and Wales' they really should say so. Or alternatively 'United Kingdom excluding Northern Ireland'. No doubt this is precisely why Southern... did just so. I thought you were referring to the ISO country code in contrast with a geographical indication, when in fact you were referring to a loose, figurative sense of what might be termed "British heritage", in the context of something which is mostly a geographical category (a railway) rather than a political one.No, that's an exceedingly niche interpretation - so niche I hadn't even thought of it, haha. Regardless though, the ISO 3166-1 country codes GB and GBR represent the UK in full, yes, but that's because they're defined that way. They could equally have been set as UK and UKI, or whatever. There's even an argument that GB was chosen in the early '70s when the standard was put together with the idea of being ready for a time when Northern Ireland was divested (but that's another topic!).
Anyway, what I was actually thinking is that the "Great Britain" part of the United Kingdom etc etc is all of England, all of Wales, and all of Scotland, which has been a settled definition since the Acts of Union 1707. It shouldn't be a surprise either, since we're very familiar here with using GB to describe all the bits of railway in the UK that aren't in NI.
Incidentally, IIRC the Advertising Standards Authority are also weary of accepting the "Great Britain is only the mainland itself" definition (albeit more when describing postage or shipping costs) - their guidance has generally been to use the description "GB mainland" if one wants to exclude all the various islands.
Well, it wasn't in that loose, figurative sense as much as it was the fact that today's United Kingdom is the union of the Kingdom of Great Britain (itself a union of the Kingdom of England, which included Wales, and the Kingdom of Scotland) and the remainder of the Kingdom of Ireland, which is absolutely defined in law as it currently stands - but I accept that I could have made that more clear, and the rest of your point very obviously stands! I'd certainly be interested to see which interpretation is more prevalent amongst the general public.I thought you were referring to the ISO country code in contrast with a geographical indication, when in fact you were referring to a loose, figurative sense of what might be termed "British heritage", in the context of something which is mostly a geographical category (a railway) rather than a political one.
The reality is that nobody uses or thinks about that definition in relation to buying train tickets any more than they do about the ISO definition. And indeed nobody really uses it for anything practical at all any longer because it's considered unacceptable to refer to its politically sensitive old world status overtly, as you helpfully point out one part of which is that Wales was part of the Kingdom of England following an invasion of former Welsh states.Well, it wasn't in that loose, figurative sense as much as it was the fact that today's United Kingdom is the union of the Kingdom of Great Britain (itself a union of the Kingdom of England, which included Wales, and the Kingdom of Scotland) and the remainder of the Kingdom of Ireland, which is absolutely defined in law as it currently stands - but I accept that I could have made that more clear, and the rest of your point very obviously stands! I'd certainly be interested to see which interpretation is more prevalent amongst the general public.
Having taken a journey through to the payment page (but not paid), "Uber Cash" seems to be a valid payment method. Presumably Uber vouchers simply top up your Uber Cash.To drag this back on topic, I wonder whether one can use Uber vouchers or credits to pay for train tickets? One can get Uber vouchers often at 3-5% below face value via various voucher shops and corporate schemes.
They do. Thanks, I shall look into this further.Having taken a journey through to the payment page (but not paid), "Uber Cash" seems to be a valid payment method. Presumably Uber vouchers simply top up your Uber Cash.
I wouldn't necessarily say that "nobody really uses it for anything practical at all any longer", as I genuinely have encountered it with some frequency in the course of employment in fields that weren't even particularly specialised, but thinking on it now it's fair to say that still doesn't mean it's common in everyday life.And indeed nobody really uses it for anything practical at all any longer because it's considered unacceptable to refer to its politically sensitive old world status overtly, as you helpfully point out one part of which is that Wales was part of the Kingdom of England following an invasion of former Welsh states.
I'm afraid the redacted ticket number is stored in the clear within the barcode, which you haven't redacted.This is a screenshot ticket that came as a pdf... (Redacted parts of the ticket number and order number)